{"id":45476,"date":"2015-03-24T23:23:50","date_gmt":"2015-03-24T15:23:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=45476"},"modified":"2015-03-25T00:48:24","modified_gmt":"2015-03-24T16:48:24","slug":"woman-protesting-bill-c-51-expelled-from-the-commons-for-exposing-her-breasts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/03\/24\/woman-protesting-bill-c-51-expelled-from-the-commons-for-exposing-her-breasts\/","title":{"rendered":"Woman protesting Bill C 51 expelled from the Commons for exposing her breasts"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_44550\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-44550\" style=\"width: 675px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/house-of-commons.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-44550\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/house-of-commons.jpg\" alt=\"House of Commons (www.parl.gc.ca)\" width=\"675\" height=\"445\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/house-of-commons.jpg 675w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/house-of-commons-300x198.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 675px) 100vw, 675px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-44550\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">House of Commons (www.parl.gc.ca)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA &#8212; The words &#8220;C-51: State terrorism&#8221; were scrawled on a woman&#8217;s breasts after she whipped off her top in the Commons on Monday, resulting in her being ejected from the public gallery.<\/p>\n<p>The group FEMEN Quebec claimed responsibility a few minutes later on social media, saying the act was meant to highlight its opposition to the Conservatives&#8217; proposed anti-terror bill.<\/p>\n<p>FEMEN says the legislation criminalizes freedom of expression. One of its provisions makes it criminal to publicly applaud a terrorist act.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The state becomes terrorist by creating these repressive, totalitarian measures,&#8221; said Montreal&#8217;s Neda Topaloski, who was banned from returning to Parliament for one year.<\/p>\n<p>The wide-ranging bill would give police much broader powers and allow them to detain terror suspects and give new powers to Canada&#8217;s spy agency.<\/p>\n<p>The Conservatives introduced the legislation in January and have said it will make Canadians safer and give police and security forces the tools they need to meet terrorist threats.<\/p>\n<p>Those opposed to C-51 say it would infringe upon Canadians&#8217; civil liberties and right to privacy, especially online.<\/p>\n<p>Topaloski had time to yell her opposition to the proposed legislation before being ejected after a brief chase by security.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I tried to stay as long as possible, grabbing on to things, but they ended up throwing me out,&#8221; Topaloski told The Canadian Press not long after her expulsion.<\/p>\n<p>Another group also held a protest in Ottawa against C-51, albeit a far tamer one.<\/p>\n<p>Some protesters travelled from Toronto to offer hugs and flowers to MPs.<\/p>\n<p>An organizer said the gestures were intended to help elected officials get over the trauma they might have experienced during the terror attack in Ottawa last year.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They went through really terrible events on October 22 and we feel they are being guided by fear in legislating,&#8221; said organizer Veronica Campbell.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA &#8212; The words &#8220;C-51: State terrorism&#8221; were scrawled on a woman&#8217;s breasts after she whipped off her top in &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":44550,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,7265],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news-weird","mauthors-melanie-marquis","mauthors-the-canadian-press1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45476"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45476\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/44550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}