Connect with us

Canada News

Canada spent $14.5M fighting First Nations child advocate in court

Published

on

By Brett Forester, CBC News, RCI

Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, speaks on child welfare during the Assembly of First Nations special chiefs assembly in Ottawa on Dec. 4 Photo: Radio-Canada / Marie-Laure Josselin

Cindy Blackstock says the figure is ‘disappointing,’ NDP MP calls it ‘sickening’

Federal governments both Conservative and Liberal spent at least $14.5 million fighting a prominent First Nations child advocate in court over the last 18 years, according to a newly released estimate.

The Justice Department says it identified approximately 19 litigation files in its electronic system involving Canada and the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, led by executive director Cindy Blackstock, dating back to 2006.

Blackstock is a Gitksan social worker, academic and advocate who spent those years fighting at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and in the courts to stop the underfunding of the on-reserve child welfare system. Disappointed but not surprised, she told CBC Indigenous the figure likely underestimates the true spending.

I was really disappointed. This money should have been brought for the benefit of First Nations children instead of fighting things in court, she said.

Especially because the government’s record in court has been that it’s lost virtually every application when it’s fighting against First Nations kids.

Nine of the files were brought by Canada and 10 were brought by the Caring Society, with total associated costs amounting to approximately $14,545,000, the department says. This would average to about $800,000 per year.

The Justice Department released the information to New Democrat MP Niki Ashton, who filed an order paper question in October. She sought information on all cases involving Canada and the society, including citation, file number, date, court or tribunal and total expenditure.

The Crown asserted legal privileges and withheld most of that information. Canada waived only solicitor-client privilege and only to the extent of revealing the total legal costs and the approximate number of legal proceedings, the department said.

Ashton criticized the lack of transparency, but called it typical of a government that chooses to fight rather than live up to its obligations. The northern Manitoba MP said the effort was a waste of money better spent helping young people who live in some of the most marginalized conditions in Canada.

It’s sickening. We’re talking about heroic work done by the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, led by a well-respected Canadian figure and First Nations leader, Ashton said.

For years they’ve attacked her and the organization but now we also find out that they spent $14.5 million to fight them and essentially fight First Nations youth in court. This figure is appalling.

The Liberals have long denied they are fighting Indigenous kids in court, saying Canada wants a fair resolution but turned to the courts for guidance on some of the human rights tribunal’s precedent-setting orders.

Blackstock rejected that.

The government’s justification for spending this sort of money, in general, it’s hogwash and it doesn’t align with the factual record, she said.

Even in filing the initial case, we exhausted every option, presenting clear descriptions of the discrimination and how it could be remedied by Canada, and even having Canada’s agreement on some of those remedies, and Canada still chose not to do it.

A long battle

Blackstock and the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) opened the initial case together in February 2007. In a human rights complaint, they alleged the government’s underfunding of on-reserve child and family services was racially discriminatory.

In response, Stephen Harper’s Conservative government moved to have the complaint dismissed, and officials were caught wrongly spying (new window) on Blackstock in 2013.

The court-like tribunal panel upheld the allegations in a landmark decision in 2016. Three years later, the panel ordered Canada to pay the maximum allowable amount of $40,000 to each victim as compensation. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberals challenged this order in court, but lost.

Eventually, Canada complied by agreeing to pay $23.4 billion in compensation, which also settled a related class-action lawsuit. The Liberals recently offered $47.8 billion over 10 years to comply with an order to reform the on-reserve child welfare system.

In a statement, Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu pointed to that offer as evidence of Canada’s commitment to resolving the matter.

We reached a final settlement agreement that was rejected by the AFN and the Caring Society. The amount of funding in the agreement ended up $20 billion more than what was contained in the agreement in principle, Hajdu said in the statement.

With Canada’s nearly $48-billion mandate, we met the objectives all parties initially agreed on. We won’t give up on kids and their families. We must all work to ensure children get the care they need — care that lets them grow up surrounded by language, culture, and community.

After reading the Justice Department’s answer to Ashton’s request, Blackstock also questioned what the phrase litigation files means. More than 30 orders have been issued against Canada so far, not 19, she said.

The society previously estimated Canada’s legal costs at $10 million in 2012, so Blackstock doubted the Justice Department’s figures are comprehensive.

I think that this overall is an underestimate, she said.

A spokesperson for the minister of Justice referred questions about this to the department, which has not yet replied.


This article is republished from RCI.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Headline14 hours ago

The Sobering Reality of Growing Old

Growing old brings a sobering reality: time is finite.  You watch your body slow down, see your parents age, and...

Lifestyle3 weeks ago

Dr. David Suzuki’s Legacy: A Celebration at 90

Celebrating Dr. David Suzuki’s 90th birthday on Friday, May 22  was a true privilege and a great pleasure! My husband,...

Lifestyle4 weeks ago

What I Know Now About Motherhood

Did you know that a mother’s cells can live in her child’s body for their entire lives? This fascinating phenomenon...

Headline2 months ago

Age with Audacity

At 25, I imagined life at 50 would mean I’d be past my prime and grumpy.  Little did I know,...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Spring Clean Your Body, Mind and Home

Spring has sprung! This season is perfect for spring cleaning, but why stop at our homes?  We can also rejuvenate...

Lifestyle3 months ago

Hear Us Roar

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman who wants her happily ever after. I certainly did. After 21 years...

Lifestyle3 months ago

The Real Rich

Margaret Atwood aptly captured this dynamic with the phrase, “Old money whispers, new money shouts.”  Let me elaborate on this...

Headline4 months ago

Love in the Afternoon of Life

Love in later life—the 50s, 60s, 70s, and beyond—is a thriving, fulfilling reality. It offers companionship, improved well-being, and joy,...

Headline4 months ago

Your Most Important Relationship is With Yourself

Valentine’s Day shouldn’t be celebrated only for one day. Love should be celebrated everyday. Valentine’s Day, when expanded beyond romance,...

Headline5 months ago

The 2016 Trend Made Me Reflect On My Past & Present

Like many others, I couldn’t resist joining the 2016 throwback trend.  It was all over social media, with everyone sharing...