{"id":37889,"date":"2015-01-09T04:04:24","date_gmt":"2015-01-08T20:04:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=37889"},"modified":"2015-01-10T17:47:12","modified_gmt":"2015-01-10T09:47:12","slug":"selfie-sticks-tourist-convenience-or-purely-narcissi-stick-narcissi-stick","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/01\/09\/selfie-sticks-tourist-convenience-or-purely-narcissi-stick-narcissi-stick\/","title":{"rendered":"Selfie Sticks: Tourist convenience or purely narcissi-stick?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_236774377.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-38045\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_236774377.jpg\" alt=\"shutterstock_236774377\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_236774377.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/shutterstock_236774377-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>NEW YORK &#8212; Selfies at tourist attractions are nothing new. But until recently, if you wanted a perfectly composed picture of yourself with Times Square or the Colosseum in the background, you might have asked a passer-by to take the photo.<\/p>\n<p>Now, though, relatively new gadgets called selfie sticks make it easy to take your own wide-angled self-portraits or group shots. Fans say the expandable rods, which allow users to hold their cellphones a few feet away, are the ultimate convenience: no more bothering passers-by to take pictures, no more fretting about strangers taking lousy shots or running off with a pricey iPhone.<\/p>\n<p>But some travelers bemoan the loss of that small interaction that came with politely asking a local to help preserve a memory. And critics express outright hatred of selfie sticks as obnoxious symbols of self-absorption. They even have a derisive name for them, playing on the narcissistic behavior they think the sticks encourage: narcissi-stick.<\/p>\n<p>Sarah Kinling of Baltimore said she was approached &#8220;17 times&#8221; by vendors selling selfie sticks at the Colosseum in Rome. &#8220;They&#8217;re the new fanny pack &#8211; the quickest way to spot a tourist,&#8221; she said. &#8220;The more I saw them in use, the more I saw how much focus people were putting on selfies, and not turning around to see what they were there to see.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>When Kinling wanted a photo of herself with her sister and sister-in-law, she asked strangers to take the shot. &#8220;Even when the other person didn&#8217;t speak English, you hold your camera up and make the motion and they understand,&#8221; she said.<\/p>\n<p>But some travelers say it&#8217;s better to stage your own vacation photos. Andrea Garcia asked a passer-by to take her photo in Egypt and later realized he&#8217;d zoomed in on her face, cutting out the pyramids behind her. &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t really be mad at him &#8211; he wasn&#8217;t my photographer, I didn&#8217;t pay him,&#8221; she said. The experience made her appreciate the selfie sticks she sees tourists using at 1 World Trade near her office in Lower Manhattan. &#8220;Take control of your image!&#8221; she says.<\/p>\n<p>Selfie sticks are just starting to show up at attractions in the U.S., but they&#8217;re ubiquitous in many destinations overseas, from Dubai&#8217;s skyscraper, the Burj Khalifa, to the Eiffel Tower in Paris. A soccer stadium in London, White Hart Lane, has even banned them because they obstruct other fans&#8217; views.<\/p>\n<p>The Four Seasons Hotel in Houston started making them available to guests last week, &#8220;similar to the way many hotels provide umbrellas,&#8221; said hotel spokeswoman Laura Pettitt.<\/p>\n<p>The sticks range in price from $5 to $50. Simpler models merely grip the phone, so users must trigger the shot with a self-timer on the camera. More sophisticated versions either use Bluetooth technology or connect the phone to the stick with a cord, with a button on the grip triggering the shot.<\/p>\n<p>Jasmine Brett Stringer of Minneapolis writes a lifestyles blog called &#8220;Carpe Diem with Jasmine&#8221; and uses selfie sticks to record her videos. &#8220;A friend brought one back from Dubai and I said, `I&#8217;ve got to get one,'&#8221; she said. Now she doesn&#8217;t have to rely on others to help shoot her work. The sticks are also an improvement over hand-held selfies because they let you shoot &#8220;at better angles, avoid the awkward arm reach and the dreadful half-face shot.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Megan Marrs of Boston, who writes a travel blog called Vanishing Balloons, thought the sticks were ridiculous when she saw them on a trip to South Korea last fall. &#8220;It seemed so vain and silly,&#8221; said Marrs. But she bought one to bring home as a gift, ended up trying it herself and became a fan.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t love intruding on other people&#8217;s experience, asking them to take my picture &#8211; they&#8217;re there to enjoy their time, too,&#8221; she said. &#8220;Sometimes I feel silly &#8211; one more tourist taking a selfie in front of the Colosseum &#8211; but I&#8217;m more comfortable doing it myself than asking someone else.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK &#8212; Selfies at tourist attractions are nothing new. But until recently, if you wanted a perfectly composed picture &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":38045,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-lifestyle","mauthors-beth-j-harpaz","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37889\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38045"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}