Connect with us

Canada News

Tribunal again tells feds to fund Indigenous child welfare, minister agrees

Published

on

FILE: Indigenous Services Minister Jane Philpott (Photo By Dave Kalmbach, CC BY-SA 4.0)

FILE: Indigenous Services Minister Jane Philpott (Photo By Dave Kalmbach, CC BY-SA 4.0)

OTTAWA — Child welfare agencies on reserves will immediately start getting funding to cover the actual cost of programs to keep families together, Indigenous Services Minister Jane Philpott said Thursday.

The commitment is a direct response to an order from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal made public on Thursday.

It was the fourth time the tribunal said Canada was not fully complying with its 2016 order to stop discriminating against kids on reserves and demanding proper funding for child and family service programs. In its 99-page decision, the tribunal panel said while the federal government had taken some steps to respond to the 2016 order in the last two years, it is “incorrect for Canada to say it did everything it could and everything that was asked of it.”

The tribunal also took issue with Canada’s argument that the tribunal can’t make orders about specific funding, saying that goes against the idea that human rights legislation is there to ensure governments uphold rights.

“More importantly, this case is vital because it deals with mass removal of children,” said the tribunal. “There is urgency to act and prioritize the elimination of the removal of children from their families and communities.”

While Indigenous children represent about seven per cent of all kids under the age of 15, they make up more than half of all kids in foster care. In some provinces as many as 90 per cent of kids in care are First Nations, Metis and Inuit.

Indigenous advocates and child welfare experts for decades blamed the fact governments funded foster care for Indigenous kids at the same rates as non-Indigenous kids, but when it comes to programs to help keep families together, programs on reserves were grossly underfunded. It meant there was an incentive for agencies to take kids away because it was the only way they could recoup their expenses.

In 2007, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society brought a human rights complaint which resulted in the 2016 ruling that First Nations kids were being discriminated against.

Cindy Blackstock, the executive director of the caring society, said Thursday it was shameful it took two years and four orders of non-compliance for Ottawa to get to the point of funding actual needs for kids, but she said at least it is happening now.

“Today is a good day for kids,” said Blackstock. “We have to stop letting them down.”

The tribunal gave the government until April 2 to fully fund prevention programs or risk being found in contempt, but Philpott says there will be no delay.

She wrote to 105 First Nations child welfare agencies on Thursday to tell them of the changes, saying “from this point forward” any prevention, investigation, intake, legal fees or building repairs they undertake will be reimbursed. That can include parenting programs, assistance finding work, counselling, transportation for kids to and from medical appointments, or even things as basic as helping a family buy a crib or extra formula.

The agencies generally receive a budgeted amount at the start of the year for these programs based on outdated assumptions about the number of families that need help. Whatever those budgets don’t cover will be reimbursed when agencies submit their costs to her department, Philpott said.

Blackstock said the commitment will eventually mean more families can stay together, because they will get the kinds of support they need rather than just have their kids yanked away.

The vast majority of children in foster care are there because of neglect and poverty, not abuse. Child welfare experts have said for decades that if programs could help lift families out of poverty, rather than just take kids away, it would be far more beneficial to everyone.

NDP Indigenous Affairs Critic Charlie Angus said he is concerned there isn’t a dollar figure attached to the promise. Philpott said they are still sorting out what this will cost and that the money will be in the 2018 federal budget, but Angus said it’s worrying that government doesn’t know what it has to spend.

Angus said a recent report on the funding shortfall in Manitoba alone was $80 million a year, which would mean the shortfall nationally is likely at least $200 million.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest

Health18 hours ago

Lessons from COVID-19: Preparing for future pandemics means looking beyond the health data

The World Health Organization declared an end to the COVID-19 public health emergency on May 5, 2023. In the year...

News18 hours ago

What a second Trump presidency might mean for the rest of the world

Just over six months ahead of the US election, the world is starting to consider what a return to a...

supermarket line supermarket line
Business and Economy19 hours ago

Some experts say the US economy is on the up, but here’s why voters don’t think so

Many Americans are gloomy about the economy, despite some data saying it is improving. The Economist even took this discussion...

News19 hours ago

Boris Johnson: if even the prime minister who introduced voter ID can forget his, do we need a rethink?

Former prime minister Boris Johnson was reportedly turned away on election day after arriving at his polling station to vote...

News19 hours ago

These local council results suggest Tory decimation at the general election ahead

The local elections which took place on May 2 have provided an unusually rich set of results to pore over....

Canada News19 hours ago

Whitehorse shelter operator needs review, Yukon MLAs decide in unanimous vote

Motion in legislature follows last month’s coroner’s inquest into 4 deaths at emergency shelter Yukon MLAs are questioning whether the Connective...

Business and Economy19 hours ago

Is the Loblaw boycott privileged? Here’s why some people aren’t shopping around

The boycott is fuelled by people fed up with high prices. But some say avoiding Loblaw stores is pricey, too...

Prime Video Prime Video
Business and Economy19 hours ago

Amazon Prime’s NHL deal breaches cable TV’s last line of defence: live sports

Sports have been a lifeline for cable giants dealing with cord cutters, but experts say that’s about to change For...

ALDI ALDI
Business and Economy19 hours ago

Canada’s shopping for a foreign grocer. Can an international retailer succeed here?

An international supermarket could spur competition, analysts say, if one is willing to come here at all With some Canadians...

taekwondo taekwondo
Lifestyle19 hours ago

As humans, we all want self-respect – and keeping that in mind might be the missing ingredient when you try to change someone’s mind

Why is persuasion so hard, even when you have facts on your side? As a philosopher, I’m especially interested in...

WordPress Ads