{"id":65064,"date":"2015-11-18T23:49:57","date_gmt":"2015-11-19T05:49:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=65064"},"modified":"2015-11-18T23:49:57","modified_gmt":"2015-11-19T05:49:57","slug":"us-court-facebooks-content-blocking-legal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/11\/18\/us-court-facebooks-content-blocking-legal\/","title":{"rendered":"US Court: Facebook&#8217;s content blocking legal"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_31515\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-31515\" style=\"width: 461px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/shutterstock_171252086.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-31515\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/shutterstock_171252086-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Gil C \/ Shutterstock.com\" width=\"461\" height=\"307\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/shutterstock_171252086-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/shutterstock_171252086-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/shutterstock_171252086-20x13.jpg 20w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/shutterstock_171252086.jpg 1000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 461px) 100vw, 461px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-31515\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Gil C \/ Shutterstock.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON &#8211; In a major victory for Facebook, a United States court has ruled that it can block content without any explanation after a Sikh group filed a lawsuit challenging the blocking of its social media page.<\/p>\n<p>The San Francisco court&#8217;s ruling came in response to the lawsuit filed against the Silicon Valley &#8211; headquartered company by Sikh for Justice, which alleged that its Facebook page, which advocated Sikh separatism, was blocked by the social media giant.<\/p>\n<p>US District Judge Lucy Koh, in her ruling on Friday, stated that the Sikh group&#8217;s claims of religious discrimination are precluded under the Communications Decency Act, which protects providers of &#8220;interactive computer services&#8221; by barring courts from treating service providers like Facebook as the publishers or speakers of speech created by others.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We will appeal and challenge the decision of Judge Koh which is just an extension of Facebook action of blocking SFJ&#8217;s page at the behest of the Indian government,&#8221; alleged attorney Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, legal adviser to SFJ.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Facebook is an American Corporation and owes allegiance to US Constitution which promotes and protects free speech content and not accede to threats of foreign governments but Judge Koh&#8217;s ruling failed to cover any of the allegations of SFJ,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If Facebook is a public company making billions of dollars in public money and they don&#8217;t want to give any explanation for why they blocked the content of a human rights group, then what is the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?&#8221; he asked.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement, Pannun said that Judge Koh should have at least ordered that the social media giant give SFJ an explanation as to who ordered the take down.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: small\">&#8220;Facebook owes an explanation to its users after or before blocking and removing the content which is guaranteed under freedom of speech,&#8221; he said.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON &#8211; In a major victory for Facebook, a United States court has ruled that it can block content without &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":31515,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[9230],"class_list":["post-65064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-technology","tag-uploads","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}