{"id":91117,"date":"2017-02-24T23:57:04","date_gmt":"2017-02-25T04:57:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=91117"},"modified":"2017-02-25T00:01:04","modified_gmt":"2017-02-25T05:01:04","slug":"white-house-bars-major-news-outlets-from-informal-briefing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/02\/24\/white-house-bars-major-news-outlets-from-informal-briefing\/","title":{"rendered":"White House bars major news outlets from informal briefing"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\"News<\/a>
News organizations including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN and Politico were blocked from joining an informal, on-the-record White House press briefing on Friday. (Photo: ERIC <\/a>SALARD\/Flickr)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

News organizations including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN and Politico were blocked from joining an informal, on-the-record White House press briefing on Friday.<\/p>\n

The Associated Press chose not to participate in the gaggle after White House press secretary Sean Spicer restricted the number of journalists present for the briefing. Typically, the daily briefing is televised and open to all news organizations credentialed to cover the White House.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe AP believes the public should have as much access to the president as possible,\u201d Lauren Easton, the AP’s director of media relations, said in a statement.<\/p>\n

On Friday, hours after President Donald Trump delivered a speech blasting the media, Spicer invited only a pool of news organizations that represents and shares reporting with the larger press corps. He also invited several other major news outlets, as well as smaller organizations, including the conservative website Breitbart News, whose former executive chairman, Steve Bannon, is Trump’s chief strategist. When additional news organizations that included The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN and Politico attempted to gain access, they weren’t allowed to enter.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The White House said it felt \u201ceveryone was represented\u201d by those in the pool and the invited organizations.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe decided to add a couple of additional people beyond the pool. Nothing more than that,\u201d said White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders.<\/p>\n

When asked by a reporter attending the gaggle whether he was playing favourites, Spicer said the White House had \u201cshown an abundance of accessibility,\u201d according to an audio recording of the gaggle later circulated by the pool.<\/p>\n

The pool was comprised of Reuters, Bloomberg, CBS, Hearst Newspapers and CBS Radio. Others in the gaggle were Fox, NBC and ABC. Bloomberg reported that its reporter was unaware of the exclusions until after the gaggle.<\/p>\n

In a statement, White House Correspondents’ Association President Jeff Mason said the group was \u201cprotesting strongly\u201d against how the gaggle was handled by the White House.<\/p>\n

When Spicer was asked by a reporter at the gaggle whether he was playing favourites, he said he \u201cdisagreed with the premise of the question,\u201d according to the audio.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’ve brought more reporters into this process. And the idea that every time that every single person can’t get their question answered or fit in a room that we’re excluding people. We’ve actually gone above and beyond with making ourselves, our team, and our briefing room more accessible than probably any prior administration. And so I think you can take that to the bank.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe do what we can to accommodate the press. I think we’ve gone above and beyond when it comes to accessibility, and openness and getting folks _ our officials, our team.\u201d<\/p>\n

Reaction from the barred outlets and others was swift.<\/p>\n

Davan Maharaj, editor in chief and publisher of the Los Angeles Times, called the newspaper’s exclusion \u201cunfortunate.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe public has a right to know, and that means being informed by a variety of news sources, not just those filtered by the White House press office in hopes of getting friendly coverage,\u201d Maharaj said in a statement. \u201cRegardless of access, the Times will continue to report on the Trump administration without fear or favour.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dean Baquet, executive editor of The New York Times, said that \u201cnothing like this has ever happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple administrations of different parties. We strongly protest the exclusion of The New York Times and the other news organizations. Free media access to a transparent government is obviously of crucial national interest.\u201d<\/p>\n

CNN’s Jake Tapper took aim at the White House as he kicked off \u201cThe Lead with Jake Tapper\u201d hours after the gaggle.<\/p>\n

\u201cA White House that has had some difficulty telling the truth and that has seemed to have trouble getting up to speed on the basic competent functioning of government, and a president who seems particularly averse to any criticism and has called the press the enemies of the American people\u2014they’re taking the next step in attempting to avoid checks and balances and accountability.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s not acceptable. In fact, it’s petulant, and indicative of a lack of basic understanding of how an adult White House functions,\u201d Tapper said.<\/p>\n

The Committee to Protect Journalists also condemned the move by the White House.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are concerned by the decision to bar reporters from a press secretary briefing,\u201d CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon said in a statement. \u201cThe U.S. should be promoting press freedom and access to information.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  News organizations including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN and Politico were blocked from joining an …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":91118,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,1145,16,17],"tags":[15407,15735,15736,13103,9746],"class_list":["post-91117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-headline","category-news","category-news-w","tag-cnn","tag-los-angeles-times","tag-lynn-elber","tag-new-york-times","tag-white-house","mauthors-lynn-elber","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91117\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/91118"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}