{"id":80180,"date":"2016-08-24T04:12:06","date_gmt":"2016-08-24T08:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=80180"},"modified":"2025-01-09T06:28:07","modified_gmt":"2025-01-09T11:28:07","slug":"private-lives-exposed-wikileaks-spills-secrets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/08\/24\/private-lives-exposed-wikileaks-spills-secrets\/","title":{"rendered":"Private lives are exposed as WikiLeaks spills its secrets"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"(ShutterStock<\/a>
(ShutterStock image)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

CAIRO \u2013 WikiLeaks\u2019 giant data dumps have rattled the National Security Agency, the U.S. Democratic Party, and the Saudi foreign ministry. But its spectacular mass-disclosures have also included the personal information of hundreds of people \u2013 including sick children, rape victims and mental health patients, The Associated Press has found.<\/p>\n

In the past year alone, the radical transparency group has published medical files belonging to scores of ordinary citizens while many hundreds more have had sensitive family, financial or identity records posted to the web. In two particularly egregious cases, WikiLeaks named teenage rape victims. In a third case, the site published the name of a Saudi citizen arrested for being gay, an extraordinary move given that homosexuality can lead to social ostracism, a prison sentence or even death in the ultraconservative Muslim kingdom.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey published everything: my phone, address, name, details,\u201d said a Saudi man who told AP he was bewildered that WikiLeaks had revealed the details of a paternity dispute with a former partner. \u201cIf the family of my wife saw this… Publishing personal stuff like that could destroy people.\u201d<\/p>\n

WikiLeaks\u2019 mass publication of personal data is at odds with the site\u2019s claim to have championed privacy even as it laid bare the workings of international statecraft, drawing criticism from longtime allies.<\/p>\n

Attempts to reach WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for an interview over the past month have been unsuccessful and the ex-hacker did not reply to written questions. In a series of tweets following the publication of the AP’s story, WikiLeaks dismissed the privacy concerns as \u201crecycled news\u201d and said they were \u201cnot even worth a headline.\u201d<\/p>\n

Assange has been holed up for the past four years in Ecuador\u2019s embassy in London, where he sought refuge when Swedish prosecutors sought to question him over sexual assault allegations. He gave no indication Tuesday that the offending material would be taken down.<\/p>\n

WikiLeaks\u2019 purported mission is to bring censored or restricted material \u201cinvolving war, spying and corruption\u201d into the public eye, describing the trove amassed thus far as a \u201cgiant library of the world’s most persecuted documents.\u201d<\/p>\n

The library is growing quickly, with half a million files from the U.S. Democratic National Committee, Turkey\u2019s governing party and the Saudi Foreign Ministry added in the last year or so. But the library is also filling with rogue data, including computer viruses, spam, and a compendium of personal records.<\/p>\n

The Saudi diplomatic cables alone hold at least 124 medical files, according to a sample analyzed by AP. Some described patients with psychiatric conditions, seriously ill children or refugees.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis has nothing to do with politics or corruption,\u201d said Dr. Nayef al-Fayez, a consultant in the Jordanian capital of Amman who confirmed that a brain cancer patient of his was among those whose details were published to the web. Dr. Adnan Salhab, a retired practitioner in Jordan who also had a patient named in the files, expressed anger when shown the document.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is illegal what has happened,\u201d he said in a telephone interview. \u201cIt is illegal!\u201d<\/p>\n

The AP, which is withholding identifying details of most of those affected, reached 23 people \u2013 most in Saudi Arabia \u2013 whose personal information was exposed. Some were unaware their data had been published; WikiLeaks is censored in the country. Others shrugged at the news. Several were horrified.<\/p>\n

One, a partially disabled Saudi woman who\u2019d secretly gone into debt to support a sick relative, said she was devastated. She\u2019d kept her plight from members of her own family.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a disaster,\u201d she said in a phone call. \u201cWhat if my brothers, neighbors, people I know or even don\u2019t know have seen it? What is the use of publishing my story?\u201d<\/p>\n

Medical records are widely counted among a person\u2019s most private information. But the AP found that WikiLeaks also routinely publishes identity records, phone numbers and other information easily exploited by criminals.<\/p>\n

The DNC files published last month carried more than two dozen Social Security and credit card numbers, according to an AP analysis assisted by New Hampshire-based compliance firm DataGravity. Two of the people named in the files told AP they were targeted by identity thieves following the leak, including a retired U.S. diplomat who said he had to change his number after being bombarded by threatening messages.<\/p>\n

The number of people affected easily reaches into the hundreds. Paul Dietrich, a transparency activist, said a partial scan of the Saudi cables alone turned up more than 500 passport, identity, academic or employment files.<\/p>\n

The AP independently found three dozen records pertaining to family issues in the cables \u2013 including messages about marriages, divorces, missing children, elopements and custody battles. Many are very personal, like the marital certificates that reveal whether the bride was a virgin.<\/p>\n

buy cialis super force online https:\/\/azpsych.org\/general\/october\/html\/cialis-super-force.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n

Others deal with Saudis who are deeply in debt, including one man who says his wife stole his money.<\/p>\n

buy prevacid online https:\/\/azpsych.org\/general\/october\/html\/prevacid.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n

One divorce document details a male partner\u2019s infertility. Others identify the partners of women suffering from sexually transmitted diseases including HIV and Hepatitis C.<\/p>\n

