{"id":87023,"date":"2017-01-29T22:08:38","date_gmt":"2017-01-30T03:08:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=87023"},"modified":"2017-01-29T22:08:38","modified_gmt":"2017-01-30T03:08:38","slug":"white-house-immigration-order-small-price-for-safety","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/01\/29\/white-house-immigration-order-small-price-for-safety\/","title":{"rendered":"White House: Immigration order ‘small price’ for safety"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"The<\/a>
The changes, said White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, are \u201ca small price to pay\u201d to keep the nation safe. (Photo: Are T\u00e5gvold Flaten\/Flickr<\/a>\/AmerikanskPolitikk.no.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON\u2014The White House on Sunday tried to tamp down concerns about President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration order in the face of widespread protests, as some Republicans in Congress urged him to proceed with caution in the face of legal pushback. Top congressional Republicans, however, remain largely behind the new president.<\/p>\n

During a round of Sunday show interviews, Trump’s aides stressed that just a small portion of travellers had been affected by the order, which temporarily bars the citizens of seven majority Muslim nations from entering the country. The aides also reversed course and said that citizens of those countries who hold permanent U.S. residency \u201cgreen cards\u201d will not be barred from re-entering the U.S., as officials had previously said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI can’t imagine too many people out there watching this right now think it’s unreasonable to ask a few more questions from someone travelling in and out of Libya and Yemen before being let loose in the United States,\u201d said Trump’s chief of staff Reince Priebus. \u201cAnd that’s all this is.\u201d<\/p>\n

As of Sunday afternoon, one legal permanent resident had been denied entry to the country as a result of the order, according to a federal law enforcement official. The official was not permitted to discuss the order’s impact publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.<\/p>\n

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly issued a statement Sunday, saying he deemed the entry of lawful permanent residents to be in the national interest, and absent information indicating a serious threat to public safety and welfare, residency would be a \u201cdispositive factor in our case-by-case determination.\u201d<\/p>\n

The changes, said White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, are \u201ca small price to pay\u201d to keep the nation safe.<\/p>\n

But it’s unclear whether the order, which also suspends refugee admissions for 120 days and indefinitely bars the processing of refugees from Syria, will accomplish that. The order does not address homegrown extremists already in America, a primary concern of federal law enforcement officials. And the list of countries in Trump’s order doesn’t include Saudi Arabia, where most of the Sept. 11 hijackers were from.<\/p>\n

Priebus said that other countries could be added to the list. Trump spoke by phone Sunday with leaders from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, two countries not affected by the change.<\/p>\n

The order has sparked widespread protests and denunciations from Democrats and a handful of Republicans. Many have accused the administration of rushing to implement the changes, resulting in panic and confusion at the nation’s airports.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou have an extreme vetting proposal that didn’t get the vetting it should have had,\u201d said Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, who urged the new president to \u201cslow down\u201d and work with lawmakers on how best to tighten screening for foreigners who enter the United States.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn my view, we ought to all take a deep breath and come up with something that makes sense for our national security\u201d and reflects the fact that \u201cAmerica’s always been a welcoming home for refugees and immigrants,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Several Democrats in Congress said they would be introducing legislation to stop the ban.<\/p>\n

Trump, meanwhile, defended his actions, saying in a statement that America \u201cwill continue to show compassion to those fleeing oppression\u201d while protecting its own citizens.<\/p>\n

He said he has \u201ctremendous feeling\u201d for the people fleeing the bloody civil war in Syria and vowed to \u201cfind ways to help all those who are suffering.\u201d<\/p>\n

The White House said later that King Salman of Saudi Arabia and Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, had both agreed to support safe zones for refugees, but offered no further details.<\/p>\n

The comments came the morning after a federal judge in New York issued an emergency order temporarily barring the U.S. from deporting people from the seven majority Muslim nations subject to Trump’s 90-day travel ban. The judge said travellers who had been detained had a strong argument that their legal rights had been violated.<\/p>\n

The order barred U.S. border agents from removing anyone who arrived in the U.S. with a valid visa from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It also covered anyone with an approved refugee application.<\/p>\n

The Department of Homeland Security, however, said Sunday said the court ruling would not affect the overall implementation of the White House order.<\/p>\n

\u201cPresident Trump’s executive orders remain in place \u2014 prohibited travel will remain prohibited, and the U.S. government retains its right to revoke visas at any time if required for national security or public safety,\u201d the department said in a statement.<\/p>\n

Top congressional Republicans, meanwhile, were backing Trump despite concerns raised Sunday from a handful of GOP lawmakers.<\/p>\n

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he supports more stringent screening mechanisms, though he cautioned that Muslims are some of the country’s \u201cbest sources in the war against terror.\u201d<\/p>\n

Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, meanwhile, warned of unintended consequences, expressing fear the order could \u201cbecome a self-inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis executive order sends a signal, intended or not, that America does not want Muslims coming into our country. That is why we fear this executive order may do more to help terrorist recruitment than improve our security,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n

Koch political network, which is among the most influential players in the conservative movement, also condemned the plan Sunday.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe believe it is possible to keep Americans safe without excluding people who wish to come here to contribute and pursue a better life for their families,\u201d network co-chairman Brian Hooks said in a statement.<\/p>\n

Priebus was on NBC’s \u201cMeet the Press\u201d and Portman was on CNN’s \u201cState of the Union,\u201d while McConnell appeared on ABC’s \u201cThis Week.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON\u2014The White House on Sunday tried to tamp down concerns about President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration order in the face …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":87083,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,16,483,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-immigration","category-news","category-politics","category-news-w","mauthors-jill-colvin","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87023\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/87083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}