{"id":9305,"date":"2014-05-08T11:06:22","date_gmt":"2014-05-08T03:06:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=9305"},"modified":"2014-05-08T15:55:25","modified_gmt":"2014-05-08T07:55:25","slug":"comparison-of-the-top-tech-company-acquisitions-microsoft-google-facebook-apple-and-other-business-giants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/05\/08\/comparison-of-the-top-tech-company-acquisitions-microsoft-google-facebook-apple-and-other-business-giants\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparison of the Top Tech Company Acquisitions: Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Apple and Other Business Giants"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 2005, Rupert Murdoch, a veteran business mogul with a solid reputation in creating empires out of companies was so sure of social media\u2019s future that he bought MySpace for a whopping $580 million. He couldn\u2019t be any more right\u2026 and wrong. Social media was (and is) the future, but the future belongs to Facebook, a college dorm startup founded just a year before the MySpace deal. Years later, Murdoch would sell MySpace for $35 million \u2013 merely 6% of its acquisition price.<\/p>\n

Such is the unpredictable nature of mergers & acquisitions, and that magnitude increases tenfold for technology companies whose hot products today can easily turn sour the next morning. In our latest infographic, we review the top technology mergers & acquisitions, their best bets and not-so good outcomes.<\/p>\n

In the report After the Acquisition by Ernst & Young, the consulting firm identified \u201cretaining key employees\u201d as one of six major areas that make a successful M&A. True to form, many of these technology M&As targeted talents to expand their business.<\/p>\n

When Google bought Android, Inc. for $50 million in 2005, it was after the top engineering talents like Andy Rubin, Andy McFadden, Richard Miner and Chris White. This team would successfully put Android at the leading mobile OS position today.<\/p>\n

Similarly, an ailing Apple in the nineties bought NeXT for $429 million (by far its biggest purchase), mainly to bring back Steve Jobs at the helm of Apple. Jobs, as we know, was booted out of the company he founded in a boardroom power struggle drama in 1985.<\/p>\n

But M&As are mostly about getting a bigger slice of the market. Facebook bought Instagram for $1 billion, an app the former can easily develop off its own photo sharing tool. But Facebook sees the bigger picture, to be precise, Instagram\u2019s 10 million new users in just a year. It\u2019s one of the top three fastest growing social networks today (the others are Pinterest and Tumblr). As for its recent purchase of WhatsApp\u2014$19 billion or 13 times Facebook\u2019s entire 2013 income\u2014the world awaits if it\u2019s a good or bad buy.<\/p>\n

An M&A can even be a losing revenue proposition as long as the acquiring company gets that big slice. Microsoft bought Skype in 2011 for $8.5 billion, never mind that Skype was not making profits. The software giant just needed a voIP to shove in the face of Google Voice and Apple\u2019s FaceTime. But was it a good buy?<\/p>\n

CHECK OUT THE INFOGRAPHIC FOR MORE DETAILS ON THE TOP TECH MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS:<\/p>\n

\"Business<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Republished from finances online<\/a> | Author: David Adelman<\/a> | Our Facebook<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 2005, Rupert Murdoch, a veteran business mogul with a solid reputation in creating empires out of companies was so …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":9311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,19,5],"tags":[3011],"class_list":["post-9305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-business","category-technology","tag-company-acquisitions","mauthors-david-adelman","mauthors-alex-hillsberg","mauthors-finances-online"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9305"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9305\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}