{"id":53916,"date":"2015-06-30T18:39:23","date_gmt":"2015-06-30T10:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=53916"},"modified":"2015-07-01T02:35:08","modified_gmt":"2015-06-30T18:35:08","slug":"malacanang-still-awaiting-copy-of-ombudsmans-decision-on-gen-purisima-et-al","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/06\/30\/malacanang-still-awaiting-copy-of-ombudsmans-decision-on-gen-purisima-et-al\/","title":{"rendered":"Malacanang still awaiting copy of Ombudsman&#8217;s decision on Gen. Purisima, et al"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_42279\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-42279\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/alan-purisima-mamasapano-senate-hearing.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-42279\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/alan-purisima-mamasapano-senate-hearing.jpg\" alt=\"Resigned PNP Chief Gen. Alan Purisima at Thursday's (Feb 12, 2015) Senate hearing on the Mamasapano clash (Photo courtesy of Sen. Grace Poe's Facebook page)\" width=\"960\" height=\"763\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/alan-purisima-mamasapano-senate-hearing.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/alan-purisima-mamasapano-senate-hearing-300x238.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-42279\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Resigned PNP Chief Gen. Alan Purisima at Thursday&#8217;s (Feb 12, 2015) Senate hearing on the Mamasapano clash (Photo courtesy of Sen. Grace Poe&#8217;s Facebook page)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA &#8212; A Palace official declined to comment on the Office of the Ombudsman&#8217;s decision to dismiss from government service police officers, including resigned Philippine National Police (PNP) Chief Police Director General Alan Purisima, for a questionable gun license delivery deal.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We will await the official copy of the Resolution from the Office of the Ombudsman for us to be able to properly address this matter,&#8221; said Presidential Communications Operations Office (PCOO) Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. in a text message.<\/p>\n<p>The Ombudsman&#8217;s decision Tuesday was made based on the cases filed against Purisima and 10 others regarding the alleged anomalous deal entered into by the national police&#8217;s Civil Security Group (CSG) and the Firearms and Explosive Office (FEO) with courier company, Werfast.<\/p>\n<p>The cases were separately filed by one Glenn Gerard Ricafranca and the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for the Military and Other Law Enforcement Offices&#8217; Fact-finding Investigation Bureau in 2014.<\/p>\n<p>The other police officials who were dismissed from service were former Central Luzon police chief C\/Supt. Raul Petrasanta, C\/Supt. Napoleon Estilles, S\/Supt. Allan Parreno, S\/Supt. Eduardo Acierto, S\/Supt. Melchor Reyes, Supt. Lenbell Fabia, C\/Insp. Sonia Calixto, C\/Insp. Nelson Bautista, C\/Insp. Ricardo Zapata Jr., and S\/Insp. Ford Tuazon.<\/p>\n<p>Their retirement benefits were ordered forfeited and they were barred from taking civil service examinations. They were also disqualified from government service.<\/p>\n<p>The cases against these police officers were filed after Ricafranca, a resident of Barangay Capantawan, Legazpi City, discovered the questionable deal between PNP&#8217;s FEO and Werfast while checking the process for firearm registration in March 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Also, gun owners have complained of late delivery and even non-delivery of their gun licenses.<\/p>\n<p>It was later found out that among the officials of Werfast was Ireno Bacolod, a former chief of the PNP&#8217;s Civil Security Group (CSG), which has the responsibility over FEO.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA &#8212; A Palace official declined to comment on the Office of the Ombudsman&#8217;s decision to dismiss from government service &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":42279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ph","mauthors-joann-santiago","mauthors-philippines-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53916\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}