{"id":85281,"date":"2017-01-16T00:26:24","date_gmt":"2017-01-16T05:26:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=85281"},"modified":"2017-01-16T00:28:48","modified_gmt":"2017-01-16T05:28:48","slug":"no-basis-to-declare-martial-law-recto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2017\/01\/16\/no-basis-to-declare-martial-law-recto\/","title":{"rendered":"No basis to declare martial law \u2013Recto"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Amid<\/a>
Amid pronouncements of Pres. Rodrigo Duterte that no one could stop him from declaring martial law, Senate Minority Leader Ralph Recto on Monday said that there was \u201cno basis\u201d to do so (Pictured). (Photo: Sen. Ralph Recto\/ Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA \u2013Amid pronouncements of Pres. Rodrigo Duterte that no one could stop him from declaring martial law, Senate Minority Leader Ralph Recto on Monday said that there was \u201cno basis\u201d to do so.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is no basis to declare martial law. Rebellion has been tamed. No foreign army is steaming towards our shores to invade us,\u201d Recto said in a statement.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe problems we face today do not require the calling in of the army. We do not burn the house down to kill a few rats,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

He said that at present, the biggest problems the country needs to face are joblessness, hunger, poor social services, which he said could not be suppressed by the armed forces.<\/p>\n

Recto explained that there was no need to declare martial law because it would only show the international community how \u201cunstable\u201d the Philippines is.<\/p>\n

\u201cAt a time when we project stability to reel in tourists and investors, a martial law declaration will show the opposite, of how unstable we are,\u201d he further said.<\/p>\n

Pres. Duterte on Saturday said that no one — including the Supreme Court and Congress — could stop him from declaring martial law if that is the only way to \u201cpreserve\u201d the country.<\/p>\n

Recto, however, said that the President\u2019s assertion that the declaration of martial law is a unilateral act of the chief executive has \u201cno legal leg to stand on.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Constitution, which the President had sworn to uphold in his oath of office, empowers Congress to revoke it, to cite one of many safeguards,\u201d Recto said.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is also subject to Supreme Court review, and if to last more than 60 days, to congressional concurrence,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

The senator, meanwhile, said that the country should know by now that the President\u2019s pronouncement is only part of his \u201coratorical repertoire.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis thing about martial law should be filed under outlandish threats like riding a Jetski to the Spratlys, or feeding the fish of Manila Bay with bodies of salvage victims,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

Under the martial law regime in the Philippines, which was imposed by the late Pres. Ferdinand Marcos in Sept. 21, 1972, several human rights abuses including torture and killing were cited in various reports.<\/p>\n

The 1987 Constitution safeguards the institution from a repeat of martial law regime. Martial law is limited in duration and effects, even if contemplated by a president.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA \u2013Amid pronouncements of Pres. Rodrigo Duterte that no one could stop him from declaring martial law, Senate Minority Leader …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":85282,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,95,1],"tags":[3195,13640,13641],"class_list":["post-85281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ph","category-uncategorized","tag-martial-law","tag-pres-rodrigo-duterte","tag-senate-minority-leader-ralph-recto","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85281\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/85282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}