{"id":44223,"date":"2015-03-06T20:46:08","date_gmt":"2015-03-06T12:46:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=44223"},"modified":"2015-03-06T20:46:08","modified_gmt":"2015-03-06T12:46:08","slug":"miriam-opposes-house-arrest-for-enrile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/03\/06\/miriam-opposes-house-arrest-for-enrile\/","title":{"rendered":"Miriam opposes house arrest for Enrile"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_37694\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-37694\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Miriam-Defensor-Santiago.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-37694\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Miriam-Defensor-Santiago-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"Veteran Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago (Facebook photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Miriam-Defensor-Santiago-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Miriam-Defensor-Santiago.jpg 960w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-37694\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Veteran Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago (Facebook photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA &#8212; For Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, it will not be a good idea to grant house arrest for Senate Minority Leader Juan Ponce Enrile while former\u00a0President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo remains under hospital detention.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhy should President Gloria Arroyo, a former president of the Philippines, be granted hospital arrest only while Enrile, who is just a former Senate president, should be granted house arrest?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This, according to her, will violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s already a violation of the equal protection of the law,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>The senator also commented on Enrile&#8217;s health condition, adding that she sees no proof that Enrile is really suffering pneumonia.<\/p>\n<p>She also added that ordinary cold can easily be confused with pneumonia.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPneumonia mimics a cold,\u201d she said. \u201cSo if you are coughing then you could already be placed under house arrest? You might as well just keep on coughing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere will be an epidemic of pneumonia in the jails,\u201d she said. \u201cI am certain of that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She also added that granting house arrest because of age is not right from a legal standpoint.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow many people of his age have died in jail waiting for their appeals to be decided?\u201d she asked.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhy are we making an exception for him? If we want persons of that age to stay out of jail, let us have a law, that is the procedure. You don\u2019t ask for an exception for one person in a democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Santiago also said that granting the house arrest for the argument that Enrile&#8217;s right to life includes the right to be taken away from a correctional facility will trivialize the constitutional principle.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt does not meet the threshold of a possible threat to the life of a person because every person is entitled to life, but not in that sense,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA &#8212; For Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, it will not be a good idea to grant house arrest for Senate Minority &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":37694,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ph","mauthors-lei-fontamillas","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44223\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}