{"id":56706,"date":"2015-07-23T15:50:59","date_gmt":"2015-07-23T07:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=56706"},"modified":"2015-07-23T15:50:59","modified_gmt":"2015-07-23T07:50:59","slug":"number-of-canadian-babies-getting-hiv-from-moms-now-almost-zero-conference-told","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/07\/23\/number-of-canadian-babies-getting-hiv-from-moms-now-almost-zero-conference-told\/","title":{"rendered":"Number of Canadian babies getting HIV from moms now almost zero, conference told"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"(Shutterstock<\/a>
(Shutterstock image)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

TORONTO \u2013 Canada has virtually eliminated the incidence of mothers passing HIV to their infants at birth, primarily because of high rates of pre-natal testing and ready access to drug treatment that subdues the infection, researchers say.<\/p>\n

In 2014, there was only one case of mother-to-child HIV transmission in Canada, continuing a decade-long downward trend, said Dr. Jason Brophy, chair of the Canadian Pediatric and Perinatal AIDS Research Group (CPARG), which has been tracking cases since 1990.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe World Health Organization definition of elimination is less than two per cent transmission, and that\u2019s where we are right now,\u201d said Brophy, an infectious disease specialist at the Children\u2019s Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa.<\/p>\n

The finding was among data from three studies by CPARG\u2019s perinatal HIV surveillance program presented Wednesday at the 8th International AIDS Society conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention in Vancouver.<\/p>\n

Each year, an average of about 200 babies are born in Canada to women diagnosed with HIV, said Brophy, noting that in the 1990s, before the advent of antiretroviral drugs, 84 per cent of HIV-positive moms-to-be were diagnosed after they got pregnant.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhereas in the more-recent era, like 2008 to 2013, only 10 per cent were diagnosed during their pregnancy,\u201d he said, with 90 per cent knowing they had HIV before becoming pregnant and already on infection-dampening drug treatment.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd what that means is women are getting diagnosed and put on treatment… and then choosing to have babies.\u201d<\/p>\n

Antiretroviral drugs stop HIV from replicating in the cells and eventually destroying the immune system and progressing to AIDS.<\/p>\n

But even among women who learn they are HIV-positive during their pregnancy, babies are rarely at risk of getting the infection, as long as the mothers are able to get on antiretrovirals for at least a month before giving birth, Brophy said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI reassure moms that for women who\u2019ve been on medication and are well-suppressed and everything goes fine at delivery… I tell them: \u2018Don\u2019t worry about your baby, your baby will be fine.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019ve seen hundreds of babies at this point and none have been infected. It\u2019s only the babies where mom\u2019s virus isn\u2019t suppressed at delivery \u2013 because of not enough time on treatment or not knowing the diagnosis \u2013 where there\u2019s a real risk of transmission.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brophy also presented a study Wednesday that looked at the countries of origin of HIV-positive women who gave birth in Canada between 1990 and 2013. Of almost 3,900 women, 54 per cent were foreign-born, and of those, 71 per cent emigrated from Africa.<\/p>\n

In the first half of the 1990s \u2013 before the use of antiretroviral drugs \u2013 the largest group of HIV-positive mothers came from French-speaking Haiti, with many of them settling in Quebec.<\/p>\n

Since 2008, the largest group of HIV-infected mothers has come to Canada from Ethiopia, Congo, Zimbabwe and Nigeria.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe interesting pattern we see in this is the source countries over time really reflect what\u2019s going on in the world around us,\u201d said Brophy. \u201cThere are many countries of conflict and we get an uptick in the number of women from those countries as people flee.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cCanada\u2019s perinatal HIV population really reflects global trends.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet the Canadian Perinatal HIV Surveillance Program studies show that African moms-to-be have a lower risk of transmitting HIV to their infants at birth than their Canadian-born counterparts, perhaps because HIV testing is required for immigration, he said.<\/p>\n

Joel Singer, a professor at UBC\u2019s School of Population and Public Health, co-authored a study showing that in 2014, 97 per cent of all HIV-positive women in Canada had received antiretroviral drugs before giving birth.<\/p>\n

Also of note, he said, is that HIV-infected aboriginal women and IV drug abusers \u2013 who previously had higher rates of mother-to-infant transmission \u2013 now have treatment rates comparable to other pregnant women with the virus.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re finally reaching all of these groups who were, for one reason or another, more marginalized,\u201d Singer said from Vancouver.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think the overall message is that Canada has done quite well (but) we have to continue to be vigilant, particularly with groups that were previously not getting the proper antenatal care.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe can\u2019t rest on our laurels.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TORONTO \u2013 Canada has virtually eliminated the incidence of mothers passing HIV to their infants at birth, primarily because of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":51429,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[35],"class_list":["post-56706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","tag-original","mauthors-sheryl-ubelacker","mauthors-the-canadian-press1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56706"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56706\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}