Lisa Lynch, who teaches media and communications at Drew University and has followed WikiLeaks for years, said Assange may not have had the staff or the resources to properly vet what he published. Or maybe he felt that the urgency of his mission trumped privacy concerns.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor him the ends justify the means,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Initially conceived as a Wikipedia-style platform for leakers, WikiLeaks\u2019 initial plan was for a \u201cworldwide community of informed users\u201d to curate the material it released wholesale, according to the site\u2019s now defunct question-and-answer page. Prominent transparency advocate Steven Aftergood privately warned Assange a few days before the site\u2019s debut that the publish-everything approach was problematic.<\/p>\n

\u201cPublication of information is not always an act of freedom,\u201d Aftergood said in an email sent in late 2006. \u201cIt can also be an act of aggression or oppression.\u201d<\/p>\n

Those concerns were heightened after WikiLeaks published a series of documents leaked by U.S. Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, now known as Chelsea, in 2010. The publication provided explosive evidence of human rights abuses in Iraq and Pakistani cooperation with the Taliban in Afghanistan \u2013 among many other revelations \u2013 but it also led to allegations that civilians in war zones had been endangered.<\/p>\n

Assange insisted WikiLeaks had a system to keep ordinary people\u2019s information safe.<\/p>\n

buy vilitra online https:\/\/azpsych.org\/general\/october\/html\/vilitra.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have a harm minimization policy,\u201d the Australian told an audience in Oxford, England in July of 2010. \u201cThere are legitimate secrets. Your records with your doctor, that\u2019s a legitimate secret.\u201d<\/p>\n

Assange initially leaned on cooperating journalists, who flagged sensitive material to WikiLeaks which then held them back for closer scrutiny. But Assange was impatient with the process, describing it as time-consuming and expensive.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe can\u2019t sit on material like this for three years with one person to go through the whole lot, line-by-line, to redact,\u201d he told London’s Frontline Club the month after his talk in Oxford. \u201cWe have to take the best road that we can.\u201d<\/p>\n

Assange\u2019s attitude has hardened since. A brief experiment with automatic redactions was aborted. The journalist-led redactions were abandoned too after Assange\u2019s relationship with the London press corps turned toxic. By 2013 WikiLeaks had written off the redaction efforts as a wrong move.<\/p>\n

Withholding any data at all \u201clegitimizes the false propaganda of \u2018information is dangerous,\u2019\u201d the group argued on Twitter.<\/p>\n

But some private information genuinely is dangerous, courting serious consequences for the people involved.<\/p>\n

Three Saudi cables published by WikiLeaks identified domestic workers who\u2019d been tortured or sexually abused by their employers, giving the women\u2019s full names and passport numbers. One cable named a male teenager who was raped by a man while abroad; a second identified another male teenager who was so violently raped his legs were broken; a third outlined the details of a Saudi man detained for \u201csexual deviation\u201d \u2013 a derogatory term for homosexuality.<\/p>\n

Scott Long, an LGBT rights activist who has worked in the Middle East, said the names of rape victims were off-limits. And he worried that releasing the names of people persecuted for their sexuality only risked magnifying the harm caused by oppressive officials.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou\u2019re legitimizing their surveillance, not combating it,\u201d Long said.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

WikiLeaks was criticized last month after it released what it described as \u201cAKP emails,\u201d a reference to Turkey\u2019s governing Justice and Development Party, known by its Turkish acronym AKP. But dissidents\u2019 excitement turned to scorn when they realized the 300,000 documents were little more than a vast collection of junk mail and petitions.<\/p>\n

Vural Eroz, 66, was one of many people who\u2019d written to the AKP, complaining in 2013 that his car had been towed from his lawn by authorities in Istanbul. He was startled to find that WikiLeaks had published the message along with his personal number.<\/p>\n

\u201cI would like to know for what purpose they exposed me,\u201d he said in a phone interview.<\/p>\n

Prominent anti-censorship campaigner Yaman Akdeniz, who reviewed hundreds of messages like Eroz\u2019s, said there was nothing newsworthy in any of them.<\/p>\n

Eroz said he admired WikiLeaks for exposing wrongdoing but said, \u201cthey should try to protect innocent civilians. They should screen what they leak.\u201d<\/p>\n

Experts say WikiLeaks\u2019 apparent refusal to do the most minimal screening is putting even its own readers at risk.<\/p>\n

Vesselin Bontchev, a researcher at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences\u2019 National Laboratory of Computer Virology, said he was startled to find hundreds of pieces of malicious software in WikiLeaks\u2019 dumps \u2013 suggesting the site doesn\u2019t take basic steps to sanitize its publications.<\/p>\n

\u201cTheir understanding of journalism is finding an interesting document in a trash can and then dumping the can on your front door,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Even Assange\u2019s biggest backers are getting uncomfortable. Journalist Glenn Greenwald, one of the site\u2019s leading allies in the media world, has distanced himself from WikiLeaks over its publication strategy. National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, whose asylum in Russia WikiLeaks helped broker, recently suggested the site should take more care to curate its work.<\/p>\n

Others are disillusioned.<\/p>\n

Dietrich, the transparency activist, said he still supported WikiLeaks \u201cin principle\u201d but had been souring on Assange and his colleagues for a while.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the labels that they really don\u2019t like is being called \u2018anti-privacy activists,\u2019\u201d Dietrich said in a phone interview. \u201cBut if you want to live down that label, don\u2019t do stuff like this!\u201d<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Satter reported from Paris and London. Cinar Keper in Istanbul contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CAIRO \u2013 WikiLeaks\u2019 giant data dumps have rattled the National Security Agency, the U.S. Democratic Party, and the Saudi foreign …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":11262,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[12000],"class_list":["post-80180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-technology","tag-wikileaks","mauthors-raphael-satter","mauthors-maggie-machiel","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80180"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80180\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":281540,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80180\/revisions\/281540"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11262"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}