{"id":58338,"date":"2015-08-07T10:52:03","date_gmt":"2015-08-07T02:52:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=58338"},"modified":"2025-01-18T21:52:43","modified_gmt":"2025-01-19T02:52:43","slug":"we-cant-afford-another-four-years-of-you-mulcair-to-harper-as-leaders-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/08\/07\/we-cant-afford-another-four-years-of-you-mulcair-to-harper-as-leaders-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018We can\u2019t afford another four years of you\u2019: Mulcair to Harper as leaders debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_23086\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-23086\" style=\"width: 764px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/764px-Thomas_Mulcair_Montreal_NDP_Debate.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-23086\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/764px-Thomas_Mulcair_Montreal_NDP_Debate.jpg\" alt=\"Tom Mulcair. (Photo from Flickr\/Jonathan Allard)\" width=\"764\" height=\"768\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/764px-Thomas_Mulcair_Montreal_NDP_Debate.jpg 764w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/764px-Thomas_Mulcair_Montreal_NDP_Debate-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/764px-Thomas_Mulcair_Montreal_NDP_Debate-298x300.jpg 298w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 764px) 100vw, 764px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-23086\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Tom Mulcair (Photo from Flickr\/Jonathan Allard)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA \u2013 Stephen Harper\u2019s record on the economy and the environment faced an all-out assault from three different fronts, but the long-dormant issue of Quebec separatism generated a heated exchange in the second half of Thursday&#8217;s televised leaders&#8217; debate.<\/p>\n<p>NDP Leader Tom Mulcair, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau and the Green party\u2019s Elizabeth May set their sights on multiple aspects of the Conservative government&#8217;s program of tax cuts and balanced budget pledges.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy zoloft online <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pearsonchiropractic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/zoloft.html\">https:\/\/www.pearsonchiropractic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/zoloft.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Harper was repeatedly forced on to the defensive, \u201cclarifying\u201d economic statistics flung at him by his opponents.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy zydena online <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pearsonchiropractic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/zydena.html\">https:\/\/www.pearsonchiropractic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/zydena.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>But, he later stood back as Trudeau, running in third place in public opinion polls, turned his sights on Mulcair with attacks over the NDP leader&#8217;s pledge for special status for Quebec.<\/p>\n<p>Mulcair said in June that his party supports the so-called Sherbrooke Declaration of 2005, which endorses the principle of recognizing a referendum victory by the sovereigntist Yes side even by a majority of just 50 per cent plus one.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn doing so, he is actually disagreeing with the Supreme Court judgment that says one vote is not enough to break up the country,\u201d said Trudeau, who was taunted by Mulcair to provide a percentage he would find acceptable.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy diflucan online <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pearsonchiropractic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/diflucan.html\">https:\/\/www.pearsonchiropractic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/diflucan.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou want a number, Mr. Mulcair? I\u2019ll give you a number. My number is nine,\u201d Trudeau retorted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNine Supreme Court justices said one vote is not enough to break up this country. Yet that is Mr. Mulcair\u2019s position. He wants to be prime minister of this country and he\u2019s choosing to side with the separatist movement in Quebec and not with the Supreme Court of Canada.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Harper piled on and accused Mulcair of placating separatists.<\/p>\n<p>The exchange took some of the heat off the Conservative leader, who endured a series of sustained attacks throughout the debate\u2019s first hour.<\/p>\n<p>Harper blamed low oil prices for the slumping economy, but both Mulcair and Trudeau argued the malaise runs deeper and blamed Harper\u2019s policies \u2013 particularly the Conservative plan to allow income-splitting for families with children under 18.<\/p>\n<p>The NDP leader reminded Harper that in the 2008 election, he denied the country had slid into recession when in fact it was on the verge of the economic crisis and run eight deficits.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe\u2019s added $150 billion to Canada\u2019s debt in the last 10 years,\u201d Mulcair said, also noting a flurry of government spending announcements just prior to the election call. \u201cHonestly, Mr. Harper, we cannot afford another four years of you.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trudeau and May went after the Conservative leader on the government\u2019s gutting of environment regulations \u2013 something Harper described as \u201cstreamlining.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Maclean\u2019s magazine was moderated by political editor Paul Wells, and could very well turn out to be the only English-language debate of the campaign involving all four leaders.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA \u2013 Stephen Harper\u2019s record on the economy and the environment faced an all-out assault from three different fronts, but &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":23086,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[35],"class_list":["post-58338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","tag-original","mauthors-the-canadian-press1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58338"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285594,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58338\/revisions\/285594"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23086"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}