{"id":97989,"date":"2017-04-11T20:16:20","date_gmt":"2017-04-12T00:16:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=97989"},"modified":"2017-04-11T20:16:20","modified_gmt":"2017-04-12T00:16:20","slug":"robredos-satisfaction-rating-drops","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/04\/11\/robredos-satisfaction-rating-drops\/","title":{"rendered":"Robredo\u2019s satisfaction rating drops"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_97990\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-97990\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Leni-Robredo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-97990\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Leni-Robredo.jpg\" alt=\"Vice President Leni Robredo. (Photo courtesy of Robredo's Facebook)\" width=\"960\" height=\"635\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Leni-Robredo.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Leni-Robredo-300x198.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Leni-Robredo-768x508.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-97990\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Vice President Leni Robredo. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LeniRobredoPH\" target=\"_blank\">Photo<\/a> courtesy of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LeniRobredoPH\/photos\/a.288539781263697.66683.283945495056459\/1242672132517119\/?type=3&amp;theater\" target=\"_blank\">Robredo&#8217;s Facebook page<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A recent Social Weather Station (SWS) survey showed that Vice President Leni Robredo\u2019s public satisfaction rating dropped by 11 percentage points.<\/p>\n<p>In an in-person survey conducted on March 25-28 to 1, 200 Filipinos, 53 percent of the respondents said that they were satisfied with the Vice President\u2019s performance while 27 percent felt the opposite. Nineteen percent were undecided.<\/p>\n<p>Robredo received a net rating of +26 which is \u201cmoderate\u201d. Net rating is the difference of the satisfied and dissatisfied net ratings.<\/p>\n<p>Robredo\u2019s +26 net satisfaction rating is the lowest she has gotten since she was first rated as Vice President. In September 2016, she received a net satisfaction rating of +49 (good). By the end of 2016, her rating slid to +37, a percentage still considered as \u201cgood\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Robredo\u2019s camp interpreted the Vice President\u2019s lower net satisfaction rating as a reminder for her to \u201creach out\u201d to more Filipinos.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese results are a steady reminder that there are more families and communities to reach out to,\u201d Georgina Hernandez, Spokesperson for the Vice President said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe take every survey as a continuing challenge to do better and make a bigger difference in the lives of the marginalized,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are grateful for the continued trust of our fellow Filipinos in the recent SWS satisfaction ratings. The support of the majority is an encouragement to Vice President Leni Robredo, who is working with communities and partners to address poverty around the country,\u201d Hernandez said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent Social Weather Station (SWS) survey showed that Vice President Leni Robredo\u2019s public satisfaction rating dropped by 11 percentage &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":97990,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-katherine-padilla","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97989\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/97990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}