{"id":94207,"date":"2017-03-16T00:38:59","date_gmt":"2017-03-16T04:38:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=94207"},"modified":"2017-03-16T00:38:59","modified_gmt":"2017-03-16T04:38:59","slug":"trump-announces-challenge-to-obama-era-fuel-standards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/03\/16\/trump-announces-challenge-to-obama-era-fuel-standards\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump announces challenge to Obama era fuel standards"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"President<\/a>
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that his administration will re-examine federal requirements governing the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks, moving forcefully against Obama-era environmental regulations that Trump says are stifling economic growth. (Photo: Donald J. Trump\/ Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

YPSILANTI, Mich. \u2013President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that his administration will re-examine federal requirements governing the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks, moving forcefully against Obama-era environmental regulations that Trump says are stifling economic growth.<\/p>\n

Trump revealed his plans during a speech at an automotive testing centre near Detroit, where he also met with auto company executives and workers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is going to be a new era for American jobs and job creation,\u201d Trump said at a round-table meeting.<\/p>\n

The EPA under Obama had promulgated a rule for cars and trucks requiring a fleet-wide average of 36 mpg in real-world driving by 2025.<\/p>\n

Trump’s decision, while having no immediate effect, requires the Environmental Protection Agency to determine no later than April 2018 whether the 2022-2025 standards established are appropriate. If the EPA determines they are not appropriate, the agency will submit a new proposal next year.<\/p>\n

\u201cMy administration will work tirelessly to eliminate the industry-killing regulations, to lower the job-crushing taxes and to ensure a level playing field for all American companies and workers,\u201d Trump said at the American Center for Mobility, which produced B-24 bombers during World War II and is being converted into an automotive testing and product development facility.<\/p>\n

Trump’s announcement is expected to set the stage for weaker fuel efficiency standards as well as drawn-out legal battles with environmental groups and states such as California that adopted their own tough tailpipe standards for drivers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese standards are costly for automakers and the American people,\u201d said EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. He promised a \u201cthorough review\u201d that will \u201chelp ensure this national program is good for consumers and good for the environment<\/p>\n

California Gov. Jerry Brown accused Trump and Pruitt of trying to weaken auto-emission standards in what he called \u201can unconscionable gift to polluters.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brown and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced their states are intervening in a lawsuit challenging the EPA rule. New York is among more than a dozen, mostly Northeastern states that have adopted California standards.<\/p>\n

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers \u2013which represents a dozen major car manufacturers including General Motors, Ford, Fiat Chrysler and Toyota \u2013praised Trump’s action. It said he was creating an opportunity for federal and state officials to \u201creach a thoughtful and co-ordinated outcome predicated on the best and most current data.\u201d<\/p>\n

Environmental groups said Trump and his team appeared intent on easing gas-mileage requirements set by Obama.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf they succeed we’ll pay more at the pump, depend more on oil from bad countries, drive up the trade deficit and pollute our kids’ atmosphere,\u201d said Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Campaign.<\/p>\n

As a practical matter, Trump’s announcement will target the Obama administration’s January decision to lock in strict gas mileage requirements for cars and light trucks, ending a review process before the Democrat left office.<\/p>\n

Back in 2012, the Obama administration set fuel-economy regulations for model years 2017-2025 and agreed to complete a midterm evaluation by 2018. But seven days before Obama left office, the EPA decided to keep the stringent requirements it had set in place for model years 2022 to 2025. The industry balked at the decision, insisting it was rushed through to beat the change in administrations.<\/p>\n

Trump said he’s putting that midterm review back on track, so officials can spend another year studying the issue before setting new standards in 2018.<\/p>\n

In Michigan, Trump delivered a campaign-style speech in which he railed against big trade agreements, specifically NAFTA and the recent Trans-Pacific Partnership, laying out in stark terms his view of how the pacts had hurt the U.S. auto industry and its workers.<\/p>\n

Trump said he had kept his promise to withdraw the U.S. from the TPP, an agreement that former President Barack Obama pursued with 11 other Pacific Rim nations. Trump also wants to renegotiate NAFTA, which includes Canada and Mexico, but he did not mention those plans in Wednesday’s remarks.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe assault on the American auto industry is over,\u201d he declared.<\/p>\n

While the administration has not said explicitly it wants to weaken the standards, a senior White House official said the Obama-era EPA had ignored reams of data cited by the automotive industry. The official spoke on condition of anonymity at a White House briefing in order to outline the action, despite the president’s criticism of the use of unnamed sources.<\/p>\n

The auto alliance last month urged Pruitt to relax the standards, saying they will drive up car costs, price customers out of the market and depress the industry. Obama’s EPA had argued the costs to consumers were mitigated by gas savings and that the rules would decrease greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.<\/p>\n

Trump told the auto executives that while he’s attuned to concerns about the environment, he doesn’t want to stifle jobs.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe want you to make great cars. And if it takes an extra thimble full of fuel, we don’t want that to stop making it,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

After the speech, Trump flew to Nashville, Tennessee, where he laid a wreath at Andrew Jackson’s tomb to mark the 250th anniversary of the former president’s birth, and toured the Hermitage, Jackson’s home. Trump has drawn comparisons between himself and Jackson, a fellow populist outsider.<\/p>\n

At a raucous rally with hundreds of supporters waving placards, Trump touched on everything from a federal court’s ruling Wednesday against his revised travel ban to the joint effort with House Republicans to replace the Obama-era health care law to how much he wants to cut taxes.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’re keeping our promises,\u201d said Trump, noting that he’s more than halfway through the 100-day measure by which new presidents are judged. \u201cAnd we have just gotten started. Wait till you see what’s coming, folks.\u201d<\/p>\n

On the flight back to Washington, he said he hoped to hold rallies \u201cevery two weeks. I mean, these are great people.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

YPSILANTI, Mich. \u2013President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that his administration will re-examine federal requirements governing the fuel efficiency of cars …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":94208,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,17],"tags":[503,14087],"class_list":["post-94207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-w","tag-barack-obama","tag-president-donald-trump","mauthors-jill-colvin","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94207\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/94208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}