{"id":78120,"date":"2016-07-04T00:23:13","date_gmt":"2016-07-04T04:23:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=78120"},"modified":"2016-07-04T00:23:13","modified_gmt":"2016-07-04T04:23:13","slug":"tarzan-bfg-dwarfed-dory-stays-no-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/07\/04\/tarzan-bfg-dwarfed-dory-stays-no-1\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Tarzan,&#8217; &#8216;BFG&#8217; dwarfed by &#8216;Dory,&#8217; which stays no. 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_78121\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78121\" style=\"width: 706px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/13466464_904570162985626_636678657095346213_n.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-78121\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/13466464_904570162985626_636678657095346213_n.png\" alt=\"Photo: Finding Dory\/Facebook\" width=\"706\" height=\"704\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/13466464_904570162985626_636678657095346213_n.png 706w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/13466464_904570162985626_636678657095346213_n-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/13466464_904570162985626_636678657095346213_n-300x300.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 706px) 100vw, 706px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-78121\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/findingdory\" target=\"_blank\">Finding Dory\/Facebook<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NEW YORK\u2014It&#8217;s Dory&#8217;s ocean. The rest of the movies are just swimming in it.<\/p>\n<p>The Pixar sequel \u201cFinding Dory\u201d led the box office for the third straight weekend, dwarfing \u201cThe Legend of Tarzan\u201d and Steven Spielberg&#8217;s Roald Dahl adaption \u201cThe BFG,\u201d both big-budget debuts that had hoped to dominate the July 4th holiday.<\/p>\n<p>But modest enthusiasm for the high-profile new releases left the weekend to \u201cDory\u201d again, which came in No. 1 with $41.9 million, according to studio estimates Sunday. Disney expects the film to make about $50 million over the four-day holiday weekend. It&#8217;s grossed $538.2 million globally in three weeks.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTarzan\u201d came the closest to dethroning \u201cDory\u201d with $38.1 million. While that total was better than expected, it&#8217;s far from chest-thumping for a movie that cost Warner Bros. $180 million to make. Critics largely panned the David Yates-directed film, staring Alexander Skarsgard as the King of the Jungle and Margot Robbie as Jane. But audiences gave it a respectable A-minus CinemaScore.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe&#8217;re in a much better place today than we thought we were going to be,\u201d said Jeff Goldstein, head of distribution for Warner Bros. \u201cWe&#8217;re positively looking forward. Friday came in much stronger than we thought. Yesterday was much stronger than we thought.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The horror sequel \u201cThe Purge: Election Year\u201d opened solidly with $30.9 million, in line with previous \u201cPurge\u201d installments where crime in America is legal for 12 hours every year. Given that the Universal release, produced by Blumhouse Productions, cost a mere $10 million to make, it was the most lucrative opening of the week.<\/p>\n<p>The continued success of \u201cDory,\u201d however, bit into the similarly family-friendly \u201cThe BFG,\u201d which debuted weakly with $19.6 million. The Spielberg film, starring Mark Rylance as the titular giant, cost about $140 million to make. Reviews were largely good but not glowing. Despite a red-carpet premiere at the Cannes Film Festival, Spielberg&#8217;s first film for Disney didn&#8217;t click with audiences.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt&#8217;s frustrating when there&#8217;s a disconnect between the critical response, the consumer response and ultimately the box office,\u201d said Dave Hollis, distribution head for Disney. \u201cBut we&#8217;ve got every reason to be hopeful for the midweek business ahead, every reason to be hopeful for a nice long run. And we&#8217;ve only opened in two international markets: Australia and Russia.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The weekend&#8217;s tailor-made option, \u201cIndependence Day: Resurgence,\u201d had hoped to open big last week and play through the holiday weekend. Instead, the 20th Century Fox release bombed and dropped steeply in its second week, sliding 60 per cent to $16.5 million in fifth place.<\/p>\n<p>The diverse slate of releases didn&#8217;t produce a runaway hit, but overall business was up in theatres from recent July 4th weekends, partially since the holiday fell on a Monday this year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cConsidering the roller-coaster year we&#8217;ve been having, this was a solid Fourth of July,\u201d said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst for comScore. \u201cIn terms of the cumulative numbers, it was a really good showing, though individual films may have had their challenges.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK\u2014It&#8217;s Dory&#8217;s ocean. The rest of the movies are just swimming in it. The Pixar sequel \u201cFinding Dory\u201d led &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":78121,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,106],"tags":[11470,4069,3679,11468,798,11469],"class_list":["post-78120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","category-hollywood","tag-bfg","tag-box-office","tag-entertainment-2","tag-finding-dory","tag-movies","tag-tarzan","mauthors-jake-coyle","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78120\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}