{"id":43168,"date":"2015-02-22T16:54:54","date_gmt":"2015-02-22T08:54:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=43168"},"modified":"2015-02-22T16:54:54","modified_gmt":"2015-02-22T08:54:54","slug":"ecowaste-coalition-cautions-consumers-on-hazards-of-using-unregistered-cosmetics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/02\/22\/ecowaste-coalition-cautions-consumers-on-hazards-of-using-unregistered-cosmetics\/","title":{"rendered":"EcoWaste Coalition cautions consumers on hazards of using unregistered cosmetics"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_29407\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-29407\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_140071117.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29407\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_140071117.jpg\" alt=\"shutterstock\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_140071117.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_140071117-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/shutterstock_140071117-900x600.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-29407\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">shutterstock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA\u00a0 &#8212; Consumers should exercise maximum precaution when buying unregistered cosmetics, particularly in budget shops and malls, which may contain dangerous contaminants or ingredients beyond allowable limits.<\/p>\n<p>The EcoWaste Coalition, a chemical safety and zero waste watchdog, sounded the alarm over the unrestricted sale of smuggled cosmetics in Divisoria and Quiapo following a recent market investigation in Manila\u2019s must-visit places for bargain hunters.<\/p>\n<p>Prompted by a fresh advisory issued by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) on three lipsticks and whitening spray with high lead content, the group\u2019s AlerToxic Patrol last week obtained 35 samples of lipsticks costing PhP12.50 to PhP50 each from one department store and seven cosmetics retailers in the area.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe verified through the FDA\u2019s website if the lipsticks had the required market authorization and found out that most are not notified with the agency and therefore not authorized to be in the market,\u201d said Aileen Lucero, Coordinator, EcoWaste Coalition.<\/p>\n<p>Notified cosmetics carry the following information in English on the product label, package or leaflet: name, ingredients, net content, instruction on usage, batch number, special precautions if any, and country of manufacture and\/or importer.<\/p>\n<p>Among these unnotified lipsticks are Aili Kiss, Baolishi, Chanleevi, Daiyasi, Ily, Lidanxiu, Meiya, Miss Beauty, Miss Merry, Monaliza, Pure, Yan Di and one that only says \u201cLipstick,\u201d the EcoWaste Coalition reported.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the group expressed concern over the sale of the more expensive \u201cClass A\u201d imitations of high-end lipstick brands, particularly in Divisoria.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe booming sale of illegal cosmetics is very alarming with the culprits enjoying virtual impunity. This is frightening as some of these products are laden with dangerous chemicals posing serious health and environmental hazards,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSome lipsticks are terribly toxic with astronomical amounts of lead, a potent brain and developmental toxin,\u201d she pointed out.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the group detected atrocious levels of lead, over and above the 20 parts per million (ppm) limit under the ASEAN Cosmetics Directive, in several Baolishi and Monaliza lipsticks in the range of 2,278 to 17,100 ppm as measured by a handheld X-Ray Fluorescence spectrometer.<\/p>\n<p>Baolishi and Monaliza are among the 36 lipsticks ordered seized by the FDA in three advisories issued in 2013, 2014 and 2015 for exceeding the lead limit or for being marketed without the required authorization from the agency.<\/p>\n<p>Thirty-three of these 36 lipsticks were brought to the attention of the FDA by the EcoWaste Coalition and subsequently banned.<\/p>\n<p>The FDA had earlier warned that lipsticks with no market authorization \u201cmay contain high levels of heavy metals, especially lead, a proven toxicant that accumulates in the body through constant exposure and absorption over a prolonged period.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHealth problems through chronic ingestion of high level of lead in lipsticks may manifest as neurologic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal problems,\u201d the FDA warned.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn adults, lead toxicant has been linked with high blood pressure, joint pain, poor memory, and concentration problems. Lead easily crosses the placenta, and pregnant women should pay particular attention to the different sources of lead exposure,\u201d the FDA said.<\/p>\n<p>The EcoWaste Coalition last Friday sent 10 lipstick samples to the FDA for confirmatory laboratory analysis for toxic lead and mercury.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0 &#8212; Consumers should exercise maximum precaution when buying unregistered cosmetics, particularly in budget shops and malls, which may contain &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":29407,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,36,37,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-fashion-and-beauty","category-health","category-news-ph","mauthors-philippines-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43168\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}