Connect with us

Canada News

Harper says he did nothing wrong in nominating Marc Nadon to Supreme Court

Published

on

stephen harper

LONDON, Ont.—Prime Minister Stephen Harper is insisting there was nothing wrong with how he arrived at his decision to nominate Marc Nadon to the Supreme Court of Canada.

And in a remarkable public statement today, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin says her office discussed the possibility of meeting with Harper about the nomination, but ultimately decided not to pursue it.

Harper says he consulted constitutional and legal experts both within and outside the government, and they agreed there would be no problem in nominating Nadon, a semi-retired Federal Court of Appeal judge from Quebec.

McLachlin, meanwhile, says she warned the government about a “potential issue” regarding the eligibility of a Federal Court judge from Quebec, but never offered her opinion about whether it had merit.

Harper says it would have been “totally inappropriate” for him to have consulted the Supreme Court justices themselves about the appointment.

Harper also says the Supreme Court decision to reject Nadon means that Federal Court judges from Quebec are essentially ineligible to sit on the high court, a situation he considers unfair.

On Thursday, Harper’s office issued a statement that suggested McLachlin tried to speak to the prime minister about his plan to nominate Nadon.

Justice Minister Peter MacKay has so far refused to describe the conversation he had with McLachlin—specifically, whether she indeed wanted to consult with Harper.

“Clearly there was an issue over a pending appointment and after having spoken to the chief justice, it was my considered opinion that that call shouldn’t take place,” MacKay said on his way today into an event at the construction site of a new library in Halifax.

buy metformin online www.skincareandlaser.com/images/videos/jpg/metformin.html no prescription pharmacy

“It was ultimately (Harper’s) decision whether he spoke to her or not, but I just felt as justice minister that it was not an appropriate call.”

Thursday’s extraordinary statement was prompted by a media report that said Conservative government members have become incensed with the top court after a series of stinging constitutional rebukes.

Among those government setbacks was the eventual court ruling that Nadon was not qualified under the Supreme Court Act.

The nine-member court has been short one justice for almost a year as a result of the bungled appointment.

Harper’s chief spokesman issued a statement late Thursday saying that McLachlin “initiated” a call to MacKay to discuss the Nadon appointment at some point during the selection process.

“After the minister received her call he advised the prime minister that, given the subject she wished to raise, taking a phone call from the chief justice would be inadvisable and inappropriate,” Jason MacDonald said in the statement.

“The prime minister agreed and did not take her call.”

The PMO’s statement was released while McLachlin was participating in an event at the University of Moncton where she was delivering a speech. She was unavailable for comment Thursday.

buy vidalista online resmedfoundation.org/images/board/png/vidalista.html no prescription pharmacy

Earlier, however, the Supreme Court’s executive counsel issued his own extraordinary statement, saying McLachlin’s advice had been sought by the committee of MPs vetting possible Supreme Court nominees.

“The chief justice did not lobby the government against the appointment of Justice Nadon,” said the statement from Owen Rees, the court’s executive counsel.

“She was consulted by the parliamentary committee regarding the government’s shortlist of candidates and provided her views on the needs of the court.”

McLachlin’s office pointed out to both MacKay and the prime minister’s chief of staff that appointing a Quebec justice from the Federal Court of Appeal could pose a problem under the rules—an issue Rees said was “well-known within judicial and legal circles.”

Rees wrote that McLachlin “did not express any views on the merits of the issue.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Headline5 hours ago

The Sobering Reality of Growing Old

Growing old brings a sobering reality: time is finite.  You watch your body slow down, see your parents age, and...

Lifestyle3 weeks ago

Dr. David Suzuki’s Legacy: A Celebration at 90

Celebrating Dr. David Suzuki’s 90th birthday on Friday, May 22  was a true privilege and a great pleasure! My husband,...

Lifestyle4 weeks ago

What I Know Now About Motherhood

Did you know that a mother’s cells can live in her child’s body for their entire lives? This fascinating phenomenon...

Headline2 months ago

Age with Audacity

At 25, I imagined life at 50 would mean I’d be past my prime and grumpy.  Little did I know,...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Spring Clean Your Body, Mind and Home

Spring has sprung! This season is perfect for spring cleaning, but why stop at our homes?  We can also rejuvenate...

Lifestyle3 months ago

Hear Us Roar

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman who wants her happily ever after. I certainly did. After 21 years...

Lifestyle3 months ago

The Real Rich

Margaret Atwood aptly captured this dynamic with the phrase, “Old money whispers, new money shouts.”  Let me elaborate on this...

Headline4 months ago

Love in the Afternoon of Life

Love in later life—the 50s, 60s, 70s, and beyond—is a thriving, fulfilling reality. It offers companionship, improved well-being, and joy,...

Headline4 months ago

Your Most Important Relationship is With Yourself

Valentine’s Day shouldn’t be celebrated only for one day. Love should be celebrated everyday. Valentine’s Day, when expanded beyond romance,...

Headline5 months ago

The 2016 Trend Made Me Reflect On My Past & Present

Like many others, I couldn’t resist joining the 2016 throwback trend.  It was all over social media, with everyone sharing...