{"id":79049,"date":"2016-07-24T06:56:14","date_gmt":"2016-07-24T10:56:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=79049"},"modified":"2016-07-24T06:56:14","modified_gmt":"2016-07-24T10:56:14","slug":"no-asean-consensus-south-china-sea-row-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/07\/24\/no-asean-consensus-south-china-sea-row-now\/","title":{"rendered":"No ASEAN consensus on South China Sea row \u2013 for now"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_48021\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-48021\" style=\"width: 854px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/ASEANFlagWeb_537356f2a6628b40f578ed127ab352ca1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-48021\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/ASEANFlagWeb_537356f2a6628b40f578ed127ab352ca1.jpg\" alt=\"Flags of each country member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.  (Photo: ASEAN's website) \" width=\"854\" height=\"376\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/ASEANFlagWeb_537356f2a6628b40f578ed127ab352ca1.jpg 854w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/ASEANFlagWeb_537356f2a6628b40f578ed127ab352ca1-300x132.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/ASEANFlagWeb_537356f2a6628b40f578ed127ab352ca1-600x264.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 854px) 100vw, 854px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-48021\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Flags of each country member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.<br \/>(Photo: <a href=\"http:\/\/asean.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">ASEAN&#8217;s website<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>VIENTIANE, Laos \u2013 Southeast Asia\u2019s main grouping apparently failed to reach a consensus on how to deal with China&#8217;s territorial expansion in the South China Sea, intensifying a diplomatic stalemate that officials said they hope to resolve after closed-door parleys on Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>The foreign ministers of the 10 countries that make up the Association of Southeast Asian Nations deliberated for several hours, continuing the unfruitful discussions their senior officials had on Saturday, but with no result.<\/p>\n<p>A bland press statement issued at the end of the talks said only that the ministers had a \u201ccandid and constructive exchange of views on regional and international issues&#8230; as well as developments in the Middle East, Korean Peninsula and the South China Sea.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Thai Foreign Ministry spokesman Sek Wannamethee said they haven\u2019t completed their discussion yet. \u201cThey are now having a working luncheon followed by an ASEAN retreat, so the issue will be discussed during the retreat,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Like all other ASEAN meetings, the foreign ministers\u2019 conclave also traditionally ends with a joint communique. But the sticking point is whether to include a reference to the South China Sea. ASEAN\u2019s cardinal principle is decisions by consensus, which means any country can veto a proposal. This time, it is Cambodia, China\u2019s close ally. In 2012, Cambodia also blocked a reference to the dispute, which ended with the ministers failing to issue a statement for the first time in the bloc\u2019s history.<\/p>\n<p>Sek said the \u201cjoint communique is still being drafted.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sunday\u2019s talks are expected to deal with terrorism, the economy, climate change, security, the impact of Brexit and other issues. But all this has been overshadowed by the July 12 decision by a Hague-based tribunal in a dispute between China and the Philippines.<\/p>\n<p>The Permanent Court of Arbitration found that China had no basis for its expansive claims to territorial waters around the Philippines. China has similar claims against other ASEAN nations, including Vietnam and Malaysia, and the ruling should have emboldened ASEAN to challenge Beijing more forcibly.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s being prevented by Cambodia, said diplomats speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter with the media. They said the draft statement to be issued by the ministers on Tuesday left blank spaces under the heading \u201cSouth China Sea\u201d until a consensus can be reached.<\/p>\n<p>Laos, which also is a China ally, has trod carefully and not taken sides because of its position as the host.<\/p>\n<p>A diplomat who attended closed door meetings told The Associated Press: \u201cCambodia is the villain deja vu 2012. It\u2019s really a loyalist of the big country C,\u201d the diplomat said, referring to China.<\/p>\n<p>Another diplomat said that the United States also did not push China during Saturday\u2019s discussions, leaving ASEAN countries with little firepower. The U.S. was more keen on getting the region\u2019s support on chastising North Korea, and ignored the South China Sea during the discussions, said the diplomat.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. and Chinese officials were meeting ASEAN ministers as part of broader talks.<\/p>\n<p>Tran Viet Thai, deputy director of the Institute of Strategic Studies, a Vietnamese government think tank, described the arbitration tribunal\u2019s ruling as very important because, theoretically at least, it should help resolve disputes, uphold the law and clarify the stance of the parties. \u201cBut at this point, it is not a magic stick&#8230; it\u2019s not a solution to everything, but rather it needs to be combined with other measures,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The South China Sea is dotted with reefs and rocky outcroppings that several governments claim, including China and the Philippines. The arbitration panel didn\u2019t take a position on who owns the disputed territories. It did conclude that many of them are legally rocks, even if they\u2019ve been built into islands, and therefore do not include the international rights to develop the surrounding waters. That and other findings invalidated much of what China\u2019s called its historic claims to the resource-rich sea.<\/p>\n<p>In order to ease tensions, China, the Philippines and possibly other claimants must define what the ruling means for fishing, offshore oil and gas exploration, and military and other activities in the vast body of water that lies between the southern Chinese coast and the Philippine archipelago.<\/p>\n<p>China has rejected the ruling as bogus, and called for bilateral negotiations with the Philippines. In recent days, its military has staged live-firing exercises in the area and said it would begin regular aerial patrols over the sea. It also has asserted that it will not be deterred from continuing construction of its man-made islands.<\/p>\n<p>In a commentary Sunday, China\u2019s official Xinhua News Agency urged East Asian nations to be vigilant against U.S. \u201cinterference\u201d in the region and to foster closer ties with China, \u201ca market no country can afford to lose.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Philippines also remains in a tight spot despite the legal and moral victory it gained through the tribunal&#8217;s decision. It simply cannot afford to antagonize China, especially since its new president, Rodrigo Duterte, has made friendly overtures to Beijing to repair relations that were strained under his predecessor, Benigno Aquino III.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Associated Press writers Minh V. Tran in Hanoi, Vietnam, and Jim Gomez in Manila, Philippines, contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>VIENTIANE, Laos \u2013 Southeast Asia\u2019s main grouping apparently failed to reach a consensus on how to deal with China&#8217;s territorial &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":48021,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[595,420,1039],"class_list":["post-79049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","tag-asean","tag-china","tag-south-china-sea","mauthors-vijay-joshi","mauthors-daniel-malloy","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79049"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79049\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48021"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}