Connect with us

Business and Economy

CA junks PCC plea on review of PLDT, Globe PHP70-B buyout of SMC telco assets

Published

on

The Court of Appeals denied the petition of motion for reconsideration filed by Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) in relation to the review of the the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT) and Globe Telecommunications’ PHP70-billion buyout deal of the telco assets of San Miguel Corporation (SMC). (Photo by Ramon FVelasquez (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0)

The Court of Appeals denied the petition of motion for reconsideration filed by Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) in relation to the review of the the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT) and Globe Telecommunications’ PHP70-billion buyout deal of the telco assets of San Miguel Corporation (SMC). (Photo by Ramon FVelasquez (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0)

MANILA—The Court of Appeals denied the petition of motion for reconsideration filed by Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) in relation to the review of the the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT) and Globe Telecommunications’ PHP70-billion buyout deal of the telco assets of San Miguel Corporation (SMC).

In a resolution dated Feb. 17, 2017 but was released to media on Thursday, penned by Associate Justice Ramon M. Bato Sr. and was concurred by Justices Maria Elisa Sempio Dy and Henri Jean Paul Inting, the CA’s 12th Division, denied PCC’s motion for reconsideration of its August 26 resolution as it stood by its findings that the existence of all the requisites for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction has been established by PLDT and Globe.

Last August 26, 2016, the CA issued a writ of preliminary injunction against PCC and its agents from conducting any investigation which would impair the rights of PLDT, Globe and SMC.

The injunction was issued in order not to affect the rights of the consumers and to protect the move to improve the interned speed and connection nationwide.

The petitioners, according to the CA, were able to establish the existence of a clear positive right that needs judicial protection during the pendency of the main case.

They argued that the deal has been deemed approved by operation of law since they have fully complied with the terms of the transitory circulars issued by the PCC.

PLDT said its wireless subsidiary Smart has been implementing the transaction and using the frequencies as part of its nationwide rollout.

They warned that a reversal of the transaction will result in “irreparable and incalculable injury to the public service.”

“We agree with PLDT that there is an urgent and paramount necessity to enjoin PCC from proceeding with the pre-acquisition review and/or investigation to prevent serious and irreparable damage to PLDT whose credit standing is at risk and its ability to borrow funds to fully roll out the previously unused/idle 700MHz spectrum may be jeopardized and unduly exposed it to violate the conditions imposed by NTC thereby impeding the three-year program of providing faster/reliable/affordable mobile data/internet to the consuming public all over the country,” the CA pointed out.

The CA noted that the utilization of the previously unused 700MHz by PLDT and Globe under a co-use agreement approved by the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) will greatly benefit the public.

The CA also branded as “misplaced” PCC’s contention that the issuance of the injunction effectively disposed of the case on the merits.

“We have to stress that the Court’s determination of the existence of all the requisites for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction is interlocutory and preliminary in nature. The granting of a writ of preliminary injunction is an interlocutory order because it does not dispose of the main case,” the CA held.

It will be recalled that PCC, in its Letters dated June 7 and June 17, 2016, it ordered the pre-acquisition review and investigation of the acquisition made by PLDT and Globe of all the issuing and outstanding shares and assets of Vega Telecom Inc., a subsidiary of SMC.

Pursuant to the Sale and Purchase Agreement executed on May 30, 2016, for an agreed purchase price of PHP52,080,764,982 under a deferred payment scheme (the sum of PHP26,040,382,490 was paid upon the execution of the contract, PHP13,020,191,246 to be paid on December 1, 2016 and PHP13,020,191,246 to be paid on May 30, 2017).

Both PLDT and Globe purchased on an equal sharing or 50-50 basis the entire issued and outstanding shares of stock of VTI.

The PCC Letters issued against both PLDT and Globe was hailed to the CA seeking to stop the former with its orders.

Also in resolution, CA issued a gag order directing it to remove immediately from its website its Preliminary Statement of Concern (PSOC) which contained an initial finding that the deal “is likely to substantially prevent, restrict and lessen competition” within the telco industry.

Likewise, the appellate court directed PCC, PLDT and Globe to cease and desist from issuing public comments and statements that would violate the sub judice rule and subject them to indirect contempt of the court.

“Applying the sub judice rule, PCC should immediately remove its PSOC posted in its website and refrain from making comments on the subject acquisition while the case is pending in court,” the resolution stated.

“Likewise, to be fair, PLDT should also refrain from making comments on the subject acquisition and desist from communicating their opinion to the public during the pendency of this case,” it added.

The gag order was issued upon the motion filed by PLDT where it claimed that the publication of the PSOC violates Republic Act No. 10667 which considers confidential the deliberations and investigation conducted by PCC.

The PLDT alleged that PCC’s continuing communication with the media to drum up public sympathy violates the sub judice rule.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maria in Vancouver

Lifestyle5 days ago

Celebrating My Womanhood

The month of March is all about celebrating women and what better way to celebrate it than by enjoying and...

Lifestyle4 weeks ago

Maria’s Funny Valentine With An Ex!

Maria in Vancouver can’t help but wonder: when will she ever flip her negative thoughts to positive thoughts when it...

Lifestyle1 month ago

The Tea on Vancouver’s Dating Scene

Before Maria in Vancouver met The Last One seven years ago and even long before she eventually married him (three...

Lifestyle2 months ago

How I Got My Groove Back

Life is not life if it’s just plain sailing! Real life is all about the ups and downs and most...

Lifestyle2 months ago

Upgrade Your Life in 2025

It’s a brand new year and a wonderful opportunity to become a brand new you! The word upgrade can mean...

Maria in Vancouver3 months ago

Fantabulous Christmas Party Ideas

It’s that special and merry time of the year when you get to have a wonderful excuse to celebrate amongst...

Lifestyle3 months ago

How To Do Christmas & Hanukkah This Year

Christmas 2024 is literally just around the corner! Here in Vancouver, we just finished celebrating Taylor Swift’s last leg of...

Lifestyle4 months ago

Nobody Wants This…IRL (In Real Life)

Just like everyone else who’s binged on Netflix series, “Nobody Wants This” — a romcom about a newly single rabbi...

Lifestyle4 months ago

Family Estrangement: Why It’s Okay

Family estrangement is the absence of a previously long-standing relationship between family members via emotional or physical distancing to the...

Lifestyle6 months ago

Becoming Your Best Version

By Matter Laurel-Zalko As a woman, I’m constantly evolving. I’m constantly changing towards my better version each year. Actually, I’m...