{"id":74198,"date":"2016-04-14T22:42:33","date_gmt":"2016-04-15T02:42:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=74198"},"modified":"2016-04-15T01:41:18","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T05:41:18","slug":"china-blasts-new-us-philippine-military-co-operation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/04\/14\/china-blasts-new-us-philippine-military-co-operation\/","title":{"rendered":"China blasts new US Philippine military co operation"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"ShutterStock\"<\/a>
ShutterStock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

BEIJING\u2014Responding to what it says are provocative plans for stepped-up U.S.-Philippine military co-operation, China says it will \u201cresolutely defend\u201d its interests and accuses the two longstanding allies of militarizing the region and harbouring a \u201cCold War mentality.\u201d<\/p>\n

The ministry’s comments came shortly after Thursday’s announcement that the U.S. would send troops and planes to the Philippines for more frequent rotations and will increase joint sea and air patrols with Philippine forces in the South China Sea.<\/p>\n

In a move likely to further anger Beijing, U.S. Defence Secretary Ash Carter says he will be visiting an aircraft carrier\u2014a potent symbol of U.S. military might\u2014in the South China Sea during his current visit to the region, which does not include a stop in China.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe joint patrols between the United States and the Philippines in the South China Sea are militarizing the region and are non-beneficial to regional peace and stability,\u201d said a statement posted to the ministry’s website late Thursday.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Chinese military will pay close attention to the situation, and resolutely defend China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime interests,\u201d the statement said.<\/p>\n

China claims virtually the entire South China Sea as its territory and is building manmade islands there topped with airstrips and other infrastructure. The Philippines, Vietnam and others also claim territory controlled or claimed by China and increased military and coast guard deployments by all sides could increase the potential for conflict.<\/p>\n

The ministry’s statement also referenced China’s long-standing opposition to U.S. military alliances in the region. It regards those as a form of unwelcome interference that stymies its desired status as the pre-eminent military power in the Asia-Pacific.<\/p>\n

\u201cStrengthening the U.S.-Philippine military alliance … is a sign of a Cold War mentality that is unbeneficial to peace and stability in the South China Sea,\u201d the statement said.<\/p>\n

The South China Sea dispute also featured in talks between Chinese Premier Li Keqiang and Malcolm Turnbull, the prime minister of close U.S. ally Australia which is trying to balance security needs with its economy’s reliance on the Chinese market.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’ve always had good and constructive discussions but our position is that all claimants, all claimants, should settle disputes peacefully and in accordance with international law,\u201d Turnbull told reporters in Beijing on Friday, a day after his meeting with Li.<\/p>\n

Beijing and Washington have repeatedly traded accusations over who is responsible for raising tensions in the South China Sea, with the U.S. citing China’s island-building project and efforts to block other disputants from parts of the crucial waterway, through which passes more than $5 trillion in global trade passes each year.<\/p>\n

China says its island developments are mainly for civilian purposes and says U.S. naval activities\u2014especially the sailing of ships close to its newly built islands\u2014threatens China’s security.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe U.S. has been taking all kinds of actions to provoke China, forcing it to take counter-actions that will result in an escalation of the situation,\u201d Su Hao, an international relations expert at Beijing’s China Foreign Affairs University, told The Associated Press.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe joint patrols are part of the U.S. plan and now the plan is being implemented,\u201d Su said.<\/p>\n

Su said Beijing anticipates the U.S. will eventually launch joint patrols with other nations to further challenge China’s position in the South China Sea. Chinese media speculate that could involve Japan, China’s historical nemesis with which it is feuding over ownership of a string of uninhabited Japanese-controlled islands in the East China Sea.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe continuous escalation of the situation will offer the U.S. better excuses and more opportunities to strengthen its military presence in the South China Sea, so as to turn the South China Sea into a region of military confrontation,\u201d Su said.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BEIJING\u2014Responding to what it says are provocative plans for stepped-up U.S.-Philippine military co-operation, China says it will \u201cresolutely defend\u201d its …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":11464,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,1145,16,95],"tags":[2129,420,330,10191,343,1039,10163,10176,352],"class_list":["post-74198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-asia","tag-china","tag-military","tag-military-co-operation","tag-philippines","tag-south-china-sea","tag-south-east-asia","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-us","mauthors-christopher-bodeen","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74198\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}