{"id":99783,"date":"2017-04-25T19:59:17","date_gmt":"2017-04-25T23:59:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=99783"},"modified":"2017-04-25T19:59:17","modified_gmt":"2017-04-25T23:59:17","slug":"house-leaders-slam-complaint-vs-duterte-before-icc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/04\/25\/house-leaders-slam-complaint-vs-duterte-before-icc\/","title":{"rendered":"House leaders slam complaint vs Duterte before ICC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Two<\/a>
Two leaders of the House of Representatives on Tuesday criticized the filing of a case against President Rodrigo Duterte before the International Criminal Court (ICC), dismissing it as another attempt to discredit the government. (Photo: Philippine News Agency<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA\u2013Two leaders of the House of Representatives on Tuesday criticized the filing of a case against President Rodrigo Duterte before the International Criminal Court (ICC), dismissing it as another attempt to discredit the government.<\/p>\n

House Appropriations Committee chair and Davao City Rep. Karlo Nograles said the complaint, which was filed by self-confessed hitman Edgar Matobato\u2019s lawyer Jude Sabio, is part of a \u201cploy\u201d to put the President in a bad light before the international community.<\/p>\n

Nograles pointed out that the complaint has no \u201creal legal basis\u201d and \u201cbereft of any hard evidence\u201d for the prosecution of President Duterte over crimes against humanity.<\/p>\n

“The case filed against the President in the ICC, as most Filipinos know, is the latest step in the destabilization plot against the Duterte administration. This is complete waste of time because any lawyer would say there is no basis to prosecute the president for alleged crimes against humanity,” Nograles said.<\/p>\n

The Davao City lawmaker said the objective of the filing of the case is to topple the Duterte administration and generate sympathy to weaken the Chief Executive\u2019s \u201coverwhelming popular support\u201d.<\/p>\n

Nograles said the ICC has no jurisdiction to prosecute the President because existing Philippine courts remain \u201cvery credible and functional\u201d.<\/p>\n

“The legal and judicial system in the Philippines is functional and equipped enough to deal with the complaints. It’s not as if we are so helpless and powerless a state that we need the ICC to come in and acquire jurisdiction over us,” he explained.<\/p>\n

For his part, House Dangerous Drugs Committee chair and Surigao del Norte Rep. Ace Barbers dismissed the complaint as a “propaganda for self-aggrandizement.”<\/p>\n

“The International Criminal Court complaint is nothing more but an attempt to grab the headlines and enjoy his three minutes of fame at the expense of President Duterte and Speaker Alvarez and all other accused,\u201d said Barbers.<\/p>\n

Barbers noted that the complaint is \u201cbereft of merit\u201d and insufficient in evidence considering that there is no direct link proving that the President committed the crimes being charged against him.<\/p>\n

“Atty. Sabio offered as evidence the findings of the Human Rights Watch, one that is not even a fact-finding body,” Barbers added.<\/p>\n

The Surigao del Norte solon said that despite plots to besmirch the current administration ahead of the country\u2019s hosting of the ASEAN Summit, Duterte still enjoys solid public support and his reputation is as \u201dsolid as the Rock of Gibraltar\u201d.<\/p>\n

Sabio filed a 77-page complaint against the Chief Executive and 11 senior government officials before the ICC on Monday, accusing them of crimes against humanity through administration\u2019s aggressive campaign against illegal drugs.<\/p>\n

Sabio, in his complaint, cited the similarities in the drug war when Duterte was mayor and now as president including police participation, element of hitman, reward system for killing, reward in cash, a kill list, among others.<\/p>\n

Sabio said that with the case filed, the Office of the Prosecutor is set to determine whether the case is within the jurisdiction of the ICC and if it is proper to file criminal charges against the accused, before investigating the case and issuing Warrant of Arrest against them.<\/p>\n

Aside from Duterte, also charged for violating different provisions of the Rome Statute, to wit: Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre; Police Director General Ronald dela Rosa; Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez of the House of Representatives; Former Interior and Local Government Secretary Ismael Sueno; Police Superintendent Edilberto Leonardo; Senior Police Officer 4 Sanson \u201cSonny\u201d Buenaventura; Police Supt. Royina Garma; National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Director Dante Gierran; Solicitor General Jose Calida; Senator Richard Gordon and Senator Alan Peter S. Cayetano.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u2013Two leaders of the House of Representatives on Tuesday criticized the filing of a case against President Rodrigo Duterte before …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":99784,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95,483],"tags":[10324,15032,16666],"class_list":["post-99783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","category-politics","tag-complaint","tag-house-leaders","tag-icc-case","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99783\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/99784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}