{"id":81073,"date":"2016-09-14T20:36:41","date_gmt":"2016-09-15T00:36:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=81073"},"modified":"2016-09-14T20:36:41","modified_gmt":"2016-09-15T00:36:41","slug":"philippine-leader-rejects-joint-patrols-eyes-china-weapons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/09\/14\/philippine-leader-rejects-joint-patrols-eyes-china-weapons\/","title":{"rendered":"Philippine leader rejects joint patrols, eyes China weapons"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_78332\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78332\" style=\"width: 620px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ph5-07052016_RB8-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-78332\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ph5-07052016_RB8-1.jpg\" alt=\"Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte. (Photo: Rey Baniquet\/PPD)\" width=\"620\" height=\"444\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ph5-07052016_RB8-1.jpg 620w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ph5-07052016_RB8-1-300x215.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-78332\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte. (Photo: Rey Baniquet\/PPD)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA, Philippines\u2014Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said Tuesday he won&#8217;t allow government forces to conduct joint patrols of disputed waters near the South China Sea with foreign powers, apparently scrapping a deal his predecessor reached with the U.S. military earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>Duterte also said he was considering acquiring defence equipment from Russia and China. The Philippines has traditionally leaned on the U.S., its longtime treaty ally, and other Western allies for its security needs.<\/p>\n<p>The remarks were the latest from a Philippine president who has had an uneasy relationship with the U.S. but also has tried to mend relations with China strained over South China Sea disputes.<\/p>\n<p>Duterte said he wanted only Philippine territorial waters, up to 12 nautical miles offshore, to be patrolled by Filipino forces, but not other offshore areas that are contested. He added he opposes Filipino forces accompanying foreign powers like the U.S. and China in joint patrols which could entangle the Philippines in hostilities.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe do not go into a patrol or join any other army from now because I do not want trouble,\u201d Duterte said. \u201cI do not want to ride gung-ho style there with China or with America. I just want to patrol our territorial waters.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Like other security pronouncements, Duterte did not provide details, but his rejection for joint patrols apparently goes against such an arrangement announced in April by the U.S. and the Philippine defence chiefs.<\/p>\n<p>While visiting Manila, U.S. Defence Secretary Ash Carter disclosed for the first time in a news conference with then Philippine Defence Secretary Voltaire Gazmin that U.S. ships had carried out sea patrols with the Philippines in the South China Sea, a somewhat rare move.<\/p>\n<p>Carter insisted that the U.S. did not intend to be provocative and was \u201ctrying to tamp down tensions here.\u201d But Gazmin said he expected that U.S. forces, \u201cwith their presence here, will deter uncalled-for actions by the Chinese.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Duterte said he wanted U.S. military forces out of the southern Philippines and blamed America for inflaming local Muslim insurgencies, in his first public statement opposing the presence of American troops in a part of the country.<\/p>\n<p>Washington later said it had not received a formal request to remove U.S. military personnel. White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Duterte had a tendency to make \u201ccolorful comments\u201d and drew a comparison with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.<\/p>\n<p>In an apparent aim to prevent potential damage in relations, Philippine officials said Duterte wanted the Americans out of the south for fear of their safety.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe desires that our American counterparts should be eased from harm&#8217;s way,\u201d the Philippine military said, adding about 100 U.S. military personnel were in the south to provide counterterrorism advice support to Filipino forces.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe assure our people and allies that Philippine-U.S. defence relations remains rock solid,\u201d the military said in a statement. It added that joint combat training and other activities by U.S. and Filipino forces this year and beyond \u201cremain on track.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA, Philippines\u2014Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said Tuesday he won&#8217;t allow government forces to conduct joint patrols of disputed waters near &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":78332,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[420,5631,6054,12204,5236,343,1039,10176,3370],"class_list":["post-81073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-china","tag-disputed-waters","tag-duterte","tag-joint-patrols","tag-maritime-dispute","tag-philippines","tag-south-china-sea","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-west-philippine-sea","mauthors-jim-gomez","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81073"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81073\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}