{"id":96220,"date":"2017-04-01T04:45:47","date_gmt":"2017-04-01T08:45:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=96220"},"modified":"2017-04-01T04:45:47","modified_gmt":"2017-04-01T08:45:47","slug":"govt-tepco-appeal-case-claiming-negligence-in-nuclear-crisis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/04\/01\/govt-tepco-appeal-case-claiming-negligence-in-nuclear-crisis\/","title":{"rendered":"Gov&#8217;t, TEPCO appeal case claiming negligence in nuclear crisis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><figure id=\"attachment_96221\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-96221\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Fukushima-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-96221\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Fukushima-1.jpg\" alt=\"The central government and operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex appealed on Thursday a court ruling that found them negligent for insufficient anti-tsunami measures at the plant so badly affected by the March 2011 disaster. (Photo by The original uploader was KEI at Japanese Wikipedia (Transferred from ja.wikipedia to Commons.) [GFDL (http:\/\/www.gnu.org\/copyleft\/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/)])\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Fukushima-1.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Fukushima-1-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-96221\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The central government and operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex appealed on Thursday a court ruling that found them negligent for insufficient anti-tsunami measures at the plant so badly affected by the March 2011 disaster. (Photo by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File%3AFukushima-1.JPG\">The original uploader was KEI at Japanese Wikipedia (Transferred from ja.wikipedia to Commons.) [GFDL (http:\/\/www.gnu.org\/copyleft\/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/)]<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>TOKYO\u2014The central government and operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex appealed on Thursday a court ruling that found them negligent for insufficient anti-tsunami measures at the plant so badly affected by the March 2011 disaster.<\/p>\n<p>The state and Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. respectively filed an appeal with the Tokyo High Court over the Maebashi District Court&#8217;s decision on March 17, the first ruling of its kind since the nuclear crisis following the devastating earthquake and tsunami.<\/p>\n<p>Apart from finding the government and TEPCO negligent, the district court awarded a total of 38.55 million yen (USD340,000) in damages to 62 people who fled Fukushima Prefecture, including some who voluntarily evacuated.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TOKYO\u2014The central government and operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex appealed on Thursday a court ruling that found &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":96221,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,16,17],"tags":[17284],"class_list":["post-96220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news","category-news-w","tag-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96220\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/96221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}