{"id":6606,"date":"2014-04-11T19:34:05","date_gmt":"2014-04-11T11:34:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=6606"},"modified":"2014-04-11T19:34:05","modified_gmt":"2014-04-11T11:34:05","slug":"rolling-stone-cover-flubs-constitution-tattoo-on-julia-louis-dreyfus-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/04\/11\/rolling-stone-cover-flubs-constitution-tattoo-on-julia-louis-dreyfus-back\/","title":{"rendered":"Rolling Stone cover flubs Constitution tattoo on Julia Louis Dreyfus&#8217; back"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_6746\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6746\" style=\"width: 306px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/20140407-juliacover-x600-1396890093.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-6746\" alt=\"Julia Louis-Dreyfus on the cover of Rolling Stone. (Photo: Mark Seliger \/ www.rollingstone.com)\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/20140407-juliacover-x600-1396890093.jpg\" width=\"306\" height=\"416\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/20140407-juliacover-x600-1396890093.jpg 306w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/20140407-juliacover-x600-1396890093-220x300.jpg 220w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 306px) 100vw, 306px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-6746\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Julia Louis-Dreyfus on the cover of Rolling Stone. (Photo: Mark Seliger \/ www.rollingstone.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr align=\"left\" width=\"90%\" \/>\n<p>LOS ANGELES &#8211; Julia Louis-Dreyfus better hope her latest tattoo is a temporary one.<\/p>\n<p>The cover image of next month&#8217;s Rolling Stone magazine featuring the &#8220;Veep&#8221; star depicts a nude Louis-Dreyfus with a tattoo of the U.S. Constitution signed by John Hancock across her back. The problem is Hancock signed the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>Louis-Dreyfus jokingly blamed the blunder on Mike McClintock, the fictional &#8220;Veep&#8221; character played by Matt Walsh who serves as communications director to Louis-Dreyfus&#8217; Vice-President Selina Meyer on the HBO comedy series.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yet another Mike (expletive)-up,&#8221; the 53-year-old actress posted Wednesday on Twitter. &#8220;Dummy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The National Constitution Center in Philadelphia mocked the flub by tweeting a photo of the cover alongside such Founding Fathers as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin in Signers&#8217; Hall with the words, &#8220;Thanks for the shoutout but no Hancock here.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Rolling Stone spokeswoman Melissa Bruno said the Declaration of the Independence is on the other side of Louis-Dreyfus&#8217; body, but they couldn&#8217;t fit in the signatures.<\/p>\n<p>Inside the magazine, another image shot by photographer Mark Seliger shows a man in a colonial wig tattooing Hancock&#8217;s signature above the &#8220;Seinfeld&#8221; actress&#8217; bare bottom.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m a perfectionist in my work,&#8221; Louis-Dreyfus notes in the magazine&#8217;s cover story. &#8220;I think I might drive people nuts. I don&#8217;t ask them, because I don&#8217;t need that (expletive) on top of how I&#8217;m feeling.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; LOS ANGELES &#8211; Julia Louis-Dreyfus better hope her latest tattoo is a temporary one. The cover image of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":6746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2013,2014,486,352],"class_list":["post-6606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-entertainment","tag-julia","tag-louis","tag-people","tag-us","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6606\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}