{"id":59852,"date":"2015-08-25T16:31:19","date_gmt":"2015-08-25T08:31:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=59852"},"modified":"2025-01-18T16:32:50","modified_gmt":"2025-01-18T21:32:50","slug":"enrile-denies-leaving-gigi-reyes-liable-for-his-plunder-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/08\/25\/enrile-denies-leaving-gigi-reyes-liable-for-his-plunder-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Enrile denies leaving Gigi Reyes liable for his plunder case"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_24543\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-24543\" style=\"width: 604px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Juan-Ponce-Enrile-3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-24543\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Juan-Ponce-Enrile-3.jpg\" alt=\"Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile (Facebook photo)\" width=\"604\" height=\"404\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Juan-Ponce-Enrile-3.jpg 604w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Juan-Ponce-Enrile-3-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 604px) 100vw, 604px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-24543\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JuanPonceEnrile\" target=\"_blank\">Facebook photo<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA \u2013 Senator Juan Ponce Enrile clarified that his temporary release from detention did not make his former chief of staff Jessica \u201cGigi\u201d Reyes principally liable for his alleged P172-million kickbacks from multi-billion pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.<\/p>\n<p>Enrile returned to the Senate yesterday after being granted a P1.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy cephalexin online <a href=\"https:\/\/revleonidastheoptometrist.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/cephalexin.html\">https:\/\/revleonidastheoptometrist.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/cephalexin.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p>45-million bail by the Supreme Court. With this, pork barrel scam whistle-blowers\u2019 former lawyer Levito Baligod feared that Reyes could be held responsible for the senator\u2019s purported misuse of his Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) allocations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBaligod is a discredited lawyer who was dropped by the \u2018star whistleblower\u2019 Benhur Luy himself,\u201d Enrile said in a Manila Bulletin report.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy levitra super force online <a href=\"https:\/\/revleonidastheoptometrist.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/levitra-super-force.html\">https:\/\/revleonidastheoptometrist.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/levitra-super-force.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow can the Supreme Court decision on my bail leave Atty. Gigi Reyes \u2018holding the bag\u2019 when the same Supreme Court ruled in favor of our motion for Bill of Particulars?<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy toradol online <a href=\"https:\/\/revleonidastheoptometrist.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/toradol.html\">https:\/\/revleonidastheoptometrist.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/toradol.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p>\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Baligod also earlier stated that Reyes could be presumed as the ultimate recipient of Enrile\u2019s alleged P172-million commissions if she remained silent amidst the senator\u2019s legal tactics.<\/p>\n<p>Enrile only shunned Baligod\u2019s statements.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAtty. Reyes and I are accused as co-conspirators under the same complaint\u2026 The action of the Supreme Court regarding the Bill of Particulars must benefit Atty. Reyes as well,\u201d he asserted.<\/p>\n<p>Backstory:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/08\/24\/gigi-reyes-may-be-held-principally-liable-in-enriles-plunder-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Gigi Reyes may be held principally liable in Enrile\u2019s plunder case<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago also suspected that Reyes would be the \u2018fall out guy\u2019 of Enrile. She then urged the former aide to turn as a witness instead.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c[Enrile is] trying to make Gigi Reyes a standalone culprit for all the kickbacks that he received under the pork barrel schedules\u201d Santiago earlier said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cApparently, the Enrile camp is engaged in a lurid scheme that is masterminded by a person I can only call a sexually dysfunctional old man, a pedophile, kasi ang hilig nya si Gigi Reyes is not his age e (because his preference, Gigi Reyes, is not his age),\u201d she added, mentioning that Enrile allegedly had an affair with Reyes.<\/p>\n<p>Santiago not only slammed Enrile\u2019s underhanded tactics but also his illicit affair.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo take the criminal blame not only for his plunder, but also for his moral turpitude in the sense of sexual addiction openly displayed as a public official,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA \u2013 Senator Juan Ponce Enrile clarified that his temporary release from detention did not make his former chief of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":24543,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,1145,16,95],"tags":[249],"class_list":["post-59852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-rewrite","mauthors-cyra-moraleda","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59852"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59852\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285493,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59852\/revisions\/285493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}