{"id":44041,"date":"2015-03-05T01:51:29","date_gmt":"2015-03-04T17:51:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=44041"},"modified":"2015-03-05T01:51:29","modified_gmt":"2015-03-04T17:51:29","slug":"b-c-man-convicted-of-human-trafficking-in-nanny-case-gets-new-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/03\/05\/b-c-man-convicted-of-human-trafficking-in-nanny-case-gets-new-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"B.C. man convicted of human trafficking in nanny case gets new trial"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_12633\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12633\" style=\"width: 485px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_95407390.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-12633\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_95407390.jpg\" alt=\"Shutterstock Photo\" width=\"485\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_95407390.jpg 485w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/shutterstock_95407390-291x300.jpg 291w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-12633\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Shutterstock Photo<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>VANCOUVER &#8212; An appeal court has ordered a new trial for a British Columbia man who is alleged to have lied to get his Filipino nanny into Canada and then treated her like a slave.<\/p>\n<p>Franco Orr was convicted in 2013 and sentenced to 18 months in jail for human trafficking, illegally employing a foreign national and lying to immigration officials.<\/p>\n<p>He was charged along with his wife, Oi Long Nicole Huen, who was acquitted after the couple&#8217;s jury trial.<\/p>\n<p>Orr appealed, and the province&#8217;s top court sided with him Tuesday on one of four grounds &#8212; that the trial judge was wrong to allow the testimony of an expert witness &#8212; and ordered a new trial.<\/p>\n<p>Yvon Dandurand was called by the Crown to testify about &#8220;victimology,&#8221; a discipline focusing on how victims react to situations they face, and was asked a series of hypothetical questions in front of the jury.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Peter Willcock, writing for the three-member B.C. Court of Appeal panel, said the jury should have never heard Dandurand&#8217;s testimony because his qualifications had not been tested.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There was insufficient evidence of the probative value of the expert&#8217;s opinion to justify its admission,&#8221; wrote Willcock. &#8220;There was a clear risk that its admission would be wrongly relied upon as oath-helping.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The judges dismissed Orr&#8217;s other arguments that it was unreasonable for the jury to convict him while acquitting his wife, and the judge erred in instructing the jury on one of the counts.<\/p>\n<p>They also dismissed Orr&#8217;s claim that he suffered a &#8220;miscarriage of justice&#8221; because the jury should have heard statements made by the complainant to an officer that were inconsistent with her testimony during the trial.<\/p>\n<p>Orr had been charged with bringing Leticia Sarmiento into Canada from Hong Kong on false pretences, paying her $500 a month to take care of his three children.<\/p>\n<p>Sarmiento worked for 22 months before calling 911 to file a complaint.<\/p>\n<p>When B.C. Supreme Court Judge Richard Goepel handed down his sentence in 2013, he said the Crown didn&#8217;t prove that Sarmiento was subjected to humiliating or degrading treatment, but did prove that the man profited by paying low wages.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>VANCOUVER &#8212; An appeal court has ordered a new trial for a British Columbia man who is alleged to have &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":12633,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-immigration","mauthors-the-canadian-press1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44041"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44041\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12633"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}