{"id":69925,"date":"2016-02-01T05:43:35","date_gmt":"2016-02-01T10:43:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=69925"},"modified":"2016-02-01T05:43:35","modified_gmt":"2016-02-01T10:43:35","slug":"69925","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2016\/02\/01\/69925\/","title":{"rendered":"For the world’s most scrutinized body, Barbie has a new look"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Curvy<\/a>
Curvy Barbie
(Photo courtesy of Mattel<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

NEW YORK\u2014Poor Barbie. She had plastic surgery to become more socially acceptable. But a lot of her critics still don’t like her.<\/p>\n

Barbie’s manufacturer, Mattel, announced Thursday that the doll has three new body types\u2014curvy, tall and petite. Barbie will also now come in seven skin tones, 22 eye colours and 24 hairstyles. Mattel spokeswoman Michelle Chidoni said the product is evolving to \u201coffer more choices\u201d to make \u201cthe line more reflective of the world girls see around them.\u201d<\/p>\n

But Kris Macomber, who teaches sociology at Meredith College in Raleigh, North Carolina, says she’s \u201creluctant to celebrate Barbie’s new strategy because it doesn’t change the fact that Barbie dolls and other kinds of fashion dolls still over-emphasize female beauty. Sure, all body types should be valued. And, sure, all skin colours should be valued equally. But why must we keep sending girls the message that being beautiful is so important?\u201d<\/p>\n

Josh Golin, executive director of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, said Barbie’s changes are a testament to activists who for years have challenged her \u201cunrealistic and harmful body type.\u201d But body type \u201cwas only one of the criticisms,\u201d he said. \u201cThe other was the brand’s relentless focus on appearance and fashion.\u201d<\/p>\n

Kumea Shorter-Gooden, co-author of \u201cShifting: The Double Lives of Black Women in America,\u201d has said in the past that Barbie has a bigger impact on black girls struggling with messages about skin colour and hair. Shorter-Gooden applauded Mattel \u201cfor diversifying the size and look of Barbie,\u201d but noted that \u201cEuropean-American hair still prevails,\u201d and that the dolls’ outfits still \u201cconvey a traditional and constraining gender norm about how girls and women should look.\u201d<\/p>\n

Aside from whether Barbie’s looks will ever measure up to society’s changing expectations, another question worth asking is whether kids still want to play with Barbies. Barbie sales fell 14 per cent in the most recently reported quarter, with worldwide sales falling every year since 2012. A study by BAV Consulting found that consumers perceive the Barbie brand as being \u201cless relevant\u201d than 80 per cent of 3,500 brands in 200 categories BAV studied. BAV’s data analysis also found that consumers perceive Barbie as being in the bottom third of all brands when it comes to social responsibility but in the top 2 per cent when it comes to being traditional.<\/p>\n

Mattel said it will still sell the original 11.5-inch Barbie. The new versions will begin arriving on U.S. store shelves in March and will roll out globally after that. They are available for preorder at shop.mattel.com, and will ship in February.<\/p>\n

Quiana Agbai, an African-American mother of two who has written about \u201cthe effects of dolls not looking like my 5-year-old daughter\u201d on her blog, www.harlemlovebirds.com, said Barbie’s new look is \u201ca step in the right direction\u201d but noted that \u201cthere are brands already filling this need in greater detail.\u201d Agbai’s husband’s family is Nigerian, so she found a Nigerian princess doll for her daughter from a line called Queens of Africa. Agbai herself grew up playing with the American Girl doll Addy, whose story line involved escaping from slavery.<\/p>\n

Some, however, saluted the new Barbie wholeheartedly.<\/p>\n

Trina Finton, a Hispanic mom from Simi Valley, California, who works in tech and once bought herself an engineer Barbie from the doll’s career line, was \u201cthrilled\u201d to hear about Barbie’s new looks, especially the curly hair. In the past, when she’s taken her 3-year-old daughter to Target, \u201cI avoid the Barbie aisle. I just don’t want her to feel bad that she can’t see a doll that looks like her.\u201d<\/p>\n

Kelly Brownell was a Yale psychology professor when he concluded in a 1995 study that young girls notice the body shapes of icons such as Barbie and translate them into unhealthy images. Today, as a dean at Duke University, Brownell said the new Barbie \u201crepresents real progress, not only by having additional skin tones but by beginning to correct the wildly unrealistic body shapes and sizes of earlier days.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NEW YORK\u2014Poor Barbie. She had plastic surgery to become more socially acceptable. But a lot of her critics still don’t …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":69926,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,9095,3],"tags":[35],"class_list":["post-69925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-human-interest-lifestyle","category-lifestyle","tag-original","mauthors-beth-j-harpaz","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69925\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69926"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}