{"id":49442,"date":"2015-05-14T18:07:14","date_gmt":"2015-05-14T10:07:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=49442"},"modified":"2015-05-14T18:07:14","modified_gmt":"2015-05-14T10:07:14","slug":"not-a-money-issue-b-c-first-nation-says-no-to-1-15-billion-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/05\/14\/not-a-money-issue-b-c-first-nation-says-no-to-1-15-billion-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Not a money issue: B.C. First Nation says No to $1.15 billion deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_28337\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-28337\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_180078383.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-28337\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_180078383.jpg\" alt=\"Shutterstock\" width=\"1000\" height=\"626\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_180078383.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_180078383-768x480.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-28337\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Shutterstock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>PORT SIMPSON, B.C. &#8212; Members of a First Nation in northwestern British Columbia have rejected a $1.15-billion deal that would have paved the way for a liquefied natural gas terminal to be built in their traditional territory.<\/p>\n<p>The Lax Kw&#8217;alaams say their stance is about more than just money.<\/p>\n<p>Members voted against the Pacific NorthWest LNG project during three separate community meetings, the last of which was held Tuesday evening in Vancouver.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hopefully the public will recognize that unanimous consensus &#8230; sends an unequivocal message,&#8221; said the band&#8217;s Mayor Garry Reece in a statement issued Wednesday. &#8220;This is not a money issue: this is environmental and cultural.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A Yes vote for Petronas-owned Pacific NorthWest LNG would have secured consent for the construction of a terminal facility on Lelu Island, south of Prince Rupert at the head of the Skeena River.<\/p>\n<p>The project is the proposed terminus of an LNG pipeline that would stretch from the northeastern corner of the province. The pipeline is being proposed by Prince Rupert Gas Transmission, a subsidiary of oil-and-gas giant TransCanada.<\/p>\n<p>Members of the Lax Kw&#8217;alaams have raised concerns over the project&#8217;s potential impact on neighbouring Flora Bank, a marine ecosystem immediately adjacent to Lelu Island and over which a pipeline-toting suspension bridge has been proposed.<\/p>\n<p>The First Nation says the area&#8217;s fertile eel grass beds are important habitat for maturing fish and other marine animals.<\/p>\n<p>Pacific NorthWest LNG submitted an initial environmental impact statement to the federal government in February 2014, but was asked a year later by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency for further information.<\/p>\n<p>An updated study commissioned by the company, and dated May 5, concluded the underwater infrastructure would have little long-term impact on the marine ecosystem. It used 3D modelling to simulate the impact of the bridge&#8217;s tower pilings on fish habitat.<\/p>\n<p>The Lax Kw&#8217;alaams band maintains it is open to business and development &#8212; including from Pacific NorthWest LNG _ just not near Flora Bank.<\/p>\n<p>The island is Crown land and the Prince Rupert Port Authority has jurisdiction over the proposed terminal site.<\/p>\n<p>In its statement, the Lax Kw&#8217;alaams said the suggestion that government and the project proponent may proceed with the project without aboriginal consent would be &#8220;unfortunate.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Only Lax Kw&#8217;alaams have a valid claim to aboriginal title in the relevant area,&#8221; Reece said. &#8220;Their consent is required for this project to proceed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But if the First Nation band proves it has aboriginal title, Supreme Court of Canada precedent still gives the province the right to override that claim.<\/p>\n<p>In response to the No vote, Pacific Northwest LNG president Michael Culbert said in a statement that his company remains committed to the project and to meaningful discussion with First Nations leaders and community members.<\/p>\n<p>B.C. Premier Christy Clark said Tuesday that she believes it is just a matter of time before a negotiated agreement is reached with the 3,700-member First Nation.<\/p>\n<p>The B.C. government said it has reached pipeline-benefits agreements with 28 First Nations across the province. Of the 59 First Nations along TransCanada&#8217;s proposed LNG pipeline, only five have publicly announced they&#8217;ve signed deals with the government.<\/p>\n<p>Surrey-based Lax Kw&#8217;alaams member Cheryl Rose Spence voted against the proposal at Tuesday&#8217;s meeting. She said that of the more than 100 members at the gathering, only two people stood up to support accepting the multibillion-dollar offer.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a fight coming,&#8221; Spence said Wednesday. &#8220;But we&#8217;re not going to stop. We&#8217;re going to keep on fighting this.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PORT SIMPSON, B.C. &#8212; Members of a First Nation in northwestern British Columbia have rejected a $1.15-billion deal that would &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":28337,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,18,483],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ca","category-politics","mauthors-geordon-omand","mauthors-the-canadian-press1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49442\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}