{"id":58826,"date":"2015-08-12T16:33:54","date_gmt":"2015-08-12T08:33:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=58826"},"modified":"2025-01-20T17:52:27","modified_gmt":"2025-01-20T22:52:27","slug":"palace-says-no-pork-barrel-in-2016-budget-others-disagree","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/08\/12\/palace-says-no-pork-barrel-in-2016-budget-others-disagree\/","title":{"rendered":"Palace says no \u2018pork barrel\u2019 in 2016 budget, others disagree"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_57159\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-57159\" style=\"width: 851px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/11026193_1033750379986568_3546440379371811516_n.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-57159\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/11026193_1033750379986568_3546440379371811516_n.png\" alt=\"The Malaca\u00f1ang Palace (Facebook photo)\" width=\"851\" height=\"315\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/11026193_1033750379986568_3546440379371811516_n.png 851w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/11026193_1033750379986568_3546440379371811516_n-300x111.png 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/11026193_1033750379986568_3546440379371811516_n-600x222.png 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 851px) 100vw, 851px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-57159\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Malaca\u00f1ang Palace (Facebook photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA \u2013 The Malaca\u00f1ang Palace asserted that there was no multi-billion \u2018pork barrel\u2019 in the proposed 2016 national budget, which several lawyers and lawmakers suspected may be used as funds for next year\u2019s national elections.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Supreme Court decision on the PDAF (Priority Development Assistance Fund) is guidance for all in government,\u201d Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda said in a Philippine Star report.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy biltricide online <a href=\"https:\/\/care.aanviihearing.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/biltricide.html\">https:\/\/care.aanviihearing.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/biltricide.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Aquino administration is firmly committed to open, transparent and accountable governance, especially in terms of judicious allocation and proper disbursement of public funds,\u201d Presidential Communications Operations Office secretary Herminio Coloma Jr.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy kamagra oral jelly online <a href=\"https:\/\/care.aanviihearing.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/kamagra-oral-jelly.html\">https:\/\/care.aanviihearing.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/kamagra-oral-jelly.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p> also said in the same report.<\/p>\n<p>It can be recalled that the High Court earlier ruled the PDAF was unconstitutional. Prior the resolution, lawmakers had their own allotment of the PDAF which were supposed to be intended for programs and projects aimed at alleviating poverty in the Philippines.<\/p>\n<p>Several senators, however, allegedly abused their share of the PDAF and funded pork barrel mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles\u2019 bogus foundations and nongovernment organizations\u2019 ghost projects in exchange for commissions.<\/p>\n<p>With the 2016 national budget, former senator and possible presidential candidate Panfilo \u201cPing\u201d Lacson believed that there were still \u2018congressional insertions\u2019 of about P500 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Several lawmakers confirmed Lacson\u2019s suspicion as they pointed out the \u2018lump sum special purpose funds\u2019 allotted to government agencies.<\/p>\n<p>Bayan Muna Representative Neri Colmenares claimed that there were about P145 billion pork barrel funds in the national budget which may again be abused.<\/p>\n<p>Navotas Representative Toby Tiangco, on the other hand, claimed that there were at least P580 billion insertions in the budget which may be used by the ruling Liberal Party (LP) as their funds for the coming general elections.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy clomiphene online <a href=\"https:\/\/care.aanviihearing.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/clomiphene.html\">https:\/\/care.aanviihearing.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/clomiphene.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Budget Secretary Florencio \u201cButch\u201d Abad, for his part, reiterated that there were no lump sums in the proposed 2016 national budget.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s the problem when you shoot from the mouth, you expose your ignorance. But that\u2019s Tiangco \u2013 predictably preposterous,\u201d Abad said.<\/p>\n<p>With Lacson, however, Abad urged the former senator to meet with them so they could clarify his issues regarding the 2016 national budget.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe also urge Mr. Lacson to reach out to the DBM (Department of Budget and Management) if he has any misgivings about the budget, so we can prevent the misinterpretation of the budget data,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA \u2013 The Malaca\u00f1ang Palace asserted that there was no multi-billion \u2018pork barrel\u2019 in the proposed 2016 national budget, which &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":57159,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[249],"class_list":["post-58826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","tag-rewrite","mauthors-cyra-moraleda","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58826"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58826\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":286269,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58826\/revisions\/286269"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}