{"id":46807,"date":"2015-04-14T07:35:05","date_gmt":"2015-04-13T23:35:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=46807"},"modified":"2015-04-14T07:35:05","modified_gmt":"2015-04-13T23:35:05","slug":"binays-ratings-dips-4th-in-a-row","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/04\/14\/binays-ratings-dips-4th-in-a-row\/","title":{"rendered":"Binay&#8217;s ratings dips, 4th in a row"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_24487\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-24487\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Jejomar-Binay.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-24487\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Jejomar-Binay-300x266.jpg\" alt=\"Vice President Jejomar Binay (Facebook photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"266\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Jejomar-Binay-300x266.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Jejomar-Binay-600x533.jpg 600w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Jejomar-Binay.jpg 960w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-24487\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Vice President Jejomar Binay (Facebook photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA &#8212; Vice President Jejomar Binay&#8217;s ratings posted its lowest in the latest survey of pollster Social Weather Stations (SWS).<\/p>\n<p>His ratings dropped for the fourth consecutive time since he assumed office in 2010. The first drop was recorded March 2014 where he posted +73 net satisfaction rating.<\/p>\n<p>The recent survey for 2015 showed Binay&#8217;s net satisfaction rating dropping to\u00a0+31 points, a 13 point drop from last quarter\u2019s +44 rating.<\/p>\n<p>The rating is computed by subtracting the percentage of dissatisfied to the percentage of satisfied.<\/p>\n<p>Satisfied respondents of Binay dropped to 58 percent from\u00a0December 2014\u2019s 65 percent. while\u00a0unsatisfied respondents rose to 28 percent from last quarter\u2019s 20 percent.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, public satisfaction rating on leaders of Congress&#8217; chambers continued to rise.<\/p>\n<p>Senate President Franklin Drilon gained an increase\u00a0on his net satisfaction rating, from December 2014\u2019s +28 rating to March 2015\u2019s +35 rating while\u00a0House Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. also gained an\u00a0increase, from last quarter\u2019s +11 to +12 rating.<\/p>\n<p>For key government institutions, the Senate and the Supreme Court gained a net satisfaction rating of &#8220;good&#8221; at\u00a0+31 and +34 ratings, respectively while the House of Representatives remained at +20 in the latest survey.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA &#8212; Vice President Jejomar Binay&#8217;s ratings posted its lowest in the latest survey of pollster Social Weather Stations (SWS). &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":24487,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ph","mauthors-lei-fontamillas","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46807\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24487"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}