{"id":85757,"date":"2017-01-18T19:52:43","date_gmt":"2017-01-19T00:52:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=85757"},"modified":"2017-01-18T19:57:57","modified_gmt":"2017-01-19T00:57:57","slug":"85757","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/01\/18\/85757\/","title":{"rendered":"Paul McCartney files lawsuit against Sony\/ATV over copyright"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_85759\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-85759\" style=\"width: 476px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/296245_10150381189323313_1059140_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-85759\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/296245_10150381189323313_1059140_n.jpg\" alt=\"Paul McCartney (Pictured) says he wants his music to get back to where it once belonged. (Photo: Paul McCartney\/ Facebook)\" width=\"476\" height=\"267\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/296245_10150381189323313_1059140_n.jpg 476w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/296245_10150381189323313_1059140_n-300x168.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-85759\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Paul McCartney (Pictured) says he wants his music to get back to where it once belonged. (Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PaulMcCartney\">Paul McCartney\/ Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NEW YORK \u2013Paul McCartney says he wants his music to get back to where it once belonged.<\/p>\n<p>McCartney filed a lawsuit in federal court in Manhattan on Wednesday against Sony\/ATV over copyright ownership of the many hit songs he wrote with John Lennon as part of The Beatles.<\/p>\n<p>The copyrights were famously bought by Michael Jackson in 1985 and then fully sold over to Sony\/ATV following his death. McCartney has long wanted the copyrights, and the filing says he has sent notice to Sony\/ATV saying that he will claim them back under a provision of U.S. copyright law that makes that possible after a certain time.<\/p>\n<p>The first song eligible to be claimed back is \u201cLove Me Do,\u201d in October 2018. The rest of the catalogue would follow in years after, ending in 2026.<\/p>\n<p>McCartney wants a ruling to say his claiming them doesn&#8217;t represent a legal breach of any contract or publishing agreement that Sony\/ATV could use against him.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDefendants have attempted to reserve their rights to challenge Paul McCartney&#8217;s exercise of his termination rights on contractual ground,\u201d the filing says.<\/p>\n<p>It adds, \u201cA judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time so that Paul McCartney can rely on quiet, unclouded title to his rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sony\/ATV said it had \u201cthe highest respect\u201d for McCartney.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have collaborated closely with both Sir Paul and the late John Lennon&#8217;s Estate for decades to protect, preserve and promote the catalogue&#8217;s long-term value,\u201d the company said, adding that it was \u201cdisappointed\u201d over the filing of the lawsuit which it said is \u201cboth unnecessary and premature.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK \u2013Paul McCartney says he wants his music to get back to where it once belonged. McCartney filed a &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":85759,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,106],"tags":[2534,3564,13874],"class_list":["post-85757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","category-hollywood","tag-lawsuit","tag-paul-mccartney","tag-sonyatv","mauthors-deepti-hajela","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85757"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85757\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/85759"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}