{"id":77070,"date":"2016-06-08T22:04:48","date_gmt":"2016-06-09T02:04:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=77070"},"modified":"2016-06-08T22:04:48","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T02:04:48","slug":"judge-awards-8m-b-c-man-wrongfully-imprisoned-27-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/06\/08\/judge-awards-8m-b-c-man-wrongfully-imprisoned-27-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge awards $8M to B.C. man wrongfully imprisoned for 27 years"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_9724\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9724\" style=\"width: 500px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_92362714.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9724\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_92362714.jpg\" alt=\"ShutterStock\" width=\"500\" height=\"334\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_92362714.jpg 500w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_92362714-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9724\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">ShutterStock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>VANCOUVER\u2014A \u00a0man who was wrongfully convicted on sexual assault charges has been awarded more than $8 million by a B.C. court after spending nearly 27 years behind bars.<\/p>\n<p>In a 130-page ruling released Wednesday, Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson of the B.C. Supreme Court criticized the Crown&#8217;s decision to withhold key evidence that he said Ivan Henry was entitled to receive.<\/p>\n<p>The judge said it demonstrated a \u201cshocking disregard\u201d for Henry&#8217;s charter rights.<\/p>\n<p>Henry, 69, sued the City of Vancouver, the province and the federal government after being acquitted in 2010 of 10 sexual assault convictions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCrown counsel&#8217;s wrongful non-disclosure seriously infringed Mr. Henry&#8217;s right to a fair trial,\u201d Hinkson wrote in his decision.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf Mr. Henry had received the disclosure to which he was entitled, the likely result would have been his acquittal at his 1983 trial &#8230; and certainly the avoidance of his sentencing as dangerous offender.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The judge outlined a series of police notes, reports, lab information, interviews, witness statements and Vancouver police property and exhibits that wasn&#8217;t disclosed to Henry before or during his trial.<\/p>\n<p>The Crown also didn&#8217;t tell Henry or his lawyer that a police detective believed one of the victims had been assaulted by a different person, says the decision.<\/p>\n<p>The judge said material information and evidence was intentionally withheld and that the Crown knew or ought to have known that this would compromise Henry&#8217;s ability to defend himself.<\/p>\n<p>Crown lawyer John Hunter argued Henry&#8217;s decision to rebuff legal counsel meant he wouldn&#8217;t have known what to do with the additional evidence even if it had been provided to him, despite his repeated requests.<\/p>\n<p>Hinkson rejected Hunter&#8217;s argument that awarding Henry millions of dollars in compensation would send the wrong message by reinforcing the notion that a lucrative payday could await self-represented defendants if their cases go awry.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe fact that Mr. Henry was self-represented at trial heightened rather than diminished the responsibility of the Crown to provide him with the disclosure he had a right to receive in order to make full answer and defence,\u201d Hinkson said.<\/p>\n<p>Henry&#8217;s lawyer, John Laxton, argued that his client deserved as much as $43 million in compensation.<\/p>\n<p>Henry&#8217;s daughter, Tanya Olivares, declined comment on her and her father&#8217;s behalf. Henry suffered a heart attack in March and is recovering from heart bypass surgery he had eight weeks ago.<\/p>\n<p>Wednesday&#8217;s ruling orders the provincial government to pay Henry $530,000 for lost earnings, $56,700 in special damages and $7.5 million for \u201cvindication and deterrence\u201d when it came to Henry&#8217;s charter rights being violated.<\/p>\n<p>The award is in addition to undisclosed settlements reached last year with the City of Vancouver and the federal government.<\/p>\n<p>Hinkson also ruled that any contributory negligence over investigative failures made by Vancouver police is negated by the Crown neglecting to disclose much of its evidence.<\/p>\n<p>B.C. Attorney General Suzanne Anton said the Justice Ministry will review the decision in the weeks ahead.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is important to recognize that Canadian law on disclosure has undergone significant developments since Mr. Henry&#8217;s criminal trial,\u201d she said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe legal obligations for police and prosecutors in making disclosure to the defence are now much more robust and clearly defined.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>VANCOUVER\u2014A \u00a0man who was wrongfully convicted on sexual assault charges has been awarded more than $8 million by a B.C. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":9724,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[1110,11123,7951,572,11124],"class_list":["post-77070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-crime","tag-ivan-henry","tag-justice","tag-vancouver","tag-wrongfully-imprisoned","mauthors-geordon-omand","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77070"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77070\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}