{"id":38113,"date":"2015-01-11T15:49:11","date_gmt":"2015-01-11T07:49:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=38113"},"modified":"2015-01-11T15:49:11","modified_gmt":"2015-01-11T07:49:11","slug":"republicans-court-ship-oil-pipeline-decision-back-to-obama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/01\/11\/republicans-court-ship-oil-pipeline-decision-back-to-obama\/","title":{"rendered":"Republicans, court ship oil pipeline decision back to Obama"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_38185\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-38185\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_218485882.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-38185\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_218485882.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. President Barack Obama (Mykhaylo Palinchak \/ Shutterstock)\" width=\"1000\" height=\"802\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_218485882.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_218485882-300x241.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-38185\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">U.S. President Barack Obama (Mykhaylo Palinchak \/ Shutterstock)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Congressional Republicans and Nebraska&#8217;s Supreme Court have shipped the Keystone XL oil pipeline project right back to a reluctant President Barack Obama.<\/p>\n<p>Obama is so loath to make the call that deliberations have entered their sixth year, nearly as long as he has held office.<\/p>\n<p>He has blamed the delays on bureaucratic formalities and parochial issues in Nebraska, even when skeptics claimed that the politics of Obama&#8217;s re-election race in 2012 were a more accurate explanation.<\/p>\n<p>That campaign is past, the Nebraska issue is settled and a bipartisan bill forcing the pipeline&#8217;s approval may soon reach Obama. Those on opposite sides of the debate just want the president to decide.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s time for the State Department and the president to make a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline &#8211; however they decide &#8211; because six years is beyond long enough,&#8221; said Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, among the Democrats supporting the pipeline.<\/p>\n<p>In April, just as the State Department&#8217;s review was nearing an end, Obama suspended it. The department has jurisdiction because the pipeline would start in Canada.<\/p>\n<p>The White House cited uncertainty about the pipeline&#8217;s route, spurred by a Nebraska court challenge.<\/p>\n<p>On Friday, the Nebraska Supreme Court threw out the case, clearing the way for the pipeline to snake through the state as envisioned.<\/p>\n<p>The State Department said it would pick up its review where it left off. It was unclear how long that review will last.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans and some Democrats don&#8217;t want to wait.<\/p>\n<p>Now in charge of both the House and Senate, Republicans are speeding a bill that would authorize construction of the 1,179-mile pipeline. It would carry more than 800,000 barrels of crude oil a day from Canada to refineries along the Texas Gulf Coast.<\/p>\n<p>The House approved the legislation Friday, ending the first week of the new Congress. The Senate planned a test vote on an identical bill Monday, hoping to get it to Obama quickly.<\/p>\n<p>Obama has repeatedly threatened a veto, saying Congress must not circumvent the executive branch&#8217;s authority.<\/p>\n<p>So far, Republicans haven&#8217;t shown they have the votes to override a veto.<\/p>\n<p>Obama believes the project has becoming a proxy battle for the broader debate over global warming.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A vote against Keystone sends the signal that our government is taking the science of climate change and risk analysis seriously,&#8221; said Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M.<\/p>\n<p>Outside the White House on Saturday, dozens of people rallied in support of Obama&#8217;s pledge to veto any legislation approving the pipeline.<\/p>\n<p>The energy industry and business groups say Obama is jeopardizing an $8 billion project that could create thousands of jobs.<\/p>\n<p>Obama has said he will only allow the pipeline if it won&#8217;t lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions. He also is skeptical of claims by supporters that the pipeline will create jobs or lessen U.S. dependence on foreign oil.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think that there&#8217;s been this tendency to really hype this thing as some magic formula to what ails the U.S. economy,&#8221; Obama said in a December news conference.<\/p>\n<p>For Obama, the GOP&#8217;s attempt to force action is a sign of his diminished leverage over Congress in his final two years.<\/p>\n<p>Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., who is sponsoring the Keystone bill in the Senate, said approving the pipeline would be a good-faith measure that would make it easier for Obama and Republicans to compromise on other fronts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That would show some willingness on his part to start working together,&#8221; Hoeven said. &#8220;He&#8217;s got to start working with Congress.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Congressional Republicans and Nebraska&#8217;s Supreme Court have shipped the Keystone XL oil pipeline project right back to a &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":38185,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,483,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-politics","category-news-w","mauthors-josh-lederman","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38113\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}