{"id":86683,"date":"2017-01-25T19:39:40","date_gmt":"2017-01-26T00:39:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=86683"},"modified":"2017-01-25T19:39:40","modified_gmt":"2017-01-26T00:39:40","slug":"alberta-crown-to-appeal-to-supreme-court-in-case-of-man-shooting-brother","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/01\/25\/alberta-crown-to-appeal-to-supreme-court-in-case-of-man-shooting-brother\/","title":{"rendered":"Alberta Crown to appeal to Supreme Court in case of man shooting brother"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>RED DEER, Alta. \u2013The case of a man whose conviction was overturned in the shooting of his brother is heading to Canada&#8217;s highest court.<\/p>\n<p>The prosecutor&#8217;s office in Red Deer, Alta., says the Crown is seeking leave from the Supreme Court to appeal a decision that set aside a murder conviction against John Wayne Mock.<\/p>\n<p>The Alberta Court of Appeal ruled last October that Mock was not criminally responsible in the death of his brother Timothy Mock.<\/p>\n<p>John Mock admitted from the start that he shot his brother three times in their home in February 2012.<\/p>\n<p>His defence was that he should not be held criminally responsible due to mental illness.<\/p>\n<p>A jury convicted him in 2013 of second-degree murder and he was sentenced to life in prison, but the Appeal Court determined Mock was \u201cactively ill.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RED DEER, Alta. \u2013The case of a man whose conviction was overturned in the shooting of his brother is heading &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":65579,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[14256,14257,1144],"class_list":["post-86683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-alberta-crown","tag-john-wayne-mock","tag-supreme-court","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86683\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/65579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}