Connect with us

Canada News

Doctors should take part in acts of civil disobedience to advocate for patients

Published

on

Increasingly, many doctors find they must speak up and be advocates before a world that seemingly cares little for the lives and rights of their patients. (Pexels Photo)

By Wael Haddara, Western University, The Conversation

Physicians are expected to always act in the best interest of their patients. Increasingly, many doctors find they must speak up and be advocates before a world that seemingly cares little for the lives and rights of their patients.

In some cases, that advocacy has been in the form of civil disobedience against policies and laws seen to be unjust or inequitable. For example, a group of doctors in Québec recently took part in a one-day strike to protest Israel’s assault on Gaza.

However, civil disobedience by physicians is complicated. There’s an inherent, unresolved tension within the medical profession related to this form of advocacy. On the one hand, medicine is a profession of norms, rules, regulations, standards and tradition. On the other, there are often times of moral crisis that call on us to challenge norms, rules and expectations.

This tension is brought into sharp relief by the reaction of Canada’s medical establishment to acts of civil disobedience by physicians. Physicians risk censure by professional bodies, revocation of their licences to practice medicine and even job loss.

A notable example comes from Dr. Peter Bryce, who was forced into early retirement and died in relative obscurity after taking a principled position on the health of the Indigenous people, especially children in residential schools.

As the world continues to witness war and conflict, and as climate-related disasters impact the health and well-being of more people, the voices of doctors become increasingly vital.

What makes a good doctor?

The question of what makes a good doctor has been the focus of several educational, professional and regulatory medical bodies over the past number of decades. Descriptions of good doctors centre on values that the medical profession asserts are timeless and inherent, such as respect for patient autonomy and altruism.

A closer examination reveals that most of those values are not as inherent or timeless as the profession claims. Along with colleague, Prof. Lorelei Lingard, we’ve explored the claim that altruism is one of those values. We examined how the medical profession has demanded altruism over the years by exploring the Canadian Medical Association’s (CMA) codes of ethics over time.

The first CMA Code of Ethics was published in 1868, a year after Canadian Confederation, and revised regularly every few years. In all, we examined 19 versions of the code from 1868–2004. We read each version and identified altruistic content, and found that, while earlier codes — 1868 and 1922 for example — contained upwards of 12 altruistic statements, the 2004 code contained none.

We defined altruism as statements that urge physicians to place the interests of their patients ahead of their own.

In that sense, not only did the 2004 code contain no altruistic statements, it contained statements that asked physicians to put their own interests ahead of their patients’ interests, such as terminating the patient-doctor relationship and prioritizing one’s own health over their practice.

One discovery was particularly startling: Far from this being a recent phenomenon, the de-emphasis of altruism was gradual with major changes occurring in 1938 and in 1970.

For example, in 1928 the code stated that, in the event of epidemics, “when pestilence prevails,” physicians ought to attend to their patients, even at risk to their own lives. In the 1938 code, that statement disappears entirely. Over the course of the following 50 years, every one of the original altruistic statements was lost in one revision or another of the code.

The need for civil disobedience

The practice of medicine clearly changes over time, and yet at any given point, the medical establishment holds current practice to be not merely a constructed, socially negotiated set of practices, but as an immutable, almost divine writ. And those fundamental shifts have been the norm throughout the history of medicine. But, at every point, physicians are expected to conform to the standard of the day.

Shifts in medical values are not always for the better. We seem to conveniently ignore that physicians and the medical establishment were integral to many societally sanctioned acts of malfeasance or transgression. To be considered good, doctors must demonstrate obeisance to the prevailing norms and values of the day.

It was “good” Canadian doctors who participated in the forced sterilization of Indigenous women. “Good” American doctors in the 1950s knowingly failed to provide proper treatment to African American men with syphilis. And “good” German doctors attended in Nazi concentration camps.

This is why civil disobedience should be respected, not censured. Admittedly, it is difficult to codify “acceptable” civil disobedience, since it is, by definition a transgressive act. Acts of civil disobedience are anchored in individual morality.

In a culture where morality is increasingly individualized, agreeing on universal parameters to describe civil disobedience is likely an impossible undertaking. Additionally, codifying dissent risks draining its potency as a form of protest.

There have been attempts to set parameters for “acceptable” civil disobedience. Reasonableness is one such parameter. Others have proposed parameters like the existence of genuine injustice, exhaustion of legal channels and a reasonable prospect of success. However, all these parameters are a matter of subjectivity and are themselves areas of contention even within groups opposed to specific policies or practices.

By its very nature, civil resistance is not a risk-free endeavour. Legal institutions must continue to uphold the law. But regulatory agencies like licensing bodies and medical associations should not punish physicians for their acts of civil disobedience based on genuinely held moral beliefs.

It is perhaps unreasonable to expect establishment institutions to speak out against injustice, but when it comes to moral acts of personal sacrifice by their members, the least they can do is refrain from censuring those willing to speak out.The Conversation

Wael Haddara, Associate Professor of Medicine, Western University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Lifestyle2 days ago

The Tea on Vancouver’s Dating Scene

Before Maria in Vancouver met The Last One seven years ago and even long before she eventually married him (three...

Lifestyle1 month ago

How I Got My Groove Back

Life is not life if it’s just plain sailing! Real life is all about the ups and downs and most...

Lifestyle1 month ago

Upgrade Your Life in 2025

It’s a brand new year and a wonderful opportunity to become a brand new you! The word upgrade can mean...

Maria in Vancouver2 months ago

Fantabulous Christmas Party Ideas

It’s that special and merry time of the year when you get to have a wonderful excuse to celebrate amongst...

Lifestyle2 months ago

How To Do Christmas & Hanukkah This Year

Christmas 2024 is literally just around the corner! Here in Vancouver, we just finished celebrating Taylor Swift’s last leg of...

Lifestyle3 months ago

Nobody Wants This…IRL (In Real Life)

Just like everyone else who’s binged on Netflix series, “Nobody Wants This” — a romcom about a newly single rabbi...

Lifestyle3 months ago

Family Estrangement: Why It’s Okay

Family estrangement is the absence of a previously long-standing relationship between family members via emotional or physical distancing to the...

Lifestyle5 months ago

Becoming Your Best Version

By Matter Laurel-Zalko As a woman, I’m constantly evolving. I’m constantly changing towards my better version each year. Actually, I’m...

Lifestyle5 months ago

The True Power of Manifestation

I truly believe in the power of our imagination and that what we believe in our lives is an actual...

Maria in Vancouver6 months ago

DECORATE YOUR HOME 101

By Matte Laurel-Zalko Our home interiors are an insight into our brains and our hearts. It is our own collaboration...