Headline
PH always open to dialogue despite continuing WPS tension
Jay Batongbacal, director of the University of the Philippines Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea, said the government renounces war as an instrument of national policy.
“I think that what is the intention there is to essentially treat that incident as being on the same level as a misunderstanding or an accident at this point,” Batongbacal said at the Saturday News Forum in Quezon City.
“That would be useful to give space nga for a more deliberate effort to seek a diplomatic and peaceful solution para hindi mapusok or hindi premature iyong magiging reaction (to give space for a more deliberate effort to seek diplomatic and peaceful solution so that the reaction is not premature),” he added.
Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin had earlier said Malacanang is “not yet ready to classify” the June 17 incident as an armed attack as he noted that it could be a possible “misunderstanding or accident.”
Batongbacal agreed that not every unlawful act of a state is necessarily an act of war or start of formal hostilities between states.
“[I]n international law, there are rules and jurisprudence on this issue particularly in International Humanitarian Law and the laws of armed conflict. And in those rules or laws, incidents such as skirmishes, isolated skirmishes, geographically-isolated skirmishes may be considered as what legally might be classified as frontier incidents,” he said.
“These are not yet enough to be considered as an armed attack that warrants the engagement in self-defense or the right of self-defense and collective self-defense, also under the UN (United Nations) charter,” he said. “And the intention here is to give space also for diplomatic resolution of the disputes between states which have the skirmishes.”
The professor, however, clarified there is no justification for China’s aggressive actions since the government has repeatedly called the incident for what it is — illegal and barbaric.
Filipino soldiers were injured, including one whose right thumb was cut off.
“Ang importante ngayon ay nakita natin na nanindigan tayo na mali talaga ‘yong ginawa nila pero sa kabila noon, open pa rin tayo sa isang maayos na usapan kung paano ito ma-iresolba imbes na dire-diretso na tayo na bangayan, labanan, eventually gyera (What is important now is we are taking a stand to call their deed wrong and that despite that, we are still open to a proper dialogue instead of engaging into a fight and eventually, war),” he said.
“Para sa akin tama lang na as much as possible, we try to find a diplomatic solution (For me, it is right that as much as possible we try to find a diplomatic solution),” he added.
Batongbacal said China should seize the opportunity for dialogue if it is truly sincere about peace and “in trying to improve relations.”
He said the incident violated the principles of the UN charter and international law.
“Looking at it from an academic perspective, China has engaged in an unlawful use of force against the Philippines, particularly against Philippine troops and a sovereign vessel of the Philippines, the RHIB (rigid hull inflatable boats),” he said.
Diplomatic row
He said the Philippines should consider expelling some Chinese diplomats, starting with the defense attaché whom he believes failed “to open the line of communication” and make sure confrontations like the June 17 case do not happen.
“It will only be proper kasi hindi naman pwedeng walang consequence ‘yung ginawa nila (It will only be proper because there should be consequence to their actions). In fact, I would expel the diplomat but at the same time tell China to send somebody else and then we’ll talk,” Batongbacal suggested.
“Clearly, the current staff of the Embassy here, they’ve never helped and we cannot speak to China through them because there is absolutely no trust with respect to that staff. If they want to start fresh, they should replace the people,” he added.
No need for foreign escort
In the same press conference, National Task Force for the West Philippine Sea (NTF-WPS) spokesperson Commodore Jay Tarriela acknowledged that China’s objective from the start was to disrupt the Philippines’ rotation and resupply (RORE) operations.
He said the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) will continue with RORE missions to BRP Sierra Madre.
He said the government remains undeterred as these are regular and legitimate operations that a country conducts within its maritime zones.
The announcement of the operations would depend on President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.
In addition, Tarriela said the NTF-WPS does not see the need to tap other nations as escorts for the resupply missions.
“Right now, naniniwala tayo sa National Task Force West Philippine Sea na ang atin pong kasundaluhan, Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine Coast Guard, have the capability to still conduct our resupply mission (Right now, we at the NTF-WPS believe that our AFP and the PCG have the capability to still conduct our resupply mission),” he said.
“Ito po ay isang lehitimo at ordinaryong operasyon na ginagawa natin ((This is a legitimate and ordinary operation). And right now, we don’t see any reason, that we will be requesting any foreign actors to support our ordinary and routine resupply mission to BRP Sierra Madre,” he added.