{"id":96027,"date":"2017-03-30T01:09:20","date_gmt":"2017-03-30T05:09:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=96027"},"modified":"2017-03-30T01:09:20","modified_gmt":"2017-03-30T05:09:20","slug":"us-judge-questions-government-on-narrowing-travel-ban-block","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/03\/30\/us-judge-questions-government-on-narrowing-travel-ban-block\/","title":{"rendered":"US judge questions government on narrowing travel ban block"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_94201\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-94201\" style=\"width: 275px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/DKW_275x367.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-94201\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/DKW_275x367.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson heard arguments on whether to extend his temporary order until Hawaii's lawsuit works its way through the courts. He said he would issue a written ruling by day's end.(Photo: United State District Court)\" width=\"275\" height=\"367\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/DKW_275x367.jpg 275w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/DKW_275x367-225x300.jpg 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 275px) 100vw, 275px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-94201\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson heard arguments on whether to extend his temporary order until Hawaii&#8217;s lawsuit works its way through the courts. He said he would issue a written ruling by day&#8217;s end.(Photo: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hid.uscourts.gov\">United State District Court<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>HONOLULU \u2013A federal judge in Hawaii questioned a government attorney Wednesday who urged him to narrow his order blocking President Donald Trump&#8217;s travel ban after arguing that a freeze on the nation&#8217;s refugee program had no effect on the state.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson heard arguments on whether to extend his temporary order until Hawaii&#8217;s lawsuit works its way through the courts. He said he would issue a written ruling by day&#8217;s end.<\/p>\n<p>Hawaii says the policy discriminates against Muslims and hurts the state&#8217;s economy. The implied message in the revised ban is like a \u201cneon sign flashing &#8216;Muslim Ban, Muslim Ban\u201d&#8217; that the government didn&#8217;t bother to turn off, state Attorney General Douglas Chin told the judge.<\/p>\n<p>The government says the ban falls within the president&#8217;s power to protect national security. Hawaii has only made generalized concerns about its effect on students and tourism, Department of Justice attorney Chad Readler said Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>Participating by telephone, Readler asked Watson to be guided by narrower rulings blocking only the part of Trump&#8217;s executive order that suspends new visas for people from six Muslim-majority countries.<\/p>\n<p>Watson said the government only argued for the narrower interpretation after a federal judge in Maryland blocked the six-nation travel ban but not the suspension of the refugee program. That judge said it wasn&#8217;t clear that the refugee freeze was similarly motivated by religious bias.<\/p>\n<p>Watson noted that the government said 20 refugees were resettled in Hawaii since 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs this a mathematical exercise that 20 isn&#8217;t enough? &#8230; What do I make of that?\u201d the judge asked Readler.<\/p>\n<p>The government attorney replied that 20 is simply a small number of refugees.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn whose judgment?\u201d Watson asked.<\/p>\n<p>constitutional harm exists regardless of the number of people affected or for how long, Hawaii&#8217;s attorney general said.<\/p>\n<p>In his arguments, Chin quoted Trump&#8217;s comments that the revised travel ban is a \u201cwatered down\u201d version of the original.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe cannot fault the president for being politically incorrect, but we do fault him for being constitutionally incorrect,\u201d Chin said.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this month, Watson prevented the federal government from suspending new visas for people from Somalia, Iran, Syria, Sudan, Libya and Yemen and freezing the nation&#8217;s refugee program. His ruling came just hours before the federal government planned to start enforcing Trump&#8217;s executive order.<\/p>\n<p>The judge, nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2012, had agreed with Hawaii that the ban would hurt the state&#8217;s tourism-dependent economy and that it discriminates based on nationality and religion.<\/p>\n<p>Trump called Watson&#8217;s ruling an example of \u201cunprecedented judicial overreach.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hawaii&#8217;s ruling would not be directly affected by a decision siding with the federal government in the Maryland case, legal experts said. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals set a hearing for May 8 to consider the administration&#8217;s appeal.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat a ruling in 4th Circuit in favour of the administration would do is create a split in authority between federal courts in different parts of the country,\u201d said Richard Primus, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Michigan law school.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCases with splits in authority are cases the U.S. Supreme Court exists to resolve,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HONOLULU \u2013A federal judge in Hawaii questioned a government attorney Wednesday who urged him to narrow his order blocking President &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":94201,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[14087,13457,17233],"class_list":["post-96027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","tag-president-donald-trump","tag-travel-ban","tag-us-judge","mauthors-jennifer-sinco-kelleher","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96027\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/94201"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}