{"id":96855,"date":"2017-04-04T22:53:12","date_gmt":"2017-04-05T02:53:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=96855"},"modified":"2017-04-04T22:53:12","modified_gmt":"2017-04-05T02:53:12","slug":"chelsea-clinton-on-book-tour-in-no-hurry-to-enter-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/04\/04\/chelsea-clinton-on-book-tour-in-no-hurry-to-enter-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Chelsea Clinton, on book tour, in no hurry to enter politics"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_96856\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-96856\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/12829436_763370217096201_2585911955799687704_o.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-96856\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/12829436_763370217096201_2585911955799687704_o.jpg\" alt=\"For now, Chelsea Clinton insists she's focused far less on her political future than on burnishing her profile as an author of children's books. (Photo: Chelsea Clinton\/Facebook)\" width=\"640\" height=\"960\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/12829436_763370217096201_2585911955799687704_o.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/12829436_763370217096201_2585911955799687704_o-200x300.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-96856\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">For now, Chelsea Clinton insists she&#8217;s focused far less on her political future than on burnishing her profile as an author of children&#8217;s books. (Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/chelseaclinton\/photos\/a.123550004411562.16370.103551633078066\/763370217096201\/?type=1&amp;theater\">Chelsea Clinton\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NEW YORK \u2014 Congresswoman Clinton? President Clinton?<\/p>\n<p>For now, Chelsea Clinton insists she&#8217;s focused far less on her political future than on burnishing her profile as an author of children&#8217;s books.<\/p>\n<p>The former first daughter embarked Tuesday on a six-state book tour that was scheduled back when she believed her mother was on the way to the White House. But with Hillary Clinton&#8217;s political career possibly over following a devastating presidential election loss to Donald Trump, people can&#8217;t stop speculating about whether the younger Clinton intends to take up the family business.<\/p>\n<p>Those closest to Chelsea Clinton say she maintains a passion for public service but has only just begun to contemplate her role in a future that doesn&#8217;t include President Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere&#8217;s lots of TBDs in Chelsea&#8217;s future,\u201d Clinton chief of staff Bari Lurie said, using the acronym for \u201cto be determined.\u201d \u201cBut right now she&#8217;s very clear: One of those TBDs is not running for office.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s been no internal polling about her political prospects, no private discussions with political consultants. No one scheduled the book tour \u2014 to promote the paperback release of \u201cIt&#8217;s Your World,\u201d aimed at middle-school students \u2014 thinking it would be an effective vehicle to launch a political run. She&#8217;s also preparing to release in May an illustrated children&#8217;s book that celebrates female leaders.<\/p>\n<p>Chelsea Clinton was blunt in a Tuesday interview with \u201cCBS This Morning\u201d but left the door open a crack when asked whether she was running for public office.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo, no, no,\u201d Clinton said, noting that she&#8217;s pleased with her state and local public officials in New York.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI clearly don&#8217;t agree with our president, but I&#8217;m definitely not the right person to run to defeat him in 2020,\u201d she continued. \u201cSo right now, the answer is no. But I think we all need to be asking ourselves that question periodically.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At the opening stop in her book tour Tuesday, the 37-year-old Clinton told those gathered in a crowded Manhattan bookstore she was just 3 or 4 the first time someone asked if she would run for office.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it&#8217;s actually a gift to be asked that question,\u201d she said, suggesting everyone should be encouraged to seek public office.<\/p>\n<p>The comments come as her mother&#8217;s political standing reaches new lows. In December, more than 60 per cent of Democrats and independents said Hillary Clinton shouldn&#8217;t run again for office, according to a Suffolk University\/USA Today poll.<\/p>\n<p>Political operatives in New York say Chelsea Clinton, who lives in Manhattan, may have more options than her mother&#8217;s poor numbers suggest.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe brand here is still pretty strong,\u201d said Jefrey Pollock, a New York-based Democratic pollster, referring to the liberal city and its suburbs. \u201cFor right now, if there&#8217;s a future, it&#8217;s going to be something more local than national.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And while Tuesday&#8217;s book tour stop was sold out, there were signs of Clinton fatigue even among the New York Democrats lined up early to get good seats.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDemocrats need a leader,\u201d said Susan Conrad, an artist. \u201cI don&#8217;t see Chelsea as that person.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Conrad&#8217;s friend Gillian Wells agreed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI&#8217;m glad she&#8217;s staying in the public eye. But this would not be a good time for her to run,\u201d the interior architect said. \u201cMaybe in a few years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Chelsea Clinton continues to serve as vice chairwoman of the board at the Clinton Foundation, an unpaid position that puts her at the centre of decisions about the foundation&#8217;s future. Among other responsibilities, she plays an active role in fundraising, promotion and program evaluation.<\/p>\n<p>She&#8217;s also teaching a class on global health governance at Columbia University and recently joined the board of the internet travel site Expedia.<\/p>\n<p>And she&#8217;s eager to speak out against the Republican president&#8217;s policies.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, she warned during a televised fundraiser for the American Civil Liberties Union that Republican-backed voter ID laws are threatening the right to vote.<\/p>\n<p>Over the weekend, she tweeted a link to the Los Angeles Times headline \u201cOur Dishonest President.\u201d And on Monday, she posted a message to her 1.6 million Twitter followers highlighting the Trump administration&#8217;s plan to cut funding at the Environmental Protection Agency.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe&#8217;s made it very clear: &#8216;I can care deeply and fight for issues I&#8217;m passionate about and not be running for public office,\u201d&#8217; Lurie said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK \u2014 Congresswoman Clinton? President Clinton? For now, Chelsea Clinton insists she&#8217;s focused far less on her political future &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":96856,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,16,17],"tags":[270],"class_list":["post-96855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news","category-news-w","tag-chelsea-clinton","mauthors-steve-peoples","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96855"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96855\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/96856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}