{"id":61969,"date":"2015-09-25T01:45:14","date_gmt":"2015-09-24T17:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=61969"},"modified":"2016-05-31T09:57:44","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T13:57:44","slug":"harper-enters-french-debate-without-political-allies-but-bloc-backing-on-niqab","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/09\/25\/harper-enters-french-debate-without-political-allies-but-bloc-backing-on-niqab\/","title":{"rendered":"Harper enters French debate without political allies but Bloc backing on niqab"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Canadian<\/a>
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (Facebook photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

OTTAWA \u2013 Stephen Harper doesn\u2019t have a reputation as a gambler, but his 2015 federal election call is shaping up as an all-or-nothing bet on another Conservative majority.<\/p>\n

The prime minister heads into tonight\u2019s nationally televised, French-language leaders\u2019 debate with only Gilles Duceppe of the Bloc Quebecois as a potential supportive dance partner after the votes are counted on Oct. 19.<\/p>\n

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair and Green party Leader Elizabeth May both slammed the door this week on any prospect of propping up a Conservative minority government, joining Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau in their flat out disdain for keeping Harper in office if his party can\u2019t command majority support in the House of Commons.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere isn\u2019t a snowball\u2019s chance in hell,\u201d Mulcair said Wednesday on the campaign trail.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe would not ever collaborate or support Stephen Harper,\u201d May told The Canadian Press in an editorial board the same day. \u201cIt\u2019s critical that he be gone before the Paris negotiations (this December on climate change) for the health of those negotiations.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are no circumstances in which I would support Stephen Harper to continue being prime minister of this country,\u201d Trudeau averred a day earlier.<\/p>\n

Harper won a majority government \u2013 his first \u2013 in the 2011 general election on the strength of a pitch that explicitly called for a majority mandate. He\u2019s avoided such talk during eight long weeks of campaigning this time around as most polls have had the three major parties deadlocked in a three-way tie.<\/p>\n

Asked about the absence of his majority pitch earlier this month during a campaign stop in Whitehorse, Harper warned voters of \u201csome kind of unworkable coalition that ends up with an agenda nobody actually voted for.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cSo I don\u2019t know whether that\u2019s a choice, but I know the only choice to keep us moving forward is a strong, stable, national majority Conservative government and that\u2019s what\u2019s I continue to advocate,\u201d he said at the time.<\/p>\n

There were early signs Thursday that the logjam could be starting to break, with three different pollsters suggesting New Democrat support may be beginning to soften, to the benefit of both Conservatives and Liberals.<\/p>\n

\u201cOverall, it\u2019s fragile,\u201d pollster Jean-Marc Leger said of NDP support. \u201cIt\u2019s really fragile in Quebec.\u201d<\/p>\n

That makes tonight\u2019s French debate in Montreal a critical milestone for Mulcair. It also makes him a target.<\/p>\n

When Parliament was dissolved for the election, the NDP held 54 of Quebec\u2019s 75 seats, with no other party in double digits. The Liberals held seven seats, five ridings were represented by Independents and five by Conservatives with a splintered Bloc Quebecois and Forces et Democratie splitting the remainder.<\/p>\n

Under new riding redistributions this election, the House of Commons increases to 338 seats from 308, including three new electoral districts in Quebec which will give the province 78 MPs.<\/p>\n

The debate is the third leaders\u2019 debate of the campaign but the first to be nationally televised by the major networks. It is also the first to include five party leaders, adding May of the Greens and the Bloc\u2019s Duceppe to the mix.<\/p>\n

It also marks the beginning of an intense nine-day period that will see three leaders\u2019 debates in all, two in French and one predominantly in English.<\/p>\n

The wild card tonight is the emotionally charged issue of religious face coverings and citizenship ceremonies.<\/p>\n

Harper and Duceppe will find themselves on one side of the issue, facing off against Mulcair, Trudeau and May.<\/p>\n

Both the Conservatives and the Bloc have put out campaign ads exploiting the divisive niqab debate, although the issue only touches a miniscule fraction of Canada\u2019s one million Muslims, who in total comprise just 3.2 per cent of the population according to the 2011 census.<\/p>\n

May had harsh words for both Harper and Duceppe this week when asked about the niqab debate.<\/p>\n

\u201cExcuse me, this is not an issue,\u201d she said. \u201cThis is a cynical manipulation.\u201d<\/p>\n

The leaders kept a low profile in the hours before the debate, though Trudeau held a photo-op with his wife and their three children playing in a park.<\/p>\n

The Conservatives, meanwhile, announced they would buy the Neustadt, Ont., house where former Tory prime minister John Diefenbaker was born and establish it as a National Historic Site.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OTTAWA \u2013 Stephen Harper doesn\u2019t have a reputation as a gambler, but his 2015 federal election call is shaping up …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":59720,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[35],"class_list":["post-61969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-original","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61969\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}