{"id":92476,"date":"2017-03-04T21:45:35","date_gmt":"2017-03-05T02:45:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=92476"},"modified":"2017-03-04T21:45:35","modified_gmt":"2017-03-05T02:45:35","slug":"phl-wants-to-enhance-bilateral-talks-with-china-says-dfa-think-tank","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/03\/04\/phl-wants-to-enhance-bilateral-talks-with-china-says-dfa-think-tank\/","title":{"rendered":"PHL wants to enhance bilateral talks with China, says DFA think-tank"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"The<\/a>
The think- tank of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said Philippines and China are concentrated in enhancing bilateral talks to promote trade, investment and security.. (Photo: Department of Foreign Affairs Republic of the Philippines\/ Facebook)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA \u2013The think- tank of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said Philippines and China are concentrated in enhancing bilateral talks to promote trade, investment and security.<\/p>\n

This was cleared by Edgar Badajos, director for ASEAN Political Security of DFA during the of Seminar on ASEAN sponsored by the Presidential Communications Operations Officeat DFA Friday.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Philippines is more interested enhancing bilateral talks with China and not the issue of findings of Arbitral Tribunal,\u201d he said. \u201cWe need to strengthen first our relations with China and we will touch the issue in a proper forum.\u201d<\/p>\n

He explained that \u201cwe are not abandoning of our claims based on arbitral tribunal ruling\u201d but this is not the right time to talk on this issue.<\/p>\n

Badajos pointed out that we need to look for an avenue that will accelerate bilateral talks and not insinuate something that will trigger disputes.<\/p>\n

While Foreign Affairs Secretary Perfecto Yasay Jr. emerged strong with his remark that China should demilitarize in the disputed South China Sea, a senior official of a Washington-based think tank group said it\u2019s likely impossible for Beijing to dismantle its installed weapon systems in the area.<\/p>\n

Even experts on US-ASEAN Relations :Charting the next 40 Years,\u201d CSIS Southeast Asia program senior adviser Ernest Bower said \u201cChina is not going to walk that back just because they are asked to do it by a group of ASEAN foreign ministers.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a press conference Thursday\u2019, Bower said during the closing reception of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) international conference at the Manila Golf and Country Club in Makati City said, he did not believe the dismantling of military weapons system in the South China Sea would happen.<\/p>\n

He said free navigation on international waters of disputed islands was what they were after.<\/p>\n

Yasay earlier said some foreign ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) had expressed \u201cgrave concerns\u201d over China\u2019s militarization in the region.<\/p>\n

Bower said Yasay\u2019s response was correct, but it did not follow that China would readily comply.\u201cI think it\u2019s the right answer but I don\u2019t know, it doesn\u2019t seem very likely,\u201d he noted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA \u2013The think- tank of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said Philippines and China are concentrated in enhancing bilateral …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":91208,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[16151,420,343],"class_list":["post-92476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-bilateral-talk","tag-china","tag-philippines","mauthors-sammy-f-martin","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92476"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92476\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/91208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}