Connect with us

Breaking

Supreme Court recognizes co-ownership in same-sex relationships

Published

on

By Trisha Matabalan, Philippine Canadian Inquirer
February 10, 2026

Photo Courtesy: Supreme Court of the Philippines

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC) of the Philippines has ruled that “same-sex couples who live together may be recognized as co-owners of property under Article 148 of the Family Code, provided there is proof of actual contribution.”

This came about in a Decision written by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez as he granted a former partner’s complaint for partition of property and recognized her as a co-owner of the house and lot she shared with her same-sex partner.

While this does not mean these same-sex couples can legally marry, Article 148 ensures that their property relations and co-ownership are acknowledged based on how they’ve divided the household funds.

This has been an ongoing concern for homosexual couples. Without a law in the Philippines recognizing same-sex marriage or union, they do not receive the same rights that heterosexual couples do. The Supreme Court insists that their rights still be recognized as the court cannot resolve all related concerns, and that the Congress must be involved to “quest for solutions, which balance interests while maintaining fealty to fundamental freedoms. The process of legislation exposes the experience of homosexuals who have been oppressed, ensuring that they are understood by those who stand with the majority.”

Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen explains in his Concurring Opinion that Article 148 does not discriminate based on gender and thus, it can be applied to all forms of cohabitation. He emphasizes that a same-sex relationship is a normal relationship which must be covered, “otherwise, we render legally invisible some forms of legitimate intimate relationships.”

Furthermore, in her Concurrence, Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier says that Article 148 is broad enough to cover circumstances such as same-sex cohabitation. Therefore, the law should not only be limited to heterosexual relationships.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Lifestyle1 week ago

Dr. David Suzuki’s Legacy: A Celebration at 90

Celebrating Dr. David Suzuki’s 90th birthday on Friday, May 22  was a true privilege and a great pleasure! My husband,...

Lifestyle2 weeks ago

What I Know Now About Motherhood

Did you know that a mother’s cells can live in her child’s body for their entire lives? This fascinating phenomenon...

Headline1 month ago

Age with Audacity

At 25, I imagined life at 50 would mean I’d be past my prime and grumpy.  Little did I know,...

Lifestyle1 month ago

Spring Clean Your Body, Mind and Home

Spring has sprung! This season is perfect for spring cleaning, but why stop at our homes?  We can also rejuvenate...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Hear Us Roar

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman who wants her happily ever after. I certainly did. After 21 years...

Lifestyle3 months ago

The Real Rich

Margaret Atwood aptly captured this dynamic with the phrase, “Old money whispers, new money shouts.”  Let me elaborate on this...

Headline3 months ago

Love in the Afternoon of Life

Love in later life—the 50s, 60s, 70s, and beyond—is a thriving, fulfilling reality. It offers companionship, improved well-being, and joy,...

Headline4 months ago

Your Most Important Relationship is With Yourself

Valentine’s Day shouldn’t be celebrated only for one day. Love should be celebrated everyday. Valentine’s Day, when expanded beyond romance,...

Headline4 months ago

The 2016 Trend Made Me Reflect On My Past & Present

Like many others, I couldn’t resist joining the 2016 throwback trend.  It was all over social media, with everyone sharing...

Headline5 months ago

How To Be Healthier Realistically

It’s a brand-new year and a brand new you! If you’re like me who had been indulging quite a bit...