{"id":81267,"date":"2016-09-19T04:02:29","date_gmt":"2016-09-19T08:02:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=81267"},"modified":"2016-09-19T04:02:29","modified_gmt":"2016-09-19T08:02:29","slug":"vancouver-fashion-week-looks-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/09\/19\/vancouver-fashion-week-looks-future\/","title":{"rendered":"Vancouver Fashion Week looks to the future"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Photo:<\/a>
Photo: Vancouver Fashion Week\/Facebook<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

TORONTO\u2014Vancouver Fashion Week is generally regarded as a showcase for emerging talent to show their wares.<\/p>\n

And that’s what makes it a prime place for rookie artists to push the boundaries of how clothes are made, sold, and \u2014 most importantly \u2014 tailored to today’s discerning public, says festival founder and producer Jamal Abdourahman.<\/p>\n

He and other fashion folks mused on the various ways this digital era, increasing competition, and broader debates about cultural diversity are spurring industry experiments to suss out what, exactly, the discerning shopper wants.<\/p>\n

The weeklong Vancouver bash kicks off Monday. Here’s a look at some notable ways the rarefied fashion industry seems to be reaching out to the average woman:<\/p>\n

See now, buy now.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Perhaps the buzziest of the buzzy trends, expect to see some young Canuck designers at Vancouver Fashion Week experiment with this budding movement, says Abdourahman.<\/p>\n

Essentially the premise is exactly as it sounds \u2014 designs will be available for sale the moment the models step off the runway, not some five or six months down the line, as is traditional.<\/p>\n

Style icon Tom Ford emerged as a see-now-buy-now poster boy last week when he revealed his fall\/winter collection.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur sales have jumped tremendously at all of our stores and online,\u201d Ford said as proof the concept works, while attending the recent Toronto International Film Festival with his sophomore directorial effort \u201cNocturnal Animals.\u201d<\/p>\n

Burberry and Tommy Hilfiger have flirted with the concept, and a handful of designers bound for Vancouver are expected to drive the trend home even further, says Abdourahman.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’re pushing for that,\u201d says Abdourahman. \u201cIt works for young designers, it’s great news for young designers.\u201d<\/p>\n

And great for consumers, adds Ford.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhy would you want to see something and wait five months? It’s an antiquated idea,\u201d says Ford, noting social media and e-commerce have changed the rules.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou can go online and design your own Nike shoes and have them tomorrow. You can go on (the online luxury retailer) Net-A-Porter and buy something and if you live in New York or L.A., it’ll be delivered that afternoon. So long lead, what is that? It doesn’t make sense.\u201d<\/p>\n

A diverse runway<\/strong><\/p>\n

Toronto-based designer Lesley Hampton heads to Vancouver intent on staging a combined men’s\/women’s and plus-size show. She’s also looking into getting an amputee model.<\/p>\n

The idea of dividing lines by gender and body shape is another outdated notion to the 22-year-old, largely self-taught Toronto designer.<\/p>\n

\u201cI really enjoy having a diverse runway, just showing, I guess a good representation of society,\u201d says Hampton, currently in the final year of George Brown College’s fashion program, who is one of several designers with combined or unisex lines at the show.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnything beyond the industry standard size makes me really excited.\u201d<\/p>\n

Why show at all?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The hole left by Toronto Fashion Week would seem to open up an opportunity for Vancouver’s version to fill the gap.<\/p>\n

But given its tilt towards more independent, smaller designers, it was not a good fit for the 40-year-old Picadilly brand, which says it turned down an invitation in favour of holding a runway show at a buyers’ market in Dallas.<\/p>\n

The family-run company is betting that a smaller show in a more targeted venue will yield bigger sales than a big fashion week.<\/p>\n

\u201cAll the other labels that we know that were part of Toronto Fashion Week are doing their own (shows) offsite, you know \u2014 little runways or (events) in private estates,\u201d says president Neil Dombrovsky.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd they’re just doing video and getting some Instagram PR stuff out of that and trying to promote their line through their own avenues.\u201d<\/p>\n

Why rely on bloggers when the designers can reach out directly to the consumer, he says.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese days you’re looking to get immediate results, you’re looking to get immediate sales and with social media the way it is, you don’t need all these bloggers to be part of it,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd you don’t need to be part of these fashion weeks.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TORONTO\u2014Vancouver Fashion Week is generally regarded as a showcase for emerging talent to show their wares. And that’s what makes …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":81268,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[2306,12264,12263],"class_list":["post-81267","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-fashion-and-beauty","tag-fashion","tag-runway","tag-vancouver-fashion-week","mauthors-cassandra-szklarski","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81267","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81267"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81267\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/81268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}