Canada News
Ottawa to force banks to use carbon rebate label for direct deposits
Guilbeault said the lack of a clear identifier isn’t the only thing driving confusion about carbon pricing, but is definitely part of the problem. (File Photo: Steven Guilbeault/Facebook)
Change to the law would affect all government deposits
Mia Rabson (new window) · The Canadian Press
Canadian banks that refuse to identify the carbon rebate by name when doing direct deposits are forcing the government to change the law to make them do it, says Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault.
Tuesday’s federal budget promised to amend the Financial Administration Act to ensure that government payments accepted for deposit at Canadian banks will carry whatever title the government wants.
The fact that they haven’t been doing it now for many years led us to take this position,
Guilbeault said.
His department has been battling with banks for almost two years over how carbon rebates are labelled when they are deposited directly into bank accounts.
The first rebate deposits in 2022 were labelled very generically — federal payment
and EFT Canada,
for example — which meant recipients had no idea why they were getting the money.
Some banks, but not all, have since amended their procedures to ensure bank statements reflect the measure’s new name — the Canada Carbon Rebate.
TD and BMO have adopted the government’s requested CdaCarbonRebate
entry, which fits the 15-character limit imposed by some banks.
RBC and Scotiabank, however, were unable to make the change in time for the rollout, although both say they intend to update to the new name.
CIBC, meanwhile, is still calling it Deposit Canada.
- 2024 federal budget’s key takeaways: Housing and carbon rebates, students and sin taxes (new window)
- Freeland’s new federal budget hikes taxes on the rich to cover billions in new spending (new window)
Guilbeault said the lack of a clear identifier isn’t the only thing driving confusion about carbon pricing, but is definitely part of the problem.
I think we took it for granted that since people were receiving it, people knew they were receiving it,
he said.
We’ve come to discover over the last few months that it wasn’t the case, in part because it the way it was labelled — or mislabelled, I should say — by most financial institutions.
The government has struggled to fully explain the carbon price and the rebates since the policy began in 2019.
That has helped the Conservatives, fastidiously opposed to carbon pricing, in their unrelenting efforts to kill it once and for all.
Changing the law wouldn’t just affect carbon rebates, but all government deposits, including child benefits, employment insurance and tax refunds.
Guilbeault rejected any suggestion the change would cost the banks money.
You can quote me on this: I have a really hard time believing the banks when they say that it’s going to cost them money,
he said.
I feel that, as a client, we should have the right to label this the way we feel it should be labelled and it’s not up to the banks to decide.
A spokesperson for the Canadian Bankers Association had little to say about the proposed change.
Banks in Canada support measures that help build a strong and sustainable Canadian economy,
Maggie Cheung said in a written statement.
We will also review proposed amendments to the Financial Administration Act when they are presented, and what proposed changes to the Act would mean for banks and Canadians.
This article is republished from RCI.
