{"id":92274,"date":"2017-03-03T01:55:14","date_gmt":"2017-03-03T06:55:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=92274"},"modified":"2017-03-03T01:55:14","modified_gmt":"2017-03-03T06:55:14","slug":"trump-slump-signs-of-drop-in-international-tourism-to-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/03\/03\/trump-slump-signs-of-drop-in-international-tourism-to-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump slump? Signs of drop in international tourism to US"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Earlier<\/a>
Earlier this week, the tourism agency NYC & Company revised its 2017 forecast to predict a drop in inbound international travel to New York City, with 300,000 fewer visitors compared to 2016. (Pixabay<\/a> photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

NEW YORK\u2014The U.S. Travel Association on Thursday said the Trump administration’s immigration policies are hurting tourism.<\/p>\n

The non-profit industry organization said in a statement that there are \u201cmounting signs\u201d of \u201ca broad chilling effect on demand for international travel to the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n

White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters disputed the contention, saying: \u201cIt takes several months for each month’s international arrival statistics to be processed and released to the public. To claim the executive order has had an impact on travel would be premature.\u201d<\/p>\n

But the U.S. Travel Association’s statement added to a growing chorus of concern from the travel industry over the impact of Trump administration policies on tourism.<\/p>\n

Earlier this week, the tourism agency NYC & Company revised its 2017 forecast to predict a drop in inbound international travel to New York City, with 300,000 fewer visitors compared to 2016. It would be the first drop in visitation to New York since the start of the recession in 2008.<\/p>\n

The Philadelphia Convention and Visitors Bureau told the Philadelphia Inquirer this week that it had lost out on an international meeting with 3,000 attendees that decided to go to Canada or Mexico instead.<\/p>\n

And ForwardKeys, which tracks travel bookings, reported in February that international trends in bookings to the U.S. are down 6.5 per cent compared with the equivalent period the year before.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s known as the Trump Slump,\u201d travel guru Arthur Frommer wrote last month on Frommers.com. He called it \u201can unintended consequence of the Trump-led efforts to stop many Muslims from coming to the U.S.,\u201d resulting in \u201ca sharp drop in foreign tourism to our nation that imperils jobs and touristic income.\u201d<\/p>\n

U.S. Travel Association President and CEO Roger Dow said there’s concern that many international travellers have interpreted Trump’s policies as \u201cwanting to discourage international visitors generally, not just those who pose a security risk.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump’s initial ban on travellers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen was suspended following a court order, but a revised executive order on visas and immigration is expected soon.<\/p>\n

The U.S. Travel Association urged the administration to make clear in any revised order \u201cthat the U.S. welcomes and values legitimate international business and leisure travellers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tourism is an enormous sector of the U.S. economy, generating $2.1 trillion in economic output and supporting 15.1 million jobs, with international visitors a key component, according to data from the U.S. Travel Association.<\/p>\n

\u201cSecurity is a top priority for the U.S. travel community, but it’s critical to balance both sides of the ledger: make clear who is not welcome, but also who remains welcome,\u201d Dow said.<\/p>\n

A Jan. 30 op-ed piece in the Toronto Star newspaper encouraged Canadians to \u201cboycott vacations to the U.S.\u201d until Trump is no longer president.<\/p>\n

NYC & Company is launching a new campaign called \u201cNew York City \u2014 Welcoming the World\u201d to try to counteract the expected downturn. The agency said in a press release that the campaign is intended to reassure international travellers who may feel deterred about travelling to the U.S. that they are welcome in New York.<\/p>\n

But Alexandre de Juniac, head of the International Air Transport Association, said Thursday that industry leaders are not worried about a downturn, saying air travel to the U.S. \u201cstill looks positive in 2017.\u201d<\/p>\n

George Aguel, president and CEO of Visit Orlando on Disney’s Florida turf, also said \u201cit would be premature to determine if there is a potential decline in overall international visitation to our region, and if any such decline can specifically be attributed to the administration’s executive orders.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another factor in a potential downturn could be the strong U.S. dollar, which has made it more expensive for international visitors to vacation here.<\/p>\n

Last year, the U.S. Commerce Department predicted a record 78.6 million international visitors would come to the U.S. in 2017. That forecast is usually updated in May.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NEW YORK\u2014The U.S. Travel Association on Thursday said the Trump administration’s immigration policies are hurting tourism. The non-profit industry organization …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":92279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-travel","mauthors-beth-j-harpaz","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92274\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}