{"id":92743,"date":"2017-03-06T21:37:35","date_gmt":"2017-03-07T02:37:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=92743"},"modified":"2017-03-06T21:37:35","modified_gmt":"2017-03-07T02:37:35","slug":"halifax-taxi-driver-an-innocent-man-being-pilloried-in-public-his-lawyer-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/03\/06\/halifax-taxi-driver-an-innocent-man-being-pilloried-in-public-his-lawyer-says\/","title":{"rendered":"Halifax taxi driver &#8216;an innocent man&#8217; being pilloried in public, his lawyer says"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_92391\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-92391\" style=\"width: 358px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/taxi.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-92391\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/taxi.png\" alt=\"The defence lawyer for a Halifax cabbie who was acquitted of sexual assault in a decision that has drawn a storm of public criticism says his client is an innocent man who is being pilloried unfairly and racially stereotyped. (Photo: Jaakko Hakulinen\/Flickr)\" width=\"358\" height=\"356\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/taxi.png 358w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/taxi-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/taxi-300x298.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 358px) 100vw, 358px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-92391\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The defence lawyer for a Halifax cabbie who was acquitted of sexual assault in a decision that has drawn a storm of public criticism says his client is an innocent man who is being pilloried unfairly and racially stereotyped. (Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/jshakulinen\/4621097351\/\">Jaakko Hakulinen\/Flickr<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>HALIFAX \u2014 The defence lawyer for a Halifax cabbie who was acquitted of sexual assault in a decision that has drawn a storm of public criticism says his client is an innocent man who is being pilloried unfairly and racially stereotyped.<\/p>\n<p>Luke Craggs says in an emailed news release that 40-year-old Bassam Al-Rawi was found not guilty by Judge Gregory Lenehan for legitimate reasons, including a lack of forensic evidence of sexual activity.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMany persons have loudly vilified Mr. Al-Rawi. Those most eager to vilify Mr. Al-Rawi seem to be the least eager to gather accurate information,\u201d Craggs said in his release Monday evening.<\/p>\n<p>Craggs said that a large portion of public discussion has perpetrated the \u201cgrotesque stereotype\u201d that Al-Rawi&#8217;s Arab race and Muslim religion mean he is prone to sexually assault a vulnerable woman.<\/p>\n<p>Also Monday, the Nova Scotia Criminal Lawyers Association issued a statement saying criticism of Lenehan&#8217;s \u201cpartiality, competence, and his qualifications &#8230; is unfounded and undermines the discussion that is needed to address the prevention of sexual assault.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMost importantly, he is fair. He is the type of person that any reasonable, informed member of the public should want as a judge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Al-Rawi was charged after police found the woman, in her 20s, intoxicated, unconscious and partially naked in his car in the early hours of May 23, 2015.<\/p>\n<p>A police constable testified during the trial that she saw Al-Rawi shoving the woman&#8217;s pants and underwear between the front seats during the arrest. At the time of his arrest, Al-Rawi&#8217;s seat was partially reclined and the woman&#8217;s legs were resting on the back of the front bucket seat.<\/p>\n<p>Al-Rawi&#8217;s pants were undone at the waist and his zipper was down a couple of inches. Evidence of the woman&#8217;s DNA was found on Al-Rawi&#8217;s mouth, but the bodily substance couldn&#8217;t be identified.<\/p>\n<p>Lenehan said the evidence was concerning, and that the officer was correct to arrest Al-Rawi because \u201cany reasonable person\u201d could believe that Al-Rawi was engaging in or about to engage in sexual activity with a woman who is incapable of consenting.<\/p>\n<p>However, he said in his oral decision that the Crown provided no evidence on whether or not the woman consented to sexual activity.<\/p>\n<p>He said for Al-Rawi to be convicted the Crown had to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Al-Rawi not only touched the woman in a way that violated her sexually, but that it was done without her consent.<\/p>\n<p>Lenehan said a person is incapable of consent if they are unconscious or are so intoxicated that they are unable to understand or perceive their situation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis does not mean, however, that an intoxicated person cannot give consent to sexual activity,\u201d he said. \u201cClearly, a drunk can consent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That comment prompted condemnation of the judge by some citizens, a critical news release from sexual assault centres across the province, and anger from the woman at the centre of the trial.<\/p>\n<p>The woman told The Canadian Press in an email Monday that Craggs&#8217; defence of his client amounted essentially to a restatement of Al-Rawi&#8217;s defence at trial.<\/p>\n<p>The young woman didn&#8217;t attend court on the day of the decision, and said when she first read Lenehan&#8217;s remarks she was extremely angry.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt was impossible for me not to take it personally, and in general I wouldn&#8217;t want anyone in that position to be labelled a drunk or to be told that being drunk made them not credible,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Craggs said in his news release that trained sexual assault nurses carefully examined the woman and Al-Rawi&#8217;s DNA was not found on her. \u201cIn fact, this examination found no evidence of any sexual activity, consensual or otherwise,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe fleeting gratification of this uninformed public pillorying carries real world consequences for both Mr. Al-Rawi and informed public discourse,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>The woman in the case said she won&#8217;t be attending a protest planned for downtown Halifax on Tuesday, but is grateful it&#8217;s happening.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNow that everyone is showing their rage, that makes me feel better,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Crown spokeswoman Chris Hansen said if there is an appeal it will be based on legal errors in Lenehan&#8217;s decision, not the public outcry.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe don&#8217;t appeal a decision just because we don&#8217;t like it, we don&#8217;t appeal a decision because it&#8217;s not a popular decision in the public realm. It has to be based on an error in law.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HALIFAX \u2014 The defence lawyer for a Halifax cabbie who was acquitted of sexual assault in a decision that has &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":92391,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,18,16],"tags":[16228],"class_list":["post-92743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-halifax-cabbie","mauthors-michael-tutton","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92743"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92743\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92391"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}