{"id":51201,"date":"2015-06-06T12:53:37","date_gmt":"2015-06-06T04:53:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=51201"},"modified":"2015-06-08T12:59:41","modified_gmt":"2015-06-08T04:59:41","slug":"supposedly-extinct-amphibians-rediscovered-in-palawan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/06\/06\/supposedly-extinct-amphibians-rediscovered-in-palawan\/","title":{"rendered":"Supposedly extinct amphibians rediscovered in Palawan"},"content":{"rendered":"
\""Lost<\/a>
“Lost to science for 40 years, the Palawan toadlet (pictured, a male calling) was found recently in the Philippines.” (Photograph by Centre for Sustainability \/ National Geographic)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

PUERTO PRINCESA CITY — The National Geographic\u2019s (NatGeo) \u201cWeird & Wild\u201d website segment featured Tuesday \u201ctwo species of amphibians thought lost to science\u201d but were rediscovered again in the mountain forests of the Philippines, particularly in Palawan.<\/p>\n

In a feature written by Jason Bittel for NatGeo<\/a>, he noted that it had been \u201c50 years since anyone laid eyes on the Malatgan River caecilian, a legless amphibian native to the island province of Palawan in the Philippines.\u201d<\/p>\n

Before the rediscovery, Bittel said \u201cscience dreaded that the species, whose last record was lost in a museum during World War II, was gone forever.\u201d<\/p>\n

That was the common belief until a group of scientists made a recent trip to the Philippines and found \u201csomething slithering through the dirt.\u201d<\/p>\n

One of the members of the group, evolutionary biologist Rafe Brown of the University of Kansas (UOK), said the seeing afresh was \u201cbasically a coincidence.\u201d<\/p>\n

This was because one of the students, who went with them, \u201cwalked by it and thought it was a worm. But lo and behold, it was a Malatgan River caecilian.”<\/p>\n

Bittel\u2019s NatGeo weird and wild article narrated that Brown and his team have been striding and sifting through muds in Palawan for \u201cover 15 years looking for signs of this and other species lost to science.\u201d<\/p>\n

The serpentine amphibian was found accidentally in Cleopatra\u2019s Needle, a mystical mountain surround by lush forests in Puerto Princesa that is home to the Batak, Tagbanua, and other indigenous communities.<\/p>\n

Described, Brown said the amphibian does not have any \u201cflashy colors or anything like that, but it’s one of those last, iconic species that we couldn’t find.\u201d<\/p>\n

Also rediscovered was the Palawan toadlet (Pelophryne albotaeniata<\/em>), which Bittel wrote, \u201chad been missing for the last 40 years.\u201d<\/p>\n

The rediscoveries were the result of a survey launched in December 2014 by the Palawan Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD), Global Wildlife Conservation (GWC), and the Amphibian Survival Alliance (ASA), and Rainforest Trust (RT).<\/p>\n

Bittel\u2019s article quoted Robin Moore, conservation officer of ASA, in saying when they started the project, they didn\u2019t know for sure if the animals were in Cleopatra\u2019s Needle.<\/p>\n

Moore said the rediscoveries were \u201cincredible\u201d that it found the two amphibians after not seeing them for decades.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PUERTO PRINCESA CITY — The National Geographic\u2019s (NatGeo) \u201cWeird & Wild\u201d website segment featured Tuesday \u201ctwo species of amphibians thought …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":51439,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,95,5742],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ph","category-science-2","mauthors-celeste-anna-r-formoso","mauthors-philippines-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51201\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}