Connect with us

News

Congress has authority to re-impose death penalty: Panelo

Published

on

FILE: Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo (Photo: RODRIGUEZ/PPD)

FILE: Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo (Photo: RODRIGUEZ/PPD)

MANILA — Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo on Thursday said Congress had the authority to re-impose the death penalty if there were compelling reasons involving heinous crimes.

Panelo made this comment as the Senate announced its resumption of hearings on the revival of the death penalty within this month.

He said that while Section 19 of Article III of the 1987 Constitution prohibited the imposition of the death penalty, the same provision authorized the Congress to pass a law which re-imposed death penalty “for compelling reason involving heinous crimes.”

“In other words, the Congress has the authority to re-impose the death penalty, provided that, it finds compelling reasons involving heinous crimes therefor,” Panelo said in a press statement.

Contrary to critics’ claims, Panelo explained that re-imposition of the penalty was not inconsistent with the Philippines’ treaty obligations including under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

“The said instrument allows the imposition of the death penalty and only limits its application to the most serious crimes,” he said.

He also explained that treaties could not be in conflict with the country’s Constitution which “has higher authority over any legal instrument whether it be passed or ratified by the Congress.”

Panelo said while the second optional protocol of the ICCPR mandated the abolition of death penalty, the ICCPR still could not, however, prevail over Congress’ authority to re-impose capital punishment.

“Treaties ratified and incorporated and made part of the law of the land are only given equal standing with, and are not superior to our laws,” Panelo said.

“Hence, like any other law, a treaty may be repealed by a later act of Congress if it deems that such is warranted under the present circumstances or is violative of our Constitution,” he added.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Lifestyle1 week ago

Dr. David Suzuki’s Legacy: A Celebration at 90

Celebrating Dr. David Suzuki’s 90th birthday on Friday, May 22  was a true privilege and a great pleasure! My husband,...

Lifestyle2 weeks ago

What I Know Now About Motherhood

Did you know that a mother’s cells can live in her child’s body for their entire lives? This fascinating phenomenon...

Headline1 month ago

Age with Audacity

At 25, I imagined life at 50 would mean I’d be past my prime and grumpy.  Little did I know,...

Lifestyle1 month ago

Spring Clean Your Body, Mind and Home

Spring has sprung! This season is perfect for spring cleaning, but why stop at our homes?  We can also rejuvenate...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Hear Us Roar

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman who wants her happily ever after. I certainly did. After 21 years...

Lifestyle3 months ago

The Real Rich

Margaret Atwood aptly captured this dynamic with the phrase, “Old money whispers, new money shouts.”  Let me elaborate on this...

Headline3 months ago

Love in the Afternoon of Life

Love in later life—the 50s, 60s, 70s, and beyond—is a thriving, fulfilling reality. It offers companionship, improved well-being, and joy,...

Headline4 months ago

Your Most Important Relationship is With Yourself

Valentine’s Day shouldn’t be celebrated only for one day. Love should be celebrated everyday. Valentine’s Day, when expanded beyond romance,...

Headline4 months ago

The 2016 Trend Made Me Reflect On My Past & Present

Like many others, I couldn’t resist joining the 2016 throwback trend.  It was all over social media, with everyone sharing...

Headline5 months ago

How To Be Healthier Realistically

It’s a brand-new year and a brand new you! If you’re like me who had been indulging quite a bit...