Connect with us

News

Congress has authority to re-impose death penalty: Panelo

Published

on

FILE: Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo (Photo: RODRIGUEZ/PPD)

FILE: Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo (Photo: RODRIGUEZ/PPD)

MANILA — Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo on Thursday said Congress had the authority to re-impose the death penalty if there were compelling reasons involving heinous crimes.

Panelo made this comment as the Senate announced its resumption of hearings on the revival of the death penalty within this month.

He said that while Section 19 of Article III of the 1987 Constitution prohibited the imposition of the death penalty, the same provision authorized the Congress to pass a law which re-imposed death penalty “for compelling reason involving heinous crimes.”

“In other words, the Congress has the authority to re-impose the death penalty, provided that, it finds compelling reasons involving heinous crimes therefor,” Panelo said in a press statement.

Contrary to critics’ claims, Panelo explained that re-imposition of the penalty was not inconsistent with the Philippines’ treaty obligations including under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

“The said instrument allows the imposition of the death penalty and only limits its application to the most serious crimes,” he said.

He also explained that treaties could not be in conflict with the country’s Constitution which “has higher authority over any legal instrument whether it be passed or ratified by the Congress.”

Panelo said while the second optional protocol of the ICCPR mandated the abolition of death penalty, the ICCPR still could not, however, prevail over Congress’ authority to re-impose capital punishment.

“Treaties ratified and incorporated and made part of the law of the land are only given equal standing with, and are not superior to our laws,” Panelo said.

“Hence, like any other law, a treaty may be repealed by a later act of Congress if it deems that such is warranted under the present circumstances or is violative of our Constitution,” he added.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Lifestyle1 day ago

Never Settle For Less Than You Are

Before I became a mother, before I became a wife, before I became a business partner to my husband, I...

Lifestyle2 weeks ago

Celebrating My Womanhood

The month of March is all about celebrating women and what better way to celebrate it than by enjoying and...

Lifestyle1 month ago

Maria’s Funny Valentine With An Ex!

Maria in Vancouver can’t help but wonder: when will she ever flip her negative thoughts to positive thoughts when it...

Lifestyle1 month ago

The Tea on Vancouver’s Dating Scene

Before Maria in Vancouver met The Last One seven years ago and even long before she eventually married him (three...

Lifestyle2 months ago

How I Got My Groove Back

Life is not life if it’s just plain sailing! Real life is all about the ups and downs and most...

Lifestyle3 months ago

Upgrade Your Life in 2025

It’s a brand new year and a wonderful opportunity to become a brand new you! The word upgrade can mean...

Maria in Vancouver3 months ago

Fantabulous Christmas Party Ideas

It’s that special and merry time of the year when you get to have a wonderful excuse to celebrate amongst...

Lifestyle4 months ago

How To Do Christmas & Hanukkah This Year

Christmas 2024 is literally just around the corner! Here in Vancouver, we just finished celebrating Taylor Swift’s last leg of...

Lifestyle4 months ago

Nobody Wants This…IRL (In Real Life)

Just like everyone else who’s binged on Netflix series, “Nobody Wants This” — a romcom about a newly single rabbi...

Lifestyle5 months ago

Family Estrangement: Why It’s Okay

Family estrangement is the absence of a previously long-standing relationship between family members via emotional or physical distancing to the